Title : Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions in Indonesia Using the Extension C-TAM-TPB Model

Vol 6 No 12 (2023): Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2023

Article Date Published : 24 December 2023 | Page No.: 8065-8078 | Google Scholar | Crossref doi for this article

Abstract :

The success of electric vehicles is influenced by how they are accepted and adopted by society. Identifying driving factors can help stakeholders take appropriate steps to drive Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions. This study examined the driving variables of EV Purchase Intention using the C-TAM-TPB model approach and six extension variables in an emerging market context. This research is quantitative research. Data were collected from a questionnaire distributed to 385 people using a purposive sampling technique. PLS is used in the data analysis technique. Based on the research results, Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use significantly and positively affects Attitudes Toward EV. Furthermore, Attitude Toward EVs, Price Value, and Cognitive Status significantly and positively affect EV Purchase Intention. Meanwhile, the Infrastructure Barrier significantly and negatively affect EV Purchase Intention. Meanwhile, Incentive Policy Perception, Functional Value, and Perceived Risk have no significant effect on EV Purchase Intention.

Keywords :

C-TAM-TPB, Electric Vehicle, Indonesia, Infrastructure Barrier, Purchase Intention., Transportation.

References :

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Biresselioglu, M. E., Demirbag Kaplan, M., & Yilmaz, B. K. (2018). Electric mobility in Europe: A comprehensive review of motivators and barriers in decision making processes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 109(January), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.017
  3. Butt, M. M. H., & Singh, J. G. (2022). Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Acceptance, Energy Demand and Co2 Emissions in Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2(3), 100081. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4153365
  4. Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Guerzoni, M. (2018). Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries. Energy Policy, 118(March), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.034
  5. Chen, S., & Lu, C. (2016). A Model of Green Acceptance and Intentions to Use Bike-Sharing : YouBike Users in Taiwan. Networks and Spatial Economics, 1103–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-015-9312-8
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. JSTOR, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.33621
  7. Dwipayana, A. D., Pradana, A., & Sulistyo, A. B. (2023). Barriers to Electric Car Acceptance : Analysis of Consumer Perceptions Regarding Safety and Security. ASTONJADRO, 12(2), 469–479.
  8. Featherman, M., Jia, S. (Jasper), Califf, C. B., & Hajli, N. (2021). The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169(December 2020), 120847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120847
  9. Febransyah, A. (2021). Predicting purchase intention towards battery electric vehicles: A case of indonesian market. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj12040240
  10. (2023). Gaikindo Data Wholesales January – December 2022.
  11. Gandajati, A. F., & Mahyuni, L. P. (2022). Kendaraan Listrik di Mata Gen Y: Faktor Apa yang Menjelaskan Minat Belinya? Forum Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 24(4), 717–723. https://doi.org/10.30872/jfor.v24i4.10436
  12. Giansoldati, M., Monte, A., & Scorrano, M. (2020). Barriers to the adoption of electric cars: Evidence from an Italian survey. Energy Policy, 146(June), 111812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111812
  13. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. In Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal (Vol. 30, Issue 1). Springer Nature Switzerland.
  14. Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.033
  15. Hu, X., Zhou, R., Wang, S., Gao, L., & Zhu, Z. (2023). Consumers’ value perception and intention to purchase electric vehicles: A benefit-risk analysis. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 49(July 2022), 101004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.101004
  16. Huang, X., & Ge, J. (2019). Electric vehicle development in Beijing : An analysis of consumer purchase intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 216, 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231
  17. Indrawati, & Haryoto, K. S. (2015). The Use of Modified Theory of Acceptance and Use Of Technology 2 to Predict Prospective Users’ Intention in Adopting TV Streaming. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computing and Informatics, ICOCI 2015, 125, 206–215.
  18. Junquera, B., Moreno, B., & Álvarez, R. (2016). Analyzing consumer attitudes towards electric vehicle purchasing intentions in Spain: Technological limitations and vehicle confidence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 109, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.006
  19. Kato, T. (2021). Functional value vs emotional value: A comparative study of the values that contribute to a preference for a corporate brand. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100024
  20. Kato, T., & Tsuda, K. (2019). Impact of the Variety of Functional Options on Willingness to Pay. Proceedings of the 20th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, July, 85–90.
  21. Krishnan, V. V., & Koshy, B. I. (2021). Evaluating the factors influencing purchase intention of electric vehicles in households owning conventional vehicles. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.05.013
  22. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78(December 2016), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
  23. Loengbudnark, W., Khalilpour, K., Bharathy, G., Taghikhah, F., & Voinov, A. (2022). Battery and hydrogen-based electric vehicle adoption: A survey of Australian consumers perspective. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2451–2463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.11.007
  24. Matthews, L., Hair, J., & Matthews, R. (2018). PLS-SEM: The Holy Grail for Advanced Analysis. Marketing Management Journal, 28(1), 14–15.
  25. Miranda, J. L., & Delgado, C. J. M. (2020). Determinants of electric car purchase intention in Portugal. Developments in Corporate Governance and Responsibility, 15, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2043-052320200000015009
  26. Mpoi, G., Milioti, C., & Mitropoulos, L. (2023). Factors and incentives that affect electric vehicle adoption in Greece. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, xxxx, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.01.002
  27. Noppers, E., Keizer, K., Milovanovic, M., & Steg, L. (2019). The role of adoption norms and perceived product attributes in the adoption of Dutch electric vehicles and smart energy systems. Energy Research and Social Science, 57(October 2018), 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101237
  28. Ozaki, R., & Sevastyanova, K. (2011). Going hybrid : An analysis of consumer purchase motivations. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2217–2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.024
  29. Rahardi, R. A. M., & Rachmawati, I. (2023). Pendekatan Hierarki Kebutuhan Maslow pada Motivasi Pembelian Electric Vehicle di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Manajemen (IMAGE), 12(1), 13–26.
  30. Safarian, S. (2023). Environmental and energy impacts of battery electric and conventional vehicles: A study in Sweden under recycling scenarios. Fuel Communications, 14(December 2022), 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfueco.2022.100083
  31. Shakeel, U. (2022). Electric vehicle development in Pakistan: Predicting consumer purchase intention. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 5(November 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100065
  32. She, Z. Y., Qing Sun, Ma, J. J., & Xie, B. C. (2017). What are the barriers to widespread adoption of battery electric vehicles? A survey of public perception in Tianjin, China. Transport Policy, 56(July 2016), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.001
  33. Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & Wee, B. Van. (2014). The in fluence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043
  34. Singh, H., Singh, V., Singh, T., & Higueras-Castillo, E. (2023). Electric vehicle adoption intention in the Himalayan region using UTAUT2 – NAM model. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 11(August 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.100946
  35. Skippon, S., & Garwood, M. (2011). Responses to battery electric vehicles : UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance. Transportation Research Part D, 16(7), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.005
  36. Tarei, P. K., Chand, P., & Gupta, H. (2021). Barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125847
  37. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A Test of Competing Model. In Information Systems Research (Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 144–176). https://www.jstor.org/stable/23011007
  38. Tu, J. C., & Yang, C. (2019). Key factors influencing consumers’ purchase of electric vehicles. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143863
  39. Utami, M. W. Dela, Yuniaristanto, Y., & Sutopo, W. (2020). Adoption Intention Model of Electric Vehicle in Indonesia. Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri, 19(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.25077/josi.v19.n1.p70-81.2020
  40. Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Wong, T. K., Hanifah, H., Teoh, A. P., & Nawaser, K. (2022). Modelling electric vehicle purchase intention among generation Y consumers in Malaysia. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 43(February 2021), 100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100784
  41. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2015.7167037
  42. Wang, N., Tang, L., & Pan, H. (2018). Analysis of public acceptance of electric vehicles: An empirical study in Shanghai. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(June 2017), 284–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.011
  43. Wang, R., Zhao, X., Wang, W., & Jiang, L. (2021). What factors affect the public acceptance of new energy vehicles in underdeveloped regions? A case study of Gansu Province, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318(967). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128432
  44. Wang, X. W., Cao, Y. M., & Zhang, N. (2021). The influences of incentive policy perceptions and consumer social attributes on battery electric vehicle purchase intentions. Energy Policy, 151(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112163
  45. Weiss, M., Zerfass, A., & Helmers, E. (2019). Fully electric and plug-in hybrid cars – An analysis of learning rates, user costs, and costs for mitigating CO 2 and air pollutant emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 1478–1489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.019
  46. Weldon, P., Morrissey, P., & O’Mahony, M. (2018). Long-term cost of ownership comparative analysis between electric vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 578–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.024
  47. Widodo, A., & Wahid, N. A. (2023). Mediating Role of Environmental Attitude Between Consumers’ Satisfaction and Repeat Purchase of Eco-friendly Petrol in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 23(2), 168. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v23i2.5461
  48. Yasyi, D. (2022). Electric Vehicles Sales Southeast Asia Countries 2022 | Seasia.co. https://seasia.co/2022/12/02/electric-vehicles-sales-southeast-asia-countries-2022
  49. Yuliani, P. A. (2021). Kendaraan Bermotor Penyumbang Utama Polusi Udara. https://m.mediaindonesia.com/infografis/detail_infografis/442518-kendaraan-bermotorpenyumbang-utama-polusi-udara
  50. Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ismail, N., Ahrari, S., & Abu Samah, A. (2021). The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Business Research, 132(May 2019), 732–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.053
  51. Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., & Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112(January), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027

Author's Affiliation

   Indira Rachmawati
School of Economics and Business, Telkom University, Indonesia

   Rafi Amani Muflih Rahardi
School of Economics and Business, Telkom University, Indonesia

Copyrights & License

Indira Rachmawati, Rafi Amani Muflih Rahardi, 2023

This work is licenced under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Details

How to Cite :

Analysis of Electric Vehicle Purchase Intentions in Indonesia Using the Extension C-TAM-TPB Model. Indira Rachmawati, Rafi Amani Muflih Rahardi , 6(12), 8065-8078. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=14035&pid=13554

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Indira Rachmawati, Rafi Amani Muflih Rahardi,

View

160

Citation

Downloads

Article Details