Abstract :

The aim of this research is to analyze the student’s creative thinking skills under the implementation of the Problem-Based Learning Model equipped with JBatik software. This study used a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design: pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. The research respondents consisted of two classes: the control class with 31 students and the experimental class with 29 students. The research instruments used were interviews, questionnaires, observations, and creative thinking tests. Data analysis techniques used a one-way ANOVA test, LSD post hoc test, and independent sample t-test. The one-way ANOVA test results showed a sig value of 0.000 < 0.05, indicating a significant influence of applying the Problem-Based Learning Model Integrated with Information Technology on independence. The LSD post hoc test showed a mean difference between the experimental group of 9.600 and the control group of 5.067. The results showed that based on the independent sample t-test analysis on the post-test, there was a significant difference between the control class and the experimental class. It is due to the sig (2-tailed) score is 0.002 (p = <0.05). The qualitative analysis shows all the Pearson Correlation Coefficient values are less than 0.7. Based on this, there is no significant similarity between the interviews Thus, it can be concluded that the experimental group taught using the Problem-Based Learning Model Integrated with Information Technology has a better effect on independence compared to the control group taught using the Problem-Based Learning Model-STEM.

---

Keywords :

Creative Thinking Skills, JBatik, Learning Media., Problem based learning., STEAM.

---

References :

1. Armatas, C., Holt, D., & Rice, M. (2003). Impacts of an online-supported, resource-based learning environment: Does one size fit all? Distance Education, 24(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791032000127446
2. Ball, A., Joyce, H. D., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2016). Exploring 21st Century Skills and Learning Environments for Middle School Youth. International Journal of School Social Work, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012
3. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research (Vol. 4).
4. Daga, A. T. (2021). Makna Merdeka Belajar dan Penguatan Peran Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Educatio, 7(3), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i3.1279
5. Dominggus, R., Kristin, S., Martha M, B., Since Y, K., Vera V, K., & CorneliLatu, P. (2021). Resource based learning design thinking (RBLDT): A model to improve students’ creative thinking skills, concept gaining, and digital literacy. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 288–302.
6. Erdem, C. (2019). Itroduction to 21st Century Skills and Education. In Cambridge Scholars Publishing (p. 17). Cambridge Scholars
7. Gay, Geoffrey E. MIlls, A. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (Tenth Edit). Pearson Education
8. Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.2359
9. Hamiti, M., & Reka, B. (2012). Teaching with Technology. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.26
10. Hasan, S. H. (2012). PENDIDIKAN SEJARAH UNTUK MEMPERKUAT PENDIDIKAN KARAKTER. Paramita, 22(1), 81–95
11. Hero, J. (2019). International Journal of Sciences : The Impact of Technology Integration in Teaching Performance. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 48(1), 101–114.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342586669_The_Impact_of_Technology_Integration_in_Teaching_Performance/link/5efbea9f299bf18816f5f709/downloa

12. Hursen, C. (2019). The effect of technology supported problem-based learning approach on adults’ self-efficacy perception for research-inquiry. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1131–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9822-
13. Indarta, Y., Jalinus, N., Waskito, W., Samala, A. D., Riyanda, A. R., & Adi, N. H. (2022). Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dengan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam Perkembangan Era Society 5.0. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3011–3024. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.258
14. Jan, H. (2017). Teacher of 21 st Century: Characteristics and Development. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(9), 50–54. www.iiste.or
15. Jayanti, D. G., Maskun, & Imanita, M. (2019). Hubungan Kemandirian Belajar Dengan Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA Muhammadiyah Pringsewu. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Penelitian Sejarah UNILA, 7(03), 12
16. (2017). Konsep dan Pedoman Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter (Cetakan Kedua). Kemendikbud. http://cerdasberkarakter.kemdikbud.go.i
17. (2019). Pengaruh metode belajar resource based learning terhadap kemandirian belajar siswa pada Mata Pelajaran fiqih (Penelitian di MTs Al-Khairiyah Kresek Kab. Tangerang)
18. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self Directed Learning: A Guide For Learners and Teachers. Cambridge Adult Education
19. Kochhar, S.K. (2008). Pembelajaran Sejarah. Jakarta : Grasindo
20. Kopzhassarova, U., Akbayeva, G., Eskazinova, Z., Belgibayeva, G., & Tazhikeyeva, A. (2016). Enhancement of students’ independent learning through their critical thinking skills development. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 11585–11592
21. Kurniyawati, F. E. (2019). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Dengan Menggunakan Mind Mapping Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Pengetahuan Awal Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ips Di Mtsn Sukowono Kelas VIII Semester 1 Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017. Universitas Jember
22. Laar, E. Van, Deursen, A. J. A. . van, Dijk, J. A. G. M. Van, & Haan, J. de. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A sySTEAMatic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.01
23. Meindrawati, A. (2017). Penerapan Metode Discovery Learning untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XII 1 MAN 1 Jember Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Universitas Jember
24. Mentz, E., Beer, J. De, & Bailey, R. (2019). Self Directed learning for the 21st Century: Implications for Higher Education (Vol. 1). AOSIS
25. Mosca, J. B., Curtis, K. P., & Savoth, P. G. (2019). New Approaches to Learning for Generation Z. Journal of Business Diversity, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v19i3.221\
26. (2020). The influence of problem-based learning model as learning method, and learning motivation on entrepreneurial attitude. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13230
27. Orak, S. D., & Inözü, J. (2021). Teachers’ Awareness and Actual Practices of 21st Century Learning and Innovation Skills. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 975–997
28. Pradita, S. M., & Sidik, H. (2020). Utilization of Internet-Based History Learning Media in 21st Century Universities. Literatus, 2(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.37010/lit.v2i2.8
29. Priyanti, P. U. (2019). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Self Directed Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kelas XI IPS 2 MAN 1 JEMBER Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. In Digital Repository Universitas Jember (Issue September 2019). Universitas Jember
30. Rahayu, W. (2019). Pembelajaran Sejarah untuk Generasi Z. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Indonesia, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17977/um033v2i12019p00
31. Roy, A. (2019). Technology in Teaching and Learning. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 7(4), 414–422. https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol7.iss4.143
32. Rufaidah, L. N. (2020). PERBEDAAN MODEL PBL ( PROBLEM BASED LEARNING ) & SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING BERBASIS TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI TERHADAP KEMANDIRIAN DAN HASIL BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI IPS PADA MATA PELAJARAN SEJARAH. Universitas Jember
33. Safitri, I. (2019). PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL RESOURCE BASED LEARNING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR DAN HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF PESERTA DIDIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI PADA KELAS X SMAN 15 BANDAR LAMPUNG
34. Sari, R. M. (2019). Analisis Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar Sebagai Strategi Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan. PRODU: Prokurasi Edukasi Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.15548/p-prokurasi.v1i1.332
35. Sherpa, K., & Bachar, A. (2018). Changing Roles And Responsibility Of Teachers In 21st Century. Interational Education & Research Journal, 4(2), 14–15. http://supannapetraksa.blogspot.com/2015/09/21st-century_1.htm
36. Steinberg, L. (2017). Adolescene. In McGraw-Hill (Eleventh E). McGraw-Hill
37. Sugeng, B., & Suryani, A. W. (2019). Enhancing the learning performance of passive learners in a financial management class using problem-based learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.1.
38. Triastuti, N. J. (2016). The Relationship of Self-Directed Learning Readiness and Learning Motivation Towards Learning Achievement of First Year Medical Students. The 2nd International Conference on Science, Technology, and Humanity, 1–16
39. Umamah, N. (2015). TEACHERS, INNOVATIVE INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN AND A GO0D CHARACTER IN INFORMATION ERA. Proceeding of International Seminar
40. Umamah, N. (2017). Pembelajaran Sejarah Kesiapannya Menghadapi Tantangan Zaman. Ombak Anggota IKAPI
41. (2019). Pengembangan E-Book Sejarah Indonesia Berbasis Discovery Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemandirian Peserta Didik Menggunakan Model ASSURE. In Digital Repository Universitas Jember. Universitas Jember
42. Yılmaz, A. (2021). The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers’ critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 163–199. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.35.8.
43. Yu, E., & Suny, C. (2020). Student-inspired optimal design of online learning for generation Z. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1)
44. Z C Cotrunnada et al. (2019). Comparison of creative and creative capabilities history learning results using the method problem solving and problem based learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012154
45. Zahro, M., Sumardi, & Marjono. (2017). The Implementation Of The Character Education In History Teaching. Jurnal Historica, 1(2252), 1–11.
46. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
47. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York:
48. Larasati, F. U., Aini, N., & Irianti, A. H. S. (2021). Proses Pembuatan Batik Tulis Remekan Di Kecamatan Ngantang. Prosiding Pendidikan Teknik Boga Busana, 16(1).
49. Dhaneswara, W. (2011). Optimasi Sistem Pencelup Kain Batik Pada Proses Pembuatan Batik (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada).
50. Steelyana, W. (2012). Batik, a beautiful cultural heritage that preserve culture and support economic development in Indonesia. Binus Business Review, 3(1), 116.
51. Nurjanah, I., Abdullah, A. G., & Widiaty, I. (2020). The application of jBatik software for batik products. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 830, No. 4, p. 042095). IOP Publishing.
52. Sumardi, Ridlo, Z. R., Puji R. P. N, Dafik. (2022). The Research-based Learning-STEM Learning Activity Framework: The use of Software J-Batik in Designing the Indonesian Batik Motifs as Traditional Cultural Heritage to Improve Students Historical Literacy. International Academic Journal of Education & Literature, 3(4), 24-34.
53. Sugiono, (2017). The mixed method of research. Bandung, Indonesia: AlfaBeta
54. Yuliani, Anisa; Dharmono; Naparin, Akhmad; & Zaini, Muhammad. (2018). Creative Thinking Ability of Biology Education Students in Solving Plant Ecological Problems. Journal of Bioeducation: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1). https://dx.doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v11i1.19736
55. Sudarsono, S., Kartono, K., Mulyono, M., Mariani, S. (2022). The Effect of STEM Model Based on Bima’s Local Cultural on Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1525a
56. Cheng, Y.C. & So, W.W.M. (2020), Managing STEM learning: a typology and four models of integration, International Journal of Educational Management, 34(6), 1063-1078. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2020-0035
57. Rohim, M. A., Dafik, Slamin, & Sucianto, B. (2019). The analysis of implementation of research based learning implementation in developing the studens’ creative thinking skill in solving dominating set problem. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243, 012143. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012143
58. Haydn, T, Arthur, J & Hunt, M (2003). Learning to teach history in the secondary school (2nd Ed) London: Routledge Falmer
59. Sumardi, S., Puji, R. P. N., Dafik, D., & Ridlo, Z. R. (2023). The Implementation of RBL-STEM Learning Materials to Improve Students Historical Literacy in Designing the Indonesian Batik Motifs. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2), 581–602.