Abstract :

The thermal comfort of outdoor open spaces in hot and dry regions is an important aspect that needs to be considered when designing neighborhoods. Jaisalmer town which experiences harsh conditions during long summers is selected as a study area. This study analyses the material performance of vertical surfaces and their effects on outdoor thermal comfort. The existing site and its surface materials were studied, and on-site measurements were taken in June 2022. The was then compared with other scenarios which were simulated using Envi-MET 5.0.1. The scenarios were developed with the morphology exactly the same as the base case and variation in terms of surface materials. Four different configurations were developed including the base case. The results showed that the Case 1 scenario performed poorly, whereas case 4 showed the lowest temperatures. A strong correlation is observed between surface temperature and thermal parameters as well as albedo and thermal parameters. Making efforts in reducing the surface temperature and albedo can reduce the PET and Tmrt significantly. East-west oriented scenario showed the highest values for all the thermal parameters due to the longer exposure direct solar radiation. This study is an effort to emphasize the attention towards the efficient and appropriate material use which is also in harmony with the climate of the town. The traditional Jaisalmer limestone showed good positive results for all the analyses performed in this paper.

---

Keywords :

Albedo, mean radiant temperature, physiological equivalent temperature, surface temperature, Thermal Comfort

---

References :

1. D. Khaire, L. O. Madrigal, and B. S. Lanzarote, “Role of Built Geometry in the Micro-climatic Modifications : Case of Addis Ababa , Ethiopia,” Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 12, no. 3, 2023,

doi: 10.15680/IJIRSET.2023.1203001.

2. R. Amirtham, E. Horrison, S. Rajkumar, and L. Rose, “Impact of urban morphology on Microclimatic conditions and outdoor thermal comfort – A study in mixed residential neighbourhood of Chennai, India,” ICUC9 – 9th Int. Conf. Urban Clim. jointly with 12th Symp. Urban Environ., no. Oke 1976, 2015.
3. Ali-Toudert and H. Mayer, “Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate,” Build. Environ., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 94–108, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.013.
4. B. Ali and S. Patnaik, “Thermal comfort in urban open spaces: Objective assessment and subjective perception study in tropical city of Bhopal, India,” Urban Clim., vol. 24, no. October, pp. 954–967, 2018,

doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2017.11.006.

5. Chatzidimitriou and S. Yannas, “Microclimate development in open urban spaces: The influence of form and materials,” Energy Build., vol. 108, pp. 156–174, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.048.
6. Dessi, “Urban Materials for Comfortable Open Spaces,” Proc. World Renew. Energy Congr. – Sweden, 8–13 May, 2011, Linköping, Sweden, vol. 57, pp. 3300–3307, 2011, doi: 10.3384/ecp110573300.
7. D. Khaire, L. O. Madrigal, and B. S. Lanzarote, “Effect of Surface Temperature on Outdoor Thermal Comfort : A Case of Varying Morphologies at Composite Climates,” vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 834–838, 2023.
8. Nottingham and N. E. User, “Sufeljen , Abdusalam ( 2014 ) Microclimate and thermal comfort of public enclosed courtyards in hot dry regions , with special reference to Tripoli , Libya . PhD thesis , University of Nottingham . OF PUBLIC ENCLOSED COURTYARDS IN HOT DRY REGIONS , WITH S,” 2014.
9. Bureau of Indian Standards, “National Building Code of India 2005,” 2005.
10. GOI, “Annual Climate Summary-2019. Ministry of Earth Sciences, India Meteorological Department,” 2019.
11. Mazdiyasni et al., “Increasing probability of mortality during Indian heat waves,” Sci. Adv., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700066.
12. Krishan, “Habitat of two deserts in India: hot-dry desert of Jaisalmer (Rajasthan) and the cold-dry high altitude mountainous desert of Leh (Ladakh),” Energy Build., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 217–229, 1996,

doi: 10.1016/0378-7788(95)00947-7.

13. T. Sataloff, M. M. Johns, and K. M. Kost, “ECBC 2017.”
14. Ali-Toudert and H. Mayer, “Erratum to ‘Numerical study on the effects of aspect ratio and orientation of an urban street canyon on outdoor thermal comfort in hot and dry climate’ [Building and Environment 41 (2006) 94-108] (DOI:10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.01.013),” Build. Environ., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1553–1554, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.12.013.

15. Ali-Toudert and H. Mayer, “Effects of asymmetry, galleries, overhanging façades and vegetation on thermal comfort in urban street canyons,” Sol. Energy, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 742–754, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2006.10.007.
16. Shishegar, “Street Design and Urban Microclimate: Analyzing the Effects of Street Geometry and Orientation on Airflowand Solar Access in Urban Canyons,” J. Clean Energy Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 52–56, 2013, doi: 10.7763/jocet.2013.v1.13.
17. E. Bhaskar and M. Mukherjee, “Optimizing street canyon orientation for Rajarhat Newtown, Kolkata, India,” Environ. Clim. Technol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2017, doi: 10.1515/rtuect-2017-0012.
18. H. Haseh, M. Khakzand, and M. Ojaghlou, “Optimal thermal characteristics of the courtyard in the hot and arid climate of Isfahan,” Buildings, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1–28, 2018, doi: 10.3390/buildings8120166.