Abstract :

Introduction: Childbearing in latter part of reproductive age is challenging. Adverse pregnancy outcomes increase with advanced (>35 years) maternal age (AMA) and comprehensive antenatal care (ANC) usage by AMA women improves their pregnancy outcomes. However, no recent local data are available on the AMA and pregnancy outcomes.

Objectives: To describe utilization of ANC and pregnancy outcomes of AMA women delivering at North Colombo Teaching Hospital and assessed the association between utilization of ANC services and selected pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 216 women aged >35 years delivered at Colombo North Teaching Hospital selected using a non-probability consecutive sampling method. Women were interviewed within 7 days postpartum inward using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Selected data were extracted from clinical records. Key elements of ANC (booking visit, type, frequency, services etc.) were scored and their association with pregnancy outcomes were assessed.

Results: A total of 216 AMA postpartum women (age range 35–45 years, mean 37.8 (SD=2.4)) were recruited (response rate 100%). Majority (91.7%, n=198) were multiparous. The current pregnancy was planned in 77.8% (n=168) and 52.7% (n=114) experienced antenatal morbidities. Adverse maternal (8.3%, n=18) and newborn (37%, n=80) outcomes were noted. Majority (75.9%, n=164) optimally utilized ANC. Sinhalese (OR=2.98, 95%CI 1.29–6.87, p=0.008), Buddhist (OR=2.53, 95%CI 1.33–4.80, p=0.004) women with intended pregnancies (OR=5.67, 95%CI 2.81–11.43, p<0.001) well utilized ANC. Women educated <10 years of formal education (OR=0.4, 95%CI 1.33–4.80, p=0.027), had contraceptive issues (OR=0.27, 95%CI 0.10–0.74, p=0.007) and had adverse newborn outcomes (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.16–0.61, p=0.001) reported low tendency to utilize ANC.

Conclusions: Many AMA women are multiparous and with planned pregnancies. Presence of adverse maternal & newborn outcomes is substantial. Majority well utilized ANC and it reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes. Effective strategies should be formulated to promote well-planned pregnancies in early reproductive ages of women.

---

Keywords :

Advanced maternal age pregnancy, Adverse pregnancy outcomes of AMA, Contributory factors of AMA, Utilization of antenatal care services.

---

References :

1. Annual Report 2020 | Central Bank of Sri Lanka (2020). Available at: https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/en/publications/economic-and-financial-reports/annual-reports/annual-report-2020 (Accessed: 11 February 2023).
2. Aoyama, K. et al. (2019) ‘Associatsion of Maternal Age With Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Canada’, JAMA network open. NLM (Medline), 2(8), p. e199875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9875.
3. Cleary-Goldman, J. et al. (2005a) ‘Impact of Maternal Age on Obstetric Outcome’, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 105(5, Part 1), pp. 983–990. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158118.75532.51.
4. Department of Census and Statistics (2022). Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.lk/ (Accessed: 11 February 2023).
5. FHB (2019) Annual Report, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00711-7.
6. Grotegut CA, Chisholm CA, Johnson LN, Brown HL, Heine RP, James AH. Medical and obstetric complications among pregnant women aged 45 and older. PLoS One. 2014;9:e96237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096237. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref] [Google Scholar].
7. Kenny, L. C. et al. (2013a) ‘Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Evidence from a Large Contemporary Cohort’, PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science, 8(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056583.
8. Koo, Y.-J. et al. (2012) ‘Pregnancy outcomes according to increasing maternal age’, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 51(1), pp. 60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.01.012.
9. Laopaiboon, M. et al. (2014) ‘Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment’, BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 121, pp. 49–56. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12659.
10. Lean, S. C. et al. (2017) ‘Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis’, PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186287.
11. Lisonkova, S. et al. (2017) ‘Maternal age and severe maternal morbidity: A population-based retrospective cohort study’, PLoS Medicine. Public Library of Science, 14(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002307.
12. Luke, B. and Brown, M. B. (2007) ‘Contemporary risks of maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age and plurality’, Fertility and Sterility, 88(2), pp. 283–293. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.008.
13. Mehari, M. A. et al. (2020b) ‘Advanced maternal age pregnancy and its adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes in Ayder comprehensive specialized hospital, Northern Ethiopia, 2017: A comparative cross-sectional study’, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. BioMed Central, 20(1), pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2740-6.
14. Nebeb G, Salgedo W, Alemayehu Y. Antenatal care utilization in Debre Tabor, north West Ethiopia. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale). 2015;5(339):2161–0932.10003.Return to ref 2 in article,Google Scholar
15. Pawde, A. A., Kulkarni, M. P. and Unni, J. (2015) ‘Pregnancy in Women Aged 35 Years and Above: A Prospective Observational Study’, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 65(2), pp. 93–96. doi: 10.1007/s13224-014-0616-2.
16. Reynolds HW WEL, Tucker H (2006) Adolescentsâ™ use of Maternal and Child Health Services in Developing Countires. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 23: 6-16.