Abstract :

Indonesia is one of the most developed countries in Southeast Asia, there are many designers from Indonesia who have achieved success at the international level. The Indonesian fashion industry currently contributes 20% to the creative economy sector. In this case, the government also contributes to developing the country’s fashion industry in various ways by making policies, providing capital support, and carrying out digital transformation. The development of fashion today is quite rapid, various styles of clothing can change quickly. In addition, the use of technology can be said to be inseparable from human life today. Based on data, technology users in Indonesia continue to grow and are expected to continue to increase until 2025. Various kinds of special brands in Indonesia have sprung up to compete with their respective characteristics. Now there are many consumers who buy clothes with various brand choices online, whether in the marketplace or on social media. Marketplace income in terms of clothing is also experiencing a positive impact from sales of fashion products and in 2020, even during a pandemic, people prefer to buy fashion products over other products. Even in Bandung itself, fashion is a sector that contributes to PAD (Pendapatan Asli Daerah). Bandung is also often used as a benchmark for Indonesian fashion, known as Paris Van Java, which on the other hand also attracts tourists to come to Bandung. One brand that utilizes social media and marketplaces to market and sell its products is Dizayn, which was founded in 2018 in Bandung. In running its business, Dizayn experiences problems in terms of brand awareness from the market, this needs to be studied to increase Dizayn’s brand awareness to compete with existing competitors. This study aims to analyze Dizayn’s current condition, propose the right promotion mix for Dizayn and propose an implementation plan for the promotional mix solution that has been made. The promotion mix has 5 (five) variables there are of advertising, sales promotion, personal selling, public relations, and direct marketing. The hypotheses of this study are as follows: H1 advertising has a positive relationship with brand awareness, H2 sales promotion has a positive relationship with brand awareness, H3 personal selling has a positive relationship with brand awareness, H4 public relations has a positive relationship with brand awareness, H5 direct marketing has a positive relationship with brand awareness. This study uses multiple linear regression analysis to see the relationship between the independent variable, namely the promotion mix, and the dependent variable, namely brand awareness. The results shows that advertising, sales promotion, personal selling, and direct marketing have a positive relationship with brand awareness, which means that H1, H2, H3 and H5 are acceptable. The promotion mix that has a positive relationship, direct advertising and marketing has the highest significant value, namely 0.000, where this value is less than 0.05. Meanwhile, public relations have a negative relationship, which means that H4 is rejected or unacceptable, which has a significance value of 0.420. The contribution of this research to science is so that in the future this research can be a reference or reference to see the relationship between promotion mix and brand awareness in different industries and larger companies. So that future research continues to develop according to the times. In addition, the results of this research are also expected to be applied by Dizayn so that he can compete fairly in the fashion industry which in the future can increase the contribution of the fashion industry to the creative economy sector and do not rule out the possibility of adding jobs.

---

Keywords :

Brand awareness, Multiple Linear Regression Analysis, Promotion Mix.

---

References :

1. Ardia, “A GUIDE TO THE INDONESIAN FASHION INDUSTRY,” 4 November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://madeinindonesia.com/a-guide-to-the-indonesian-fashion-industry/.
2. I. Research, “Pertumbuhan Industri Tekstil dan Pakaian Jadi, 2011-2022,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.dataindustri.com/produk/tren-data-pertumbuhan-industri-tekstil-dan-pakaian-jadi/.
3. UII, “Industri Fashion Indonesia Optimis Tumbuh di Tengah Pandemi,” 9 July 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.uii.ac.id/industri-fashion-indonesia-optimis-tumbuh-di-tengah-pandemi/.
4. P. Ananda, “Menparekraf Sandiaga Ungkap Industri Fashion Salah Satu Tulang Punggung Ekonomi Kreatif Indonesia,” 30 November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.inews.id/travel/belanja/menparekraf-sandiaga-ungkap-industri-fashion-salah-satu-tulang-punggung-ekonomi-kreatif-indonesia.
5. N. Putri, “Ini Tren Fashion di 2022 yang Dipengaruhi oleh Perkembangan Teknologi,” 17 February 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.com/parapuan/read/533146918/ini-tren-fashion-di-2022-yang-dipengaruhi-oleh-perkembangan-teknologi.
6. Simbolon, “Daftar 3 Subsektor Ekonomi Kreatif Kota Bandung yang Berkontribusi untuk PAD,” 23 July 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/5020640/daftar-3-subsektor-ekonomi-kreatif-kota-bandung-yang-berkontribusi-untuk-pad.
7. Nursyabani, “Industri Fesyen Bandung Bangkit dengan Virtual Fashion Show,” 16 March 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ayobandung.com/fashion/pr-79716381/industri-fesyen-bandung-bangkit-dengan-virtual-fashion-show.
8. Kotler and K. L. Keller, Marketing Management (15th Edition), Boston: Pearson Education, 2016.
9. F. Laksana, Praktis Memahami Manajemen Pemasaran, Sukabumi: CV Al Fath Zumar, 2019.
10. Sunyoto, Dasar-dasar Manajemen Pemasaran (Konsep, Strategi dan Kasus), Jakarta: PT Buku Seru, 2019.
11. Limakrisna and T. P. Purba, Manajemen Pemasaran, Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Bisnis di Indonesia, jilid 2, Bogor: Mitra Wacana Media, 2017.
12. Assauri, Manajemen Pemasaran, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.
13. Buchari, Kewirausahaan, Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2006.
14. Tasruddin, “STRATEGI PROMOSI PERIKLANAN YANG EFEKTIF,” Jurnal Al-Khitabah, Vol. II, No. 1, pp. 107-116, 2015.
15. Kotler and G. Armstrong, “Principle of Marketing 17th Edition,” in Principle of Marketing 17th Edition, Harow, Pearson Education Limited, 2018, p. 424.
16. L. Keller, Strategic Brand Management, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2013.
17. Kumar and S. Patra, “DOES PROMOTION MIX REALLY HELP TO ENHANCE BRAND EQUITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW,” Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, p. 82, 2017.
18. Charanah and R. B. Njuguna, “THE EFFECTS OF PROMOTIONAL MIX TOOLS ON BRAND EQUITY AMONG HOSPITALS IN NAIROBI COUNTY,” International Journal of Sales, Retailing, and Marketing Vol.4 No. 6, pp. 47-48, 2015.
19. Montaner and J. M. Pina, “The effect of promotion type and benefit congruency on brand image.,” Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 24 (3), 2011.
20. E. Finley, “. Using Personal Selling Techniques in Embedded Librarianship.,” Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, , p. 5, 2013.
21. Shafi and C. Madhavaiah, “An empirical study on the impact of promotional mix elements on brand equity: a study of FMCG n India,” Madras University Journal Of Business And Finance, 1(2), pp. 46-56, 2013.
22. Sulistio and H. Semuel, “PENGARUH PROMOTION MIX TERHADAP BRAND AWARENESS PT HM SAMPOERNA TBK MELALUI PRODUK TERBARU SAMPOERNA A PLATINUM,” Jurnal Strategi Pemasaran Vol 5, No 2, pp. 1-7, 2018.
23. G. Smith, “Public Relations Identify and The Stakeholer-organizations relationship: A Revised Theoritical Position For Public Relations Scholarship,” Public Relations Review, pp. 838-845, 2012.
24. James and L. Rajendran, “Effect of public relation on customer loyalty with special reference to e-commerce portals.,” Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), p. 87, 2013.
25. F. Fasana and A. G. Haseena, “Promotional Mix as the Strategic Tool for Improving Brand Equity (A Case in Franchise Fast Food Restaurants in Sri Lanka),” International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, p. 7, 2017.
26. E. Harrison and J. F. Hair, ” The Use of Technology in Direct-Selling Marketing Channels: Digital Avenues for Dynamic Growth.,” Journal of Marketing Channels, 2017.
27. P. Widyasari and I. G. K. Warmika, “PENGARUH PROMOTION MIX TERHADAP CUSTOMER LOYALTY MELALUI BRAND EQUITY SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI,” E-Jurnal Manajemen, Vol. 8, No. 12, pp. 6910-6930, 2019.
28. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: CV Alfabeta, 2017.
29. Priyono, METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, Sidoarjo: Zifatama, 2008.
30. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods for Business 7th Edition, Chicester: LCSH, 2016.
31. Indrawan and P. Yaniawati, Metodologi Penelitian, Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2017.
32. Destryawan, “Tribun Bisnis,” 30 November 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2021/11/30/menparekraf-fashion-berkontribusi-20-persen-terhadap-sektor-ekonomi-kreatif.

33. Kemenperin, “Perluas Pasar Industri Fesyen Dalam Negeri Lewat Indonesia Fashion Week 2018,” 29 March 2018. [Online]. Available: https://kemenperin.go.id/artikel/19010/Perluas-Pasar-Industri-Fesyen-DalamNegeri-Lewat-Indonesia-Fashion-Week-2018.
34. B. Alexanrescu and M. Milandru, “PROMOTION AS A FORM OF COMMUNICATION OF THE MARKETING STRATEGY,” Sciendo, pp. 268-274, 2018.
35. Purwanto, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2016.