Abstract :

Background: The community in North Kolaka Regency already has an open system of household waste water disposal, but there are still many found in a damaged, cracked and even perforated condition. In addition, there are also those who make the channel not watertight by digging the soil in the form of a ditch. They also still use a stool that is not tight on one side. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk index of domestic wastewater pollution.

Method: This type of research is quantitative research with geographic information systems approach. Data was collected by survey method using questionnaires and observation sheets. The sample in this study was 5,320. Data analysis using equal interval on Quantum GIS application version 3.26.0.

Result: In the parameters of the safe suspect tank, most of the 5,320 respondents (99%) have an unsafe suspect septic tank, while 1% have a safe suspect tank. For the parameters of pollution due to the disposal of the contents of the septic tank, most of the 5,320 respondents (99.8%) are not safe against contamination of the contents of the septic tank, while 0.2% is classified as safe. And for the parameters of pollution due to waste water discharge channels from 5,320 respondents, most (73%) are classified as unsafe and the remaining 27% are classified as safe.

Conclusion: North Kolaka Regency 4 Districts with a risk index value are included in the moderate risk category, namely Tolala, Porehu, Central Pakue, and North Pakue Districts. 6 Districts are included in the high risk category, namely Batu Putih, Ngapa, Tiwu, Lasusua, Ranteangin, and Wawo Districts. While the other 5 sub-districts are in the very high category, namely Pakue, Watunohu, Kodeoha, Katoi, and Lambai sub-districts.

---

Keywords :

Domestic Wastewater, Risk IndeksGeographic Information System., Risk Pollution

---

References :

1. Kholif M Al. Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik. Surabaya: Sucopindo Media Pustaka; 2020. 1–187 p.
2. BPS Kabupaten Kolaka Utara. Kabupaten Kolaka Utara dalam Angka Tahun 2021. Lasusua: Statistik of Kolaka Utara Regency; 2021. 1–346 p.
3. Ganesan P. Review of Household use of Septic Tanks and Fecal Sludge Management in Rural India. Rapid Topi. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies; 2020.
4. Susilawaty A, Lagu AMH, Basri S, Maisari U, Amansyah M. Penilaian Risiko Sanitasi Lingkungan di Pulau Balang Lompo Kelurahan Mattiro Sompe Kecamatan Liukang Tupabbiring Kabupaten Pangkajene dan Kepulauan. Al-Sihah Public Health Sci J. 2018;10(2):204–15.
5. Jumakil, Sabilu Y, Tina L, Yuslina, Majid R, Zainuddin A. Pembuangan Sampah dan Dampaknya Terhadap Masyarakat di Kota Bau-Bau Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara. Prev J. 2019;4(1):13–6.
6. POKJA PPAS. Practical Guidelines for Implementation Environmental Health Risk Assement (EHRA) 2020-2024. Jakarta: Directorate of Environmental Health Ministry of Health R.I.; 2020. 1–83 p.
7. OSGeo foundation. Quantum GIS. Gary Sherman. 2022.
8. George hristine M, Oldja L, Biswas S, Perin J, Sack RB, Ahmed S, et al. Unsafe Child Feces Disposal is Associated with Environmental Enteropathy and Impaired Growth. J Pediatr. 2016;176(September):43–9.
9. Tahmina Parvin, Thomas ED, Bhuyian SI, Uddin IM, Hasan T, Rahman Z, et al. Contamination on the Household Compound and in Water Sources are Associated with Subsequent Diarrhea in Young Children in Urban Bangladesh (CHoBI7 Program). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;105(1):261–6.
10. Achmad BK, Jayadipraja EA, Sunarsih S. Hubungan Sistem Pengelolaaan (Konstruksi) Air Limbah Tangki Septik dengan Kandungan Escherichia Coli terhadap Kualitas Air Sumur Gali. J Keperawatan dan Kesehat Masy. 2020;9(1):24–36.
11. Sapulete MR. Hubungan Antara Jarak Septic Tank ke Sumur Gali dan Kandungan Escherichia Coli dalam Air Sumur Gali di Kelurahan Tuminting Kecamatan Tuminting Kota Manado. J Biomedik. 2010;2(3).
12. Holcomb DA, Jackie Knee TS, Adriano Z, Bruijn E de, Nalá R, Cumming O, et al. Human fecal contamination of water, soil, and surfaces in households sharing poor-quality sanitation facilities in Maputo, Mozambique. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;226:113496.
13. Widyarani, Wulan DR, Hamidah U, Komarulzaman A, Rosmalina RT, Sintawardani N. Domestic wastewater in Indonesia: generation, characteristics and treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:32397–32414.
14. Cronin AA, Breslin N, Gibson J, Pedley S. Monitoring source and domestic water quality in parallel with sanitary risk identification in Northern Mozambique to prioritise protection interventions. J Water Health. 2006;4(3):333–345.
15. Wang J, Zhang M ya, Liu J, Hu X min, He B shu. Using a targeted ecopharmacovigilance intervention to control antibiotic pollution in a rural aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ. 2019;696:134007.
16. Al-Ajalin FAH, Idris M, Abdullah SRS, Kurniawan SB, Imron MF. Effect of wastewater depth to the performance of short-term batching-experiments horizontal flow constructed wetland system in treating domestic wastewater. Environ Technol Innov. 2020;20:101106.
17. Wu H, Gao X, Wu M, Zhu Y, Xiong R, Ye S. The efficiency and risk to groundwater of constructed wetland system for domestic sewage treatment – A case study in Xiantao, China. J Clean Prod. 2020;277:123384.
18. Kumwimba MN, Zhu B, Moore MT, Wang T, Li X. Can vegetated drainage ditches be effective in a similar way as constructed wetlands? Heavy metal and nutrient standing stock by ditch plant species. Ecol Eng. 2021;166:106234.
19. Kumwimba MN, Li X, Wang W, Silva LHDKU De, Bao L, Mihiranga HKM, et al. arge-scale hybrid accidental urban wetland for polluted river purification in northern China: Evidence and implications for urban river management. Environ Technol Innov. 2021;22:101542.
20. Moeder M, Carranza-Diaz O, López-Angulo G, Vega-Aviña R, Chávez-Durán FA, Jomaa S, et al. Potential of vegetated ditches to manage organic pollutants derived from agricultural runoff and domestic sewage: A case study in Sinaloa (Mexico). Sci Total Environ. 2017;598:1106–15.