Abstract :
Background: Research using the Health Belief Model (HBM) is expected to be able to determine a determinant model of mental health behavior for Covid-19 survivors. The focus of HBM is Health Promotion at the individual level by looking at the protective and risk factors that are responsible for a person’s behavioral resistance. Until now there is no instrument that measures individual attitudes and beliefs based on the HBM for the mental health behavior of Covid-19 Survivors.
Method: To assess the validity and reliability of the Health Belief Model Questionnaire for Mental Health Behavior for COVID-19 Survivors. This study is an observational study with a cross sectional approach that presents the results of the validity and reliability of the Health Belief Model Questionnaire instrument for Mental Health Behavior for COVID-19 Survivors. The questionnaire was compiled as many as 16 statement items based on a literature review. The questionnaire consists of Perceptions of Seriousness, Perceptions of Vulnerability, Perceptions of Benefits, Perceptions of Barriers with 4 question items each. The sample size is 64 people. The validity test uses the Pearson Product Moment Correlation formula with a coefficient value of 0.3, while the reliability test uses internal consistency with Cronbach’s Alpha with a coefficient value of 0.7.
Results: The results of the descriptive analysis showed that the average age of Covid survivors was 18-40 years (78.1%), female (79.7%), undergraduate education level (75%), affected in wave II (54.7%) ). The results of the validity test of the 16 items contained 1 invalid item (perception of barriers), while the reliability test showed that of the 15 valid items the results were all reliable.
Conclusion: Overall, the HBM questionnaire is valid and reliable to measure mental health behavior in COVID-19 survivors.
Keywords :
COVID-19, Health Belief Questionnaire Model, Mental Health Behavior, Reliability., Validity.References :
- Integrated Report Our ESG [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://integratedreport.garrigues.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Garrigues-Integrated-Report-2020-en.pdf
- Halpin DMG, Singh D, Hadfield RM. Inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19: A systematic review and clinical perspective. Eur Respir J [Internet]. 2020;55(5). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01009-2020
- Li Q, Guan X, Wu P, Wang X, Zhou L, Tong Y, et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1199–207.
- World Health Organization. Gender and COVID-19: Advocacy brief. World Bank Res Obs. 2020;33(2):218–58.
- Mahase E. Coronavirus covid-19 has killed more people than SARS and MERS combined, despite lower case fatality rate. BMJ [Internet]. 2020;368(February):m641. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1136/bmj.m641
- Susanto AD, Rozaliyani A, Prasetyo B, Agustin H, Baskoro H, Arifin AR, et al. Epidemiological and clinical features of covid-19 patients at national emergency hospital wisma atlet kemayoran, jakarta, Indonesia. Kesmas. 2021 Jul;16(1):11–6.
- Upadhyay R, Sweta, Singh B, Singh U. Psychological impact of quarantine period on asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2020;2(1):100061.
- Taylor S. The Psychology of Pandemics. Vol. 18, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2022. p. 581–609.
- Chamaa F, Bahmad HF, Darwish B, Kobeissi JM, Hoballah M, Nassif SB, et al. PTSD in the COVID-19 Era. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(12):2164–79.
- Alimoradi Z, Broström A, Tsang HWH, Griffiths MD, Haghayegh S, Ohayon MM, et al. Sleep problems during COVID-19 pandemic and its’ association to psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;36.
- Conner M, Norman P. Health Psychology. Sci Direct. 2022;5–23.
- Gao Y dong, Ding M, Dong X, Zhang J jin, Kursat Azkur A, Azkur D, et al. Risk factors for severe and critically ill COVID-19 patients: A review. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;76(2):428–55.
- Fang X, Li S, Yu H, Wang P, Zhang Y, Chen Z, et al. Epidemiological, comorbidity factors with severity and prognosis. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(13):12493–503.
- Scales PC, Benson PL, Oesterle S, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Pashak TJ. The dimensions of successful young adult development: A conceptual and measurement framework. Appl Dev Sci [Internet]. 2016;20(3):150–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1082429
- Pivonello R, Auriemma RS, Pivonello C, Isidori AM, Corona G, Colao A, et al. Sex Disparities in COVID-19 Severity and Outcome: Are Men Weaker or Women Stronger? Neuroendocrinology. 2021;111(11):1066–85.
- Mege JL, Bretelle F, Leone M. Sex and bacterial infectious diseases. New Microbes New Infect [Internet]. 2018;26:S100–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2018.05.010
- Wray S, Arrowsmith S. The Physiological Mechanisms of the Sex-Based Difference in Outcomes of COVID19 Infection. Front Physiol. 2021;12(February):1–12.
- Lakbar I, Luque-Paz D, Mege JL, Einav S, Leone M. COVID-19 gender susceptibility and outcomes: A systematic review. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(11 November):1–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241827
- Bian L, Gao Q, Gao F, Wang Q, He Q, Wu X, et al. Impact of the Delta variant on vaccine efficacy and response strategies. Expert Rev Vaccines [Internet]. 2021;20(10):1201–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2021.1976153
- Grant R, Charmet T, Schaeffer L, Galmiche S, Madec Y, Von Platen C, et al. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant on incubation, transmission settings and vaccine effectiveness: Results from a nationwide case-control study in France. Lancet Reg Heal – Eur. 2022;13:1–12.
- Rella SA, Kulikova YA, Dermitzakis ET, Kondrashov FA. Rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and vaccination impact the fate of vaccine-resistant strains. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2021;11(1):1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95025-3
- Rosenstock IM. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Heal Educ Behav. 1974;2(4):328–35.
- -E. N, I.K. S, I.C. LA, O. C, G.T. J, Balatsoukas P. AO – Niculaescu Isabel Karen; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-1054 AO – Landa-Avila, Irma Cecilia; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6107-6736 AO – Colak, Ozlem; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-2561 AO – Jun, Gyuchan CEO https://orcid. org/000. 0002 8971 0812 AOS. Using the Health Belief Model to design a questionnaire aimed at measuring people’s perceptions regarding COVID-19 immunity certificates. medRxiv [Internet]. 2021;1–14. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/%0Ahttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=empp&NEWS=N&AN=2015874039
- Coe AB, Elliott MH, Gatewood SBS, Goode JVR, Moczygemba LR. Perceptions and predictors of intention to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2022;18(4):2593–9.
- Chu H, Liu S. Integrating health behavior theories to predict American’s intention to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;104(February):1878–86.
- Suyanto S, Kandel S, Kemal RA, Arfianti A. The Quality of Life of Coronavirus Disease Survivors Living in Rural and Urban Area of Riau Province, Indonesia. Infect Dis Rep. 2022;14(1):33–42.