Abstract :

This research is motivated by the inequality of land ownership and policies regarding restrictions on land ownership. However, existing policies have not been able to resolve the problem of inequality in land ownership. The study was conducted using a qualitative approach with a perspective theoretical instrument policy. Primary data was obtained from observation during three months of study fields and interviews with a profound amount of key informants, the head of Government, the village chief, local peasants/local people, and communities. Research results show that the instrument policy of land that is used is not using a practical instrument such as land value reference, added value capturing, and land taxation. Land value reference, added value capturing, and land taxation can be used to reduce land inequality in Bandung Regency. Land value reference will create land market transparency, added value capturing will reduce the appearance of land speculators, and land taxation will effectively deter the person ruling the land. Instruments policy of land practically contributes to reducing idle lands, increasing the growth of the economy, creating field jobs, adding state income, reducing inequality in the economy, and improving the well-being of people.

---

Keywords :

Inequality of land ownership., Instrument policies, Instruments policy of land

---

References :

1. Albertus, Michael, Thomas Brambor, and Ricardo Ceneviva. 2018. “Land Inequality and Rural Unrest: Theory and Evidence from Brazil.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (3): 557–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716654970.
2. Askew, Janet. 2018. “A British Perspective on Added Value Capture: Ups and Downs during Its History.”
3. Blank, Joshua D., and Ari Glogower. 2021. “Progressive Tax Procedure.”
4. Chao, Tzuyuan Stessa. 2018. “A Taiwan Perspective on Reference Land Values: The Hare and the Hedgehogs – Chasing Real Price Levels with Public Market Information.”
5. Dye, Thomas R. 2017. Understanding Public Policy. Understanding Public Policy.
6. 2016. “Implementasi Kebijakan Redistribusi Tanah Obyek Landreform Di Desa Lalombi.” Katologis 4 (1): 127–39.
7. Gerber, Jean David, Andreas Hengstermann, and Thomas Hartmann. 2018. Instruments of Land Policy. Instruments of Land Policy. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315511658-3.
8. Hubungan Masyarakat Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2007. “Joyo Winoto : Ketimpangan Kepemilikan Aset Sebagai Penyebab Kemiskinan.” Universitas Gadjah Mada. 2007.
9. Kalbro, Thomas, and Leif Norell. 2018. “A Swedish Perspective on Reference Land Values: Transparency by Tax Policy.”
10. Knoepfel, Peter, Corrine Larrue, Frederic Varone, and Michael Hill. 2011. “Public Policy Analysis.”
11. Kraft, Michael E, and Scott R Furlong. 2021. Public Policy.
12. Layard, Antonia. 2018. “A British Perspective on Land Taxation: Politically Unpopular.”
13. Löhr, Dirk. 2018. “A German Perspective on Land Taxation: Political Inertia and Debates on Social and Distributional Aspects.”
14. Luca, Giacomo de, and Petros G. Sekeris. 2012. “Land Inequality and Conflict Intensity” 150 (1–2): 119–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-010-9692-8.
15. Luthfi, Ahmad Nashih. 2018. “Reforma Kelembagaan Dalam Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Era Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla [Institutional Reform in the Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla Era of Agrarian Reform Policy].” Bhumi, Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 4 (2): 153. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i2.276.g252.
16. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2021. 2021. “Penyelenggaraan Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum,” no. 086995: 1–112.
17. Pujriyani, Dwi Wulan, Sri Suharyono, Ibnul Hayat, and Fatimah Azzahra. 2016. “Sampai Kapan Pemuda Bertahan Di Pedesaan? Kepemilikan Lahan Dan Pilihan Pemuda Untuk Menjadi Petani.”
18. Ramdani, Muhammad Febri. 2020. “Implementasi Kebijakan Agraria Dan Ketimpangan Penguasaan Lahan (Kasus Lahan Eks HGU Di Desa Cipeuteuy, Kecamatan Kabandungan, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat).” Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat [JSKPM] 4 (6): 731–66. https://doi.org/10.29244/jskpm.v4i6.728.
19. Shohibuddin, Mohamad. 2019a. “Meluruskan Narasi Ketimpangan Agraria.” 2019.
20. ———. 2019b. “Memahami Dan Menanggulangi Persoalan Ketimpangan Agraria (2).” BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 5 (2): 136–49. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v5i2.366.
21. ———. 2019c. “Memahami Dan Menanggulangi Persoalan Understanding and Overcoming the Problem Of.” Bhumi, Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 5 (2): 136–49.
22. Suhendar, Endang. 1995. Ketimpangan Penguasaan Tanah Di Jawa Barat. Bandung.
23. Thiel, Fabian, and Fabian Wenner. 2018. “Land Taxation in Estonia An Efficient Instrument of Land Policy for Land Scarcity, Equity, and Ecology.”
24. Viallon, François-Xavier. 2018. “Added Value Capturing in Switzerland How Much Is Enough?”
25. Voß, Winrich, and Jörn Bannert. 2018. “Reference Land Value in Germany ; Land Policy by Market Transparency.”
26. Wegerif, Marc C.A., and Arantxa Guereña. 2020. “Land Inequality Trends and Drivers.” Land 9 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9040101.
27. Yin, Robert K. 2015. Studi Kasus Desain & Metode. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.