Abstract :

The cosmetic industry in Indonesia continues to experience rapid growth, in line with high consumer demand and the widening cosmetic market. In 2021, based on data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS), cosmetics will grow by 9.61%. One of Indonesia’s well-respected cosmetic manufacturing companies is PT. Cedefindo, which is part of the Martha Tilaar Group. Martha Tilaar Group is one of the local pioneers in the Indonesian beauty industry. There are very large numbers and types of packaging in the warehouse of PT. Cedefindo. Due to the wide range of products, there are a number of risks associated. As a result of redesigns and product discontinuation, a lot of unused packaging material has accumulated in the storage facility. Deadstock and unused packaging materials can disrupt the flow in the warehouse, increasing costs and reducing available storage space. Delays in delivering packaging materials to the production line are a further risk that could be triggered by flow disturbances. Given this potential risk, the company must identify potential risks in every packaging material warehouse activity. Currently, PT. Cedefindo has not examined every action in the packaging material warehouse to identify risks. Risk identification is very important because it will enable the company to develop plans to minimize harmful events before they arise, without proper risk identification, no mitigation strategy can be devised. This research was conducted by identifying warehouse activities, mapping them into (SCOR) and identifying risks using House of Risk Phase 1. The first stage of the House of Risk process is the identification of risk events and risk agents. Next, the severity and occurrence levels are measured, and the aggregate risk priority (ARP) value is calculated to determine which risk agents should be prioritized based on the Pareto diagram. There are 18 risk agents and 15 risk events have been identified as a result of this research, 6 risk agents were given the highest priority based on the Pareto diagram, and 2 risk agents were identified as having a high-risk level and being in the red zone, requiring immediate direct action.

---

Keywords :

Cosmetic, House of Risk, Packaging Material, Risk Management, Warehouse.

---

References :

1. Ahyudanari, Ervina and Doddy Arief Wibowo. (2020). The 1st International Conference on Business and Engineering Management (Application of House of Risk (Hor) Models for Risk Mitigation of Procurement in The Balikpapan Samarinda Toll Road Project 2020). International Conference on Business and Engineering Management (IConBEM 2020), 7 (3.21)
2. APICS, Supply Chain Operations Reference Model: SCOR Version 12.0, Chicago: APICS, 2017.
3. British Standard Instituiton. ISO 31000, 2018. Risk Management – Guidelines.
4. Chopra dan Sodhi, 2004. Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability: Tools and Methods for Supply chain management.
5. Editorial Team, Indeed. (2022, May 26). 5 Key Risk Mitigation Strategies from https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/risk-mitigation-strategies
6. Elisabeth,   A.  (2018,  Oktober  9).  Peran  Kemasan  dan  Label  Produk  Pangan terhadap  Minat  Beli  Konsumen.  Retrieved Mei 8, 2021, from Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi:

https://balitkabi.litbang.pertanian.go.id/infotek/peran-kemasan-dan-label- produk-pangan-terhadap-minat-beli-konsumen/

7. Harjono, Heru. (2019). WAREHOUSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND ITS IMPACT ON DATA ACCURACY. Digital Literacy President University, 1-2.
8. Nanda, L., Hartanti, L. P., & Runtuk, J. K. (2014). Analisis Risiko Kualitas Produk dalam Proses Produksi Miniatur Bis dengan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Pada Usaha Kecil Menengah Niki Kayoe. Jurnal Gema Aktualita, (pp.75).
9. Palaniappan, Dr. Pl. K and Faizal. (2014). Risk Assessment and Management in Supply Chain. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering: G Industrial Engineering, Vol. 14, Issue 2 ISSN 0975 – 5861.
10. Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of Risk: a Model for Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management. Bussiness Process Management Journal, 15(6), 952-968.
11. Reinschmidt, Kenneth. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2005. The Owner’s Role in Project Risk Management. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11183.
12. Sari, Diana Puspita, Zahra Lutfia and Icha Putri (2018). PERENCANAAN MITIGASI RISIKO AKTIVITAS PENGADAAN BAHAN BAKU PADA CV. DINASTI SEMARANG. Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, Vol. 13, No 13.
13. Shahin, A. (2004). Integration of FMEA and the Kano Model. International Journal of Quality& Reliability Management, (pp.733).
14. Webb, (2019, February 27). Warehouse Risk Management: Is Your Facility Secure? From

https://www.clearrisk.com/risk-management-blog/is-your-warehouse-secure