Abstract :

Within the COVID-19 move to online instruction, numerous educator teachers have looked for out video conference innovations (such as zoom) pointing to reproduce conventional classrooms online. At confront esteem, synchronous video shows up to offer more prompt replicability of existing face to face synchronous teaching. However, moving academically from one medium to another is not continuously a smooth move. The COVID-19 situation has constrained pressing moves, and without satisfactory openings to plan for a modern medium, a few teaches have struggled. Higher instruction (HE) has seen a developing drift towards online study. Be that as it may, educating is profoundly associated to one’s beliefs, values, and commitments and to connections with understudies. A change in the mode of instruction and instructional method has the potential to disrupt these profound and individual associations giving rise to an emotional reaction.  In later times, unsettling influences, such as pandemics, common calamities, and social distress have put colleges in unsteady circumstances, influencing instructive forms. The length of unsteady circumstances is unusual and can be weeks or a long time. In spite of these disturbances, colleges have to be proceed to satisfy their mission to teach youthful individuals. In arrange to examine the relocation to online learning beneath the COVID-19 widespread and look at understudy and workforce recognitions and lessons learned, a writing think about on flexible organizations and scholastic progression and a case study of the International University of Management.

 

---

Keywords :

COVID-19, Examination results, High institution, Online and Learning

---

References :

1. Al-Balas, M., Hasan Ibrahim, A.-B., Jaber, H. M., Obeidat, K., Al-Balas, H., Aborajooh, E. A., Al-Taher, R., & Al-Balas, B. (2020). Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: Current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 20, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02257-4.
2. Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-Learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216.

3. Bailey S, Hendricks S, Applewhite S (2015) Student perspectives of assessment strategies in online courses. J Interact Online Learn 13(3):112–125 Retrieved from: https://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v13/n3/student-perspectives-of-assessment-html
4. Bryson, J. R., & Andres, L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: Curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 44(4), 608–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478.
5. Bilen, E. & Matros, A. (2020). Online cheating amid COVID-19 J Econ Behav Org, 182. 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.12.004
6. Chan, C. B., & Wilson, O. (2020). Using chakowa’s digitally enhanced learning model to adapt face-to-face EAP materials for online teaching and learning. International Journal of TESOL Studies. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.10.
7. Clark, T.M, Callam, C.S, Paul, N.M, Stoltzfus, M.W, &D. Turner, D. (2020). Testing in the time of COVID-19: a sudden transition to unproctored online exams J Chem Educ, 97 (9). 1021/acs.jchemed.0c00546
8. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni,P., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy   response J Appl Learn Teach, 3 (1)  37074/jalt.2020.3.1.
9. Darren , T., Chugh, R. & Luck, J.  (2021). Transitioning to E-Learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have Higher Education Institutions responded to the challenge?Cited from https://link.springer.com/article/1007/s10639-021-10633-w
10. Daumiller, R. Rinas, J. Hein, S. Janke, O. Dickhäuser, M. Dresel (2021). Shifting from Face-to-face to online teaching during COVID-19: The role of university faculty Achieve ment goals for attitudes towards this sudden change, and their relevance  for burnout/engagement and student evaluations of teaching quality Computers   in Human Behaviour, 118.  Article 106677, 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106677
11. Davies, J. A., Davies, L. J., Conlon, B., Emerson, J., Hainsworth, H., & McDonough, H. G. (2020). Responding to COVID-19 in EAP contexts: A comparison of courses at four Sino-foreign universities. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 32–52.
12. Elzainy A., El Sadik A., Al Abdulmonem W. (2020). Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the college of medicine, Qassim University. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. 2020;15(6):456–462. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.09.005.
13. Gamage, K.A., Silva, E.K.D,. & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online delivery and assessment during COVID-19: safeguarding academic integrityEduc Sci, 10 (11).  3390/educsci10110301
14. Garris, C. P., & Fleck, B. (2020). Student evaluations of transitioned-online courses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000229.
15. Gelles L.A., Lord S.M., Hoople G.D., Chen D.A., Mejia J.A. (2020). Compassionate flexibility and self-discipline: Student adaptation to emergency remote teaching in an integrated engineering energy course during COVID-19. Education Sciences. 2020;10(11):304. doi: 10.3390/educsci10110304.
16. Gros, B., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Future trends in the design strategies and technological affordances of e-learning. In: Spector M., Lockee B., Childress M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_67-1.
17. Hartshorn, K. J., & McMurry, B. L. (2020). The Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ESL learners and TESOL practitioners in the United States. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 140–157.
18. Holden, O., Kuhlmeier, V.A., & Norris, M. (2020). Academic integrity in online testing: a research review. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/rjk7g.
19. Janghorban, R., Latifnejad Roudsari, R., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies, 9, 24152. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.24152.
20. Kaur, N., Dwivedi, D., Arora, J., & Gandhi, A. (2020). Study of the effectiveness of e-learning to conventional teaching in medical undergraduates amid COVID-19 pandemic. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 10(7), 563–567. https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2020.10.04096202028042020.
21. Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516661713.
22. Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235.
23. Larasati, P., & Santoso, H. (2017). Interaction Design Evaluation and Improvements of Cozora – A Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Learning Application. 2017 7Th World Engineering Education Forum (WEEF). 536–541.https://doi.org/10.1109/weef.2017.8467168.
24. Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020). An exploratory study of the obstacles for achieving quality in distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(9), 232.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232.

25. Lim, F. P. (2017). An analysis of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in e-learning. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 143(46), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2017.143.46.
26. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Qiao, W., Zhou, L., & Coates, H. (2020). Ensuring the sustainability of university learning: Case study of a leading Chinese university. Sustainability, 12(17), 6929. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176929.
27. Lowenthal, P. R., Dunlap, J. C., & Snelson, C. (2017). Live synchronous web meetings inasynchronous online courses: Reconceptualising virtual office hours. Online Learning, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1285.
28. Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012). The benefits and challenges of using systematic reviews in international development research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711342.

29. Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of covid-19 on higher education around the world International Association of Universities
30. McDaniels, M., Pfund, C., & Barnicle, K. (2016). Creating dynamic learning communities in synchronous online courses: One approach from the Center for the Integration of Research, Teaching and Learning (CIRTL). Online Learning, 20(1), 110–129.
31. Mitchell, J. E. (2020). How do we think about labs and practical skills in an online context? In: Gibbs, B. & Wood, G. C., eds. Emerging Stronger: Lasting Impact from Crisis Innovation. Godalming: Engineering Professors’ Council. 35.
32. Moralista, R., & Oducado, R.M. (2020). Faculty perception toward online education in higher education during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemicUniv J Educ Res, 8 (10) (2020), pp. 4736-4742, 10.13189/ujer.2020.081044
33. Mouchantaf, M. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges faced and lessons learnedregarding distance learning in Lebanese higher education institutions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1010.11.
34. Nicol, D (2008), Technology-supported assessment: A review of research. Unpublished manuscript available at

http://www.reap.ac.uk/Portals/101/Documents/REAP/Technology_supported_assessment.pdf

35. Ożadowicz A. (2020). Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown—building automation courses case study. Education Sciences. 2020;10(10):292. doi: 10.3390/educsci10100292.
36. Pei L., Wu H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online. 2019;24(1):1666538.

doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538.

37. Rizun, M., & Strzelecki, A. (2020). Students’ Acceptance of the COVID-19 impact on shifting higher education to distance learning in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18),6468.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186468.

38. Romero-Ivanova, C., Shaughnessy, M., Otto, L., Taylor, E., & Watson, E. (2020). Digital practices & applications in a Covid-19 culture. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 80– https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p80.
39. Sahbaz, A. (2020). Views and evaluations of university students about distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2020.93.5.
40. Sales, D., Cuevas-Cerveró, A., & Gómez-Hernández, J.-A. (2020). Perspectives on the information and digital competence of Social Sciences students and faculty before and during lockdown due to Covid-19. Professional de la Information, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.23.
41. Schmidt, S. W., Tschida, C. M., & Hodge, E. M. (2016). How faculty learn to teach online: What administrators need to know? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 19(1), 1–10.
42. Tartavulea, C. V., Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Dieaconescu, R. I., & Petre, S. (2020). Online teaching practices and the effectiveness of the educational process in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 920–936. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/920.
43. Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23–32.
44. Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15–35.