Abstract :

Background: The most common dental health problem in Indonesia is dental caries. The prevalence of caries by 92.2% and ages 35-44 years experienced dental health problems, with the DMF-T index of 6.9 meaning the average number of tooth decay was 6 to 7 teeth per person. One effort that can be carried out to prevent caries is to pay attention to the cleanliness of the oral cavity area especially teeth, plaque cleaning every day is by brushing teeth. Inappropriate brushing techniques can lead to the removal of tooth roots by transferring gingival margin bonds to the apical position of the cementoenamel junction which can result in tooth abrasion and gingival recession. The purpose of this study was to determine the cervical abrasion and gingival recession in dental polyclinic patients at the Pertamedika Clinic Office Center.

Method: This study used a descriptive method. The sample of this study was using purposive sampling as many as 54 respondents. The data used are secondary data taken from the patient’s medical record.

Results: The results of cervical abrasion studies showed that 25 people (46.3%) did not have cervical abrasion and 29 people (53.7%) had cervical abrasion. Respondents did not have gingival recession of 26 people (48.1%) and those who had gingival recession were 28 people (51.9%).

Conclusions: Most of the Pertamedika Center Office clinic patients have cases of cervical abrasion and gingival recession.

---

Keywords :

Cervical abrasion, Gingival recession.

---

References :

1. Kemenkes RI. Pedoman Paket Dasar Pelayanan Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut di Puskesmas. Jakarta Direktorat Jenderal Upaya Kesehat Kemenkes RI 2012.
2. Depkes RI. Pedoman Paket dasar Pelayanan Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut di Puskesmas. Jakarta TP 2011;201:l.
3. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Pedoman Pemeliharaan Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut Ibu Hamil dan Anak Usia Balita Bagi Tenaga Kesehatan di Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan. 2012.
4. Ramdiani D, Yulita I, Sasongko BG, Purnama T. Required Treatment Index (RTI) Pada Pasien Dewasa Di Klinik Dokter Gigi Tjang Riyanto Cahyadi Kota Bogor. JDHT J Dent Hyg Ther 2020;1:55–60.
5. Kemenkes R. Permenkes No 89 tahun 2015 tentang Upaya Kesehatan Gigi dan Mulut. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia; 2015.
6. Kemenkes RI. Hasil utama riskesdas 2018. Jakarta.
7. Sitanaya RI. Pengaruh teknik menyikat gigi terhadap terjadinya abrasi pada servikal gigi. Media Kesehat Gigi Politek Kesehat Makassar 2017;16.
8. Imber J-C, Kasaj A. Treatment of gingival recession: when and how? Int Dent J 2021;71:178–87.
9. Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Erosive Tooth Wear 2014;25:32–45.
10. Kalangie P, Gunawan P, Anindita PS. Gambaran Abrasi Gigi Ditinjau Dari Metode Menyikat Gigi Pada Masyarakat Di Lingkungan II Kelurahan Maasing Kecamatan Tuminting Kota Manado. Pharmacon 2016;5:50–9.
11. Ngatemi N, Erna Sariana. Hubungan Karakteristik dan Kebiasaan Menyikat Gigi dengan Kejadian Abrasi Gigi Pada Pegawai Yayasan Masjid Al-ikhlas Cilandak Jakarta. ARKESMAS (Arsip Kesehat Masyarakat) 2020;4:185–90. https://doi.org/10.22236/arkesmas.v4i2.3746.
12. Ravipudi S, Appukuttan D, Prakash PSG, Victor DJ. Gingival recession: short literature review on etiology, classifications and various treatment options. J Pharm Sci Res 2017;9:215.
13. Chrysanthakopoulos NA. Gingival recession: prevalence and risk indicators among young greek adults. J Clin Exp Dent 2014;6:e243.
14. Ulfah N, Augustina EF. Perawatan resesi gingiva dengan bedah dan non-bedah. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci 2010;9:29. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v9i1.229.
15. Notoatmodjo S. Metodologi penelitian kesehatan 2010.
16. Maulani C. Tingkat resesi gingiva menggunakan bulu sikat gigi lembut dan sedang pada mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas YARSI. J Kedokt Yars 2017;25:1–9.
17. AH A. Perbedaan tingkat keparahan resesi gingiva masyarakat dataran tinggi dan masyarakat pesisir pantai (Studi kasus masyarakat Kecamatan Camba dan Kecamatan Bontoa Kabupaten Maros tahun 2014). Makassar Univ Hasuddin 2014.