Abstract :

Linguistic aesthetics is seen from the linguistic side with a critical view. The text is built from several linguistic tools in which there are ideology and power. This study aims to find and describe (1) vocabulary, (2) the beauty of metaphor, (3) grammar in Indonesian and Malaysian poetry. The literary approach used is a comparative literature approach. This research data is in the form of a poetry text consisting of vocabulary, phrases, and lines with certain ideological values. Data collection activities were carried out using documentation techniques with knowledge and insight into the intrinsic and extrinsic elements of poetry, and critical discourse analysis of poetry, particularly concerning the ideological insights of women in Indonesian and Malaysian poetry, and interviews were conducted with the poets. Data analysis procedure using diagrams of the stages of understanding women’s ideology based on the elaboration of Ricoeur’s hermeneutics: explanation-analysis and interpretation. Triangulation was carried out to test theories, data, and research methods to avoid research bias. The findings of this study are the linguistic aesthetics of the poems by the Indonesian and Malaysian female poets in the form of (1) vocabulary, (2) the beauty of metaphor, and (3) grammatical. This study strengthens the theory of critical discourse analysis because the findings of this study indicate that linguistic aesthetics describes three stages: description, interpretation, and explanation. Practically, these findings are useful for language and literature researchers to enrich the application of critical poetry to poetry.

---

Keywords :

Aesthetics, ideology, Indonesian Poetry, Linguistics, Malaysian Poetry

---

References :

1. Al Zuraigat, A. M., & Hussein H, Z. (2020). A Study on the Poetic Patterns in Laila Al-Atrash’s Novel a Woman unlike Herself. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 7 (4), p. 39-45. DOI:10.30845/ijll.v7n4p5
2. Darma, Y. A. (2013a). Analisis Wacana Kritis. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
3. Darmono, S. D. (2014). Pegangan Penelitan Sastra Bandingan. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
4. Mulyono, T., Agus, N., Rustono., & Suminto, A, S. (2018). The Linguistic Features of Indonesian Children Poetry. International Journal of Humanity Studies, Vol. 1, (2), pp. 228-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2018.010208
5. Pastika, I. W. (2009). Kekuatan Lingual Puisi-Puisi Masuri S.N. Linguistika: Buletin Ilmiah Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana, Vol 16, Publisher: Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana. DOI: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/linguistika/article/view/307/250
6. Preece, J and Rees, A 2021 How Bilingual Novelists Utilize their Linguistic Knowledge: Towards a Typology of the Contemporary ‘Modern Languages Novel’ in English. Modern Languages Open, 2021(1): 2 pp. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo. v0i0.378
7. Ratih, R. (2011). Citra Perempuan Indonesia di Tengah Kekuasaan Budaya Patriarkhi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
8. Salleh, M. H. (2000). Puitika Sastera Melayu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
9. Santoso, A. (2003). Bahasa Politik Pasca Orde Baru. Jakarta: Penerbit Wedatama Widya Sastra (WWS).
10. Santoso, A. (2012). Studi Bahasa Kritis: Menguak Bahasa Membongkar Kuasa. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
11. Tjahjono, T., & Vidiyanti, M.O., (2021). Konstruksi religiositas tubuh dalam puisi indonesia. Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya, 49(1), 13–27. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v49i12021p013
12. Waluyo. (2002). Apresiasi Puisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pusaka Utama.
13. Wodak, R. dan M. M. (2006). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. New Delhi: India Pvt Ltd.
14. Yunus, U. (1981). Puisi Indonesia dan Melayu Moder. Jakarta: Bahtera Karya Aksara.
15. Yuwono, U. (2008). Ketika Perempuan Lantang Menentang Poligami. Sebuah Analisis Wacana Kritis Tentang Wacana Antipoligami Jurnal Wacana, Vol 10(1), 1–25.