Abstract :

This qualitative scale research means to comprehend the act of distributive leadership among senior colleges as like chancellor deans and administrators. The scientist used a non-trial subjective, grounded hypothesis to look into the plan. Theoretical framework distributing leadership in a school network gives a chance for educators to impact important community-oriented or collaborative practices through shared authority. Spillane (2005) clarified that dispersed leadership is a point of view of a calculated or analytic instrument for pondering school authority. It’s anything but a definite diagram for viable authority, nor an expose of how the leader ought to be practiced and shared duties have been a guide in creating research questions. A solitary respondent included, which was the head of the department. The information was gathered utilizing meeting strategies dependent on semi-organized inquiries. Meeting information was dissected through a precise coding procedure to discover themes. In view of the examination of these topics, the most noteworthy subjects that developed reliably are hierarchical culture measurement, trailed by vision, strategic, authoritative objectives measurement, trailed by a common duty measurement, and the least is the element of initiative practices. The university vision, crucial, objectives were shared among individuals in the arranging and performance of exercises. Be that as it may, as a type of authority dependent on shared exercises, there are still spaces for improvements, for example, common trust, closeness, and sharing of obligations.

---

Keywords :

Distributed Leadership, Head of the Department, Management, Public University, Training.

---

References :

1. Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in education, 22(1), 31-34.
2. Dambrauskienė, D. (2018). Cha.llenges for the Distributed Leadership Development sof Education Institutions in a Hierarchical National Culture. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 79(1), 37-53.
3. Torres, D. G. (2019). Distributed leadership, professional collaboration, and teachers’ job satisfaction in US schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 111-123.
4. Iranzo-García, P., Camarero-Figuerola, M., Tierno-García, J. M., & Barrios-Arós, C. (2020). Leadership and professional identity in school teacher training in Spain (Catalonia). Journal of Education for Teaching, 1-15.
5. Patterson, J. A., AlSabatin, H., Anderson, A., Klepacka, M., Lawrence, J., & Miner, B. (2020). A Distributed Leadership Perspective on Implementing Instructional Reform: A Case Study of an Urban Middle School. Journal of School Leadership, 1052684620904942.
6. Naidu, P., & Derani, N. E. S. (2016). A comparative study on quality of education received by students of private universities versus public universities. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35(2016), 659-666.
7. Ismail Shinwari, Sariullah Sari, Farmanullah Sultani;(2020), The importance of leadership training for Head of Department: a study of a public university in Afghanistan; North American Academic Research, 3(4) 509-524, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3756270
8. du Plessis, A., & Eberlein, E. (2018). The Role of Heads of Department in the Professional Development of Educators: A Distributed Leadership Perspective. Africa Education Review, 15(1), 1-19.
9. Greany T (2018) Innovation is possible, it’s just not easy: Improvement, innovation and legitimacy in England’s autonomous and accountable school system. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(1): 65–85.
10. Amels J, Kru¨ger ML, Suhre C and van Veen K (2020) The effects of distributed leadership and inquiry-based work on primary teachers’ capacity to change: Testing a model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1080/09243453.2020.1746363.
11. Brown M, McNamara G, O’Hara J, Hood S, Burns D and Kurum G (2019) Evaluating the impact of distributed culturally responsive leadership in a disadvantaged rural primary school in Ireland. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 47(3): 457–474.
12. Woods PA (2016) Authority, power and distributed leadership. Management in Education 30(4): 155–160. Yeigh T, Lynch D, Turner D, Provost SC, Smith R and Willis RLR (2019) School leadership and school improvement: An examination of school readiness factors. School Leadership & Management 39(5): 434–456.
13. Holloway J, Nielsen A and Saltmarsch S (2017) Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46(4): 538–555.
14. Harris A and DeFlaminis J (2016) Distributed leadership in practice: Evidence, misconceptions and possibilities. Management in Education 30(4): 141–146.
15. Ross L, Lutfi GA and Hope WC (2016) Distributed leadership and teachers’ affective commitment. NASSP Bulletin 100(3): 159–169.
16. Gómez-Hurtado, I., González-Falcón, I., Coronel-Llamas, J. M., & García-Rodríguez, M. D. P. (2020). Distributing Leadership or Distributing Tasks? The Practice of Distributed Leadership by Management and Its Limitations in Two Spanish Secondary Schools. Education Sciences, 10(5), 122.
17. Mikalef, P., van de Wetering, R., & Krogstie, J. (2018, July). Big Data enabled organizational transformation: The effect of inertia in adoption and diffusion. In International Conference on Business Information Systems (pp. 135-147). Springer, Cham.
18. AlGhanem, N., Braganza, A., & Eldabi, T. (2019). Plural Leadership During Organisational Transformation Initiatives (Vertical & Horizontal). KnE Social Sciences, 90-108.
19. Manaze, M. (2019). Practice and Challenges of Distributed Leadership at Public Secondary Schools of Dessie City Administration. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 7(4).
20. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164.
21. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013:
22. Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management
23. Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
24. Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(3), 251-269.
25. du Plessis, A., & Eberlein, E. (2018). The Role of Heads of Department in the Professional Development of Educators: A Distributed Leadership Perspective. Africa Education Review, 15(1), 1-19.
26. Smith, B., S. (2016). The role of leadership style in creating a great school. SELU Research Review Journal, 1(1), 65-78.
27. Cambridge Assessment. International Education. (2017). Educational leadership. UCLES. Retrieved from: https://www.cambridgeinternational.org.
28. Yusuf, E., A. (2017). Effective leadership and change management for sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research, 4(2), 37-42.
29. Williams, C., & Lee, S. H. (2016). Knowledge flows in the emerging market MNC: The role of subsidiary HRM practices in Korean MNCs. International Business Review, 25, 233–243.
30. Khalid, N., Islam, D. M. Z., & Ahmed, M. R. M. (2019). SENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING ANDORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 590-593.
31. Samancioglu, M., Baglibel, M., & Erwin, B. J. (2020). Effects of Distributed Leadership on Teachers’ Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship. Pedagogical Research, 5(2), em0052. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/6439
32. Lahtero, T. J., Lång, N., & Alava, J. (2017). Distributed leadership in practice in Finnish schools. School Leadership & Management, 37(3), 217-233.