Abstract :
The study was done to identify the generic science skill improvement through guided scientific inquiry method video tracker analysis based. The method used in this study was quantitative pretest-posttest control group design. The samples of this were 52 students of the Physics Education Program of STKIP SoE. The instrument used in this study was a generic science skill test instrument on kinetic learning materials. The data analysis technique used was a t-test independent sample. The result of the study showed that students who learned guided scientific inquiry method video tracker analysis based were better than those who learned using the conventional method. This happened because the students were allowed to do the experiment that make the student freely understands generic science skill, thus making the learning process more interesting and meaningful. Therefore, it was suggested to use this method (guided scientific Inquiry method video tracker analysis based) in the process of learning in the classroom.
Keywords :
Generic Science; Kinematics; Mechanics; Tracker.References :
1. C. Sirisathitkul, P. Glawtanong, T. Eadkong, and Y. Sirisathitkul, “Digital video analysis of falling objects in air and liquid using tracker,” Rev. Bras. Ensino Fis., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2013, doi: 10.1590/s1806-11172013000100020.
2. R. Rivera, “Learning Physics with Video Analysis,” Nuevas Ideas en Informática Educ. TISE, pp. 121–125, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.tise.cl/volumen9/TISE2013/121-125.pdf.
3. M. G. Afifah, D. N., Yulianti, D., Agustina, N., Sri Lestari, R. D., & Nugraha, “Metode Sederhana Menentukan Percepatan Gravitasi Bumi Menggunakan Aplikasi Tracker Pada Gerak Parabola Sebagai Media dalam Pembelajaran Fisika.,” Pros. Simp. Nas. dan Pembelajaran Sains, vol. 2015, no. Snips, pp. 304–305, 2015.
4. J. A. Bryan, “Investigating the conservation of mechanical energy using video analysis: Four cases,” Phys. Educ., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2010, doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/45/1/005.
5. D. E. S. I. Asbanu, “Analisis Karakteristik Getaran Harmonik Sederhana dan Getaran Teredam Lemah Dengan Metode Analisis Video dan Logger Pro ,” pp. 33–39, 2016.
6. J. Bonato, L. M. Gratton, P. Onorato, and S. Oss, “Using high speed smartphone cameras and video analysis techniques to teach mechanical wave physics,” Phys. Educ., vol. 52, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361-6552/aa6f8c.
7. S. A. Fahrunnisa, Y. Rismawati, P. Sinaga, and D. Rusdiana, “Experiments of the law of conservation of mechanical energy using video tracker in high school learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1806, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012035.
8. V. L. B. de Jesus and D. G. G. Sasaki, “A Simple Experiment to Determine the Moments of Inertia of the Fidget Spinner by Video Analysis,” Phys. Teach., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 639–642, 2018, doi: 10.1119/1.5080587.
9. Z. Ješková, M. Kireš, M. Ganajová, and K. Kimáková, “Inquiry-based learning in science enhanced by digital technologies,” ICETA 2011 – 9th IEEE Int. Conf. Emerg. eLearning Technol. Appl. Proc., pp. 115–118, 2011, doi: 10.1109/ICETA.2011.6112597.
10. S. Handajani, H. Pratiwi, and M. Mardiyana, “The 21st century skills with model eliciting activities on linear program,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1008, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012059.
11. P. W. Sanggara, A. Doyan, and N. N. S. P. Verawati, “the Effect of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Model Based on Virtual Laboraory Toward Problem Solving Abilities of Physics Student,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2018, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v5i1.154.
12. T. Afriani, R. R. Agustin, and E. Eliyawati, “The Effect of Guided Inquiry Laboratory Activity with Video Embedded on Students’ Understanding and Motivation in Learning Light and Optics,” J. Sci. Learn., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 79–84, 2019, doi: 10.17509/jsl.v2i3.15144.
13. M. T. Sakliressy, W. Sunarno, and F. Nurosyid, “The Generic Science Skill Profile of High School on Theory Momentum and Impulse,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1842, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012058.
14. P. D. S. M. S. D. S. H. M.Si, “The Ability of Generic Science at Observation and Inference Logic Prospective Chemistry Teacher in Organic Chemistry Experiment,” Int. J. Sci. Res., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 2975–2980, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v4i5/SUB154947.pdf.
15. N. Khoiri, C. Huda, A. Rusilowati, Wiyanto, Sulhadi, and A. G. C. Wicaksono, “The impact of guided inquiry learning with digital swing model on students’ generic science skill,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 554–560, 2020, DOI: 10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26644.
16. J. W. Creswell, Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed Method, 3rd ed. Yogyakarta, 2013.
17. P. Hockicko, “Attractiveness of learning physics by means of video analysis and modeling tools,” Proc. 40th SEFI Annu. Conf. 2012 – Eng. Educ. 2020 Meet Futur., no. September, 2012.