Abstract :

This article deals with a literature review of internalizing Education of Sustainable Development (ESD) in Indonesia. The approach used in this research is a qualitative approach with a comparative descriptive method. Sustainable development is not only a way to overcome environmental crises, but also social and economic crises experienced in various parts of the world. One form of education that can have a major impact on development is Education for Sustainable. Development (ESD). Education for Sustainable Development enables every human being to acquire the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values needed to shape a sustainable future. The implementation of ESD in each school has various variations according to the school’s perception. The condition of the school background is correlated with efforts to implement ESD practices. The supporting factor for the implementation of ESD in elementary schools is if the school has a good concept and implementation related to aspects of school policy, school strategy, conception of implementing components and commitment to implementing activities. The inhibiting factor for the implementation of ESD in elementary schools is if the school does not have good policies and strategies related to ESD development and a low level of awareness regarding the conception and commitment to implementing ESD-based activities.

---

Keywords :

Behavior of Educational, Education for Sustainable Development

---

References :

1. Birdsall, S. (2014). Measuring student teachers’ understandings and self-awareness of sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 814–835.
2. Blakemore, S.-J. (2008). The social brain in adolescence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 267–277.
3. Bonnett, M. (1999). Education for sustainable development: a coherent philosophy for environmental education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(3), 313–324.
4. Borg, C., Gericke, N., Höglund, H.-O., & Bergman, E. (2014). Subject-and experience-bound differences in teachers’ conceptual understanding of sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 20(4), 526–551.
5. Breiting, S., & Mogensen, F. (1999). Action competence and environmental education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29(3), 349–353.
6. Buckler, C., & Creech, H. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development; final report. Unesco.
7. Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520.
8. Giddings, B., Hopwood, B., & O’brien, G. (2002). Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10(4), 187–196.
9. Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2002(96), 27–46.
10. Gough, S. (2002). Right answers or wrong problems? Towards a theory of change for environmental learning. The Trumpeter, 18(1).
11. Hopkins, C. (2012). Twenty years of education for sustainable development. SAGE Publications Sage India: New Delhi, India.
12. Isenhour, C. (2010). On conflicted Swedish consumers, the effort to stop shopping and neoliberal environmental governance. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 454–469.
13. Kebudayaan, K. P. D. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 84 Tahun 2014. Jakarta: KEMENDIKBUD.
14. Lijmbach, S., Van Arcken, M. M., Van Koppen, C. S. A., & Wals, A. E. J. (2002). “Your View of Nature is Not Mine!”: learning about pluralism in the classroom. Environmental Education Research, 8(2), 121–135.
15. Listiawati, N. (2013). Pelaksanaan Pendidikan untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Oleh Beberapa Lembaga. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 19(3), 430–450.
16. Mathew, R. V., & Panchanatham, N. 2016. An exploratory study on the development of women entrepreneurs: Moreno, L. A., De Henauw, S., Gonzalez-Gross, M., Kersting, M., Molnar, D.,
17. Gottrand, F., Barrios, L., Sjöström, M., Manios, Y., & Gilbert, C. C. (2008). Design and implementation of the healthy lifestyle in Europe by nutrition in adolescence cross-sectional study. International Journal of Obesity, 32(5) , S4–S11.
18. Olsson, D., Gericke, N., & ChangRundgren, S.-N. (2013). Young people and their integrated understanding of sustainable development. 10 th ESERA Conference in Nicosia, Cyprus 2-7 September.
19. Rauch, F. (2002). The potential of education for sustainable development for reform in schools. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 43–51. Rudsberg, K., & Öhman, J. (2010).
20. Pluralism in practice–experiences from Swedish evaluation, school development and research. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 95–111.
21. Schultz, P. W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1080–1083.
22. Sinakou, E., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Goossens, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2018). Academics in the field of Education for Sustainable Development: Their conceptions of sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 321–332.