Abstract :

Representative execution is a determinant of the advancement or decay of an organization, worker execution is impacted by a few variables including remuneration factors, inspiration factors, and work discipline factors, from these components we can see the organization’s usefulness, since representative execution will be straightforwardly corresponding to organization efficiency, on the off chance that representative execution expands, organization usefulness additionally increments, despite what might be expected assuming worker execution diminishes, organization efficiency likewise diminishes. The reason for this examination was to decide how the impact of pay, inspiration, and work discipline on worker execution at PT. Zulu Alpha Papa. This examination strategy utilizing subjective techniques with the number of tests utilized in this investigation were 120 respondents who were disseminated haphazardly to representatives of the PT. Zap head office. Inspecting strategy utilizing soaked example while information examination utilizing way investigation procedure (Path Model) which is upheld by Smart PLS programming variant 3.0. Because of this examination, the outcomes showed that there was a positive and huge impact among pay and worker execution, there was a positive and huge impact of inspiration on representative execution, there was a positive and huge impact of work discipline on worker execution, remuneration, inspiration, work discipline at the same time had a positive impact and important to worker execution.

---

Keywords :

Compensation, Employee Performance, Work Discipline, Work Motivation

---

References :

1. A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.
2. Perusahaan Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
3. Bangun, Wilson. (2012). “Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia”. Erlangga. Jakarta.
4. Dewi Patmawati dan Realize. (2018). The Effect Of Motivation and Dicipline Toward Performance Of Employee On PT. Perempurna Readymix Concrete. E-Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonomi Volume 6, E-ISSN 2613 – 9774. Indonesia.
5. Edy, Sutrisno. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Kencana Prenada Media Group. Jakarta.
6. Ghozali. dan Latan. (2015). Partial Least Squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0. Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Semarang.
7. Ghozali, Imam. (2006). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
8. Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang
9. Griffin, Ricky W. (2004). Manajemen. Jilid 1. Erlangga. Jakarta.
10. Hasibuan. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
11. Kasmir, (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Rajawali Pers. Depok.
12. Mulianto, Sindu, Cahyadi, Eko R., Widjayakusuma, M. Karebet. (2006). Panduan Lengkap Supervisi
13. Diperkaya Perspektif Syariah. PT Gramedia. Jakarta.
14. Rivai, Veithzal. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
15. Robbins, Stephen. P. (2006). Organizational Behavior. Indonesian edition. Gramedia. Jakarta.
16. Riyanto, S, Thamrin, M. (2020). The Effect of Work Motivation, Work Enviroment, and Work life Balance on Employee Performance at PT. Angkasa Pura I (Persero) Sultan Aji Muhammad Sulaiman Sepinggan Airport – Balikpapan. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSRJDMS), E-ISSN: 2279-0853, P-ISSN: 2279-0861. 19(6), 40-47. Indonesia.
17. Saluy, AB, Treshia, Y. (2018), Pengaruh motivasi kerja, disiplin kerja dan kompensasi terhadap kinerja karyawan (Studi Kasus di Perusahaan PT IE). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis, 2 (1), 53-70. Indonesia.
18. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta. Bandung.