Abstract :

Reading Comprehension serves as a crucial foundation for academic success, particularly for aspiring educators. Mastering the ability to comprehend complex academic texts is essential. This study delves into the challenges that first-year Bachelor in Elementary Education (BEED) students encounter in reading comprehension, aiming to identify specific difficulties they experience. The researchers employed a quantitative approach using the descriptive survey method for data collection, analysis, and classification. The study was conducted with 55 respondents from Siargao Island Institute of Technology, located at Pob. Brgy 12, Dapa, Surigao del Norte.The first part of the questionnaire gathered respondents’ profiles and was analyzed using count and percentage distribution, while the second and third parts were analyzed using mean and standard deviation. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to assess significant differences in the factors affecting reading comprehension challenges.Findings revealed significant insights into the reading habits and attitudes of first-year BEED students at SIIT. The majority of respondents, aged between 18 and 19, were predominantly female, and books were the most common reading material available to them. Most students reported reading sometimes. Results indicated a concerning trend in their attitudes towards reading, reflecting a lack of motivation. Data analysis demonstrated that age, sex, reading materials, and frequency of reading significantly influenced reading comprehension.Variables were ranked based on their impact, with vocabulary being the least influential (mean of 3.33), followed by interest in reading (mean of 3.38), fluency in reading (mean of 3.39), and availability of reading resources as the most influential (mean of 3.44). Further analysis indicated no significant difference in the influence of age on the variables. While sex did not show a significant difference in vocabulary and fluency in reading, it significantly impacted the availability of reading resources. The type of reading materials and frequency of reading did not show significant differences in their influence.Regarding correlation, vocabulary and fluency in reading exhibited low correlations across all variables. Availability and interest in reading also showed low correlations when paired with vocabulary and fluency. Interestingly, an inverse correlation was observed between availability and interest when reciprocated. The most challenging aspect of reading comprehension was identified as the availability of reading resources, as indicated by the highest mean score.In conclusion, this study highlights the need for interventions to enhance the reading attitudes and habits of first-year BEED students, particularly by improving the availability of reading resources to support their reading comprehension.

---

Keywords :

Academic Success, Availability of resources, Bachelor in Elementary Education, Reading attitudes, Reading challenges., reading comprehension, Reading Habits

---

References :

1. Clarke, J., Smith, A., & Johnson, M. (2014). Enhancing reading comprehension: Strategies for engaging students in meaning-making. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/6747/1/phd_thesis_ethesis_correct_pages

2. Dennis, J. (2011). The complex nature of reading comprehension: Balancing symbol recognition and interpretation. Journal of Educational Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication
3. Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-14017-001
4. English Language Teaching Guide. (2019). Overcoming challenges in reading comprehension: Identifying factors and applying strategies. Reading & Writing Quarterly. https://education.qld.gov.au/curriculums/Documents/literature-review.pdf
5. Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Understanding the components and processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/jse/article/view/9201/0
6. Hirsch, E. D. (2006). The importance of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
7. Kamhi, A. (2007). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349506620_The_Role_of_Background_Knowledge_in_Reading_ Comprehension_A_Critical_Review
8. Kendeou, P. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2372732215624707
9. McMaster, K. L., & Christ, T. J. (2016). Reading comprehension: Core components and processes. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2372732215624707
10. Odwan, T. A. A. (2012). The complexity of reading comprehension: Extracting and retrieving meaning from texts. Reading Research Quarterly. https://www.researchgate. net/publication/302884206_Reading_Comprehension
11. Silbert, L. (2014). Enhancing reading comprehension: Strategies for success. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254282574_ Effective_Practices_for_Developing_Reading_Comprehension
12. Tompkins, G. E. (2011). Understanding reading comprehension: The creative process of comprehending texts. Reading Research Quarterly. https://www. basicknowledge101.com/pdf/literacy/Reading%20comprehension
13. Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & White, M. J. (2012). Understanding reading comprehension: The interaction of automatic and strategic cognitive processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1). https://handinhandhomeschool.com/teaching