Abstract :
Cybrloafing in academic settings refers to students’ use of the internet for non-academic purposes during lectures, which can disrupt the learning process. This study aims to develop and validate the Academic Cyberloafing Scale to measure this behavior among students. Methods: The scale was developed based on the theory of Akbulut et al. (2016) and initially consisted of 56 items. Content validity testing was conducted through expert judgment (CVI and CVR analysis), followed by item discrimination and reliability testing. A sample of 45 college students participated in the item discrimination test, and the reliability test was conducted using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: The validation process resulted in 31 valid items with high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.957). Conclusion: The validated Academic Cyberloafing Scale provides a reliable measurement tool for assessing cyberloafing behavior among students. The study highlights the need for universities to implement strategies to manage internet use during lectures and minimize its negative effects on learning.
Keywords :
academic settings, cyberloafing, student behaviorReferences :
- Akbulut, Y. (2016). Computers in Human Behavior In search of a measure to investigate cyberloa fi ng in educational settings. Journal Homepage, 55, 616–625
- Arabaci, I. B. (2017). Investigation Faculty of Education Students’ Cyberloafing Behaviors in Terms of Various Variables. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1), 72-82.
- Askew, K. L. (2012). The Relationship Between Cyberloafing and Task Performance and an Examination of the heory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Cyberloaing. Digital Commons University of South Florida, January, 1–74.
- Gökçearslan, Ş., Uluyol, Ç., & Şahin, S. (2018). Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support among university students: A path analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 91(May), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.036
- Henle, C. A., & Blanchard, A. L. (2008). The interaction of work stressors and organizational sanctions on cyberloafing. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(3), 383–400.
- Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
- Prasad, S., Lim, V. K., & Chen, D. J. (2010). Self-regulation, individual characteristics and cyberloafing.
- Taneja, A., Fiore, V., & Fischer, B. (2015). Cyber-slacking in the classroom: Potential for digital distraction in the new age. Computers and Education, 82, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.009
- Yılmaz, F. G. K., Yılmaz, R., Öztürk, H. T., Sezer, B., & Karademir, T. (2015). Cyberloafing as a barrier to the successful integration of information and communication technologies into teaching and learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 290-298.