Abstract :

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques are important for increasing oil production as to meet global energy demands. Surfactant flooding is a commonly used EOR method, but it has issues with surfactant molecules adhering on the surface of the reservoir rock more especially at higher salinity range. The study compares the effect of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) surfactant and Aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) nanoparticle hybrid at different salinity concentration ratios, stand-alone Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate surfactant and Aluminum oxide nanoparticle on viscosity, salinity ranges of 30,000ppm and 60,000ppm, permeability change and oil recovery. The efficiency of the formulated fluids was tested through flooding experiment using different twelve core samples of Niger – Delta sand formation. The results showed that the surfactant-nanoparticle hybrid solution enhanced the viscosity of fluids, gave better permeability change and higher oil recovery for both 30,000ppm and 60,000ppm salinity change examined. Concentration ratio of 0.1 wt%Al₂O₃ and 0.3wt% SDS gave the highest cumulative oil recovery of 82.61% using 30,000 ppm and 78.26% for 60,000ppm brine concentration at the same fluid concentration ratio brine followed by 0.2 wt%Al₂O₃/0.3wt%SDS concentration ratio. The hybrid with 0.1 wt%Al₂O₃ and 0.3wt% SDS concentration ratio gave lower permeability change of 52.30md than every other concentration investigated. The combination of Aluminum oxide nanoparticle and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate surfactant enhances surfactant properties as to improve displacement efficiency, reduce surfactant adsorption and permeability damage.

---

Keywords :

Aluminium oxide, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Nanoparticle, Salinity, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate

---

References :

1. Khan, A., Saxena, S., Baloni, S., Sharma, M. and Kodavaty, J. 2021. Overview and Methods in Enhanced Oil Recovery. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2070, 012061
2. Peng, B., Zhang, L., Luo, J., Wang, P., Ding, B., Zeng, M. and Cheng, Z. 2017. A Review of Nanomaterials for Nanofluid Enhanced Oil Recovery. RSC Adv, 7, 32246–32254
3. Gbadamosi, A.O., Junin, R., Manan, M.A., Agi, A. and Yusuff, A.S. 2019. An Overview of Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Recent Advances and Prospects. Int. Nano Lett., 9, 171–202.
4. Massarweh, O. and Abushaikha, A.S. 2020. The Use of Surfactants in Enhanced Oil Recovery: A Review of Recent Advances. Energy Rep., 6, 3150–3178.
5. Hendraningrat, L., and Torsaeter, O. 2014. Unlocking the Potential of Metal Oxides Nanoparticles to Enhance the Oil Recovery.
6. Mbachu, I. I. and Nweke, F. O. 2024. Effect of Silicon Oxide Nanoparticles in Xanthan Gum Solution Using Different Salinity for Enhanced Oli Recovery, Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 11(3), pp. 61-72.
7. Ogolo, N.A, Olafuyi O. A. and Onyekonwu, M.O. 2012. Enhanced oil recovery using Nanoparticles. SPE-160847.
8. Negin C., Ali S., and Xie Q. 2016. Application of nanotechnology for enhancing oil recovery – A review. Petroleum, 2: 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2016.10.002
9. Phoo, P. N. and Kreangkrai, M. 2023. Effect of Surfactant and Nanoparticles in Low Salinity Water on Interfacial Tension and Contact Angle, E3S Web of Conferences 422, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342204003
10. Vatanparast, H., Shahabi,. F. Bahramian, A., Javadi, A and R. Miller 2018. The Role of Electrostatic Repulsion on Increasing Surface Activity of Anionic Surfactants in the Presence of Hydrophilic Silica Nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. Vol. 8. p.1
11. Wu, Y., Chen, W., Dai, C., Huang, Y., Li, H., Zhao, M. and He, L. b., Jiao, B. 2017. Reducing Surfactant Adsorption on Rock by Silica Nanoparticles for Enhanced Oil Recovery. J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 153, 283–287
12. Adil, M., Lee, K., Zaid, H.M., Latiff, N.R.A. and Alnarabiji, M.S. 2018. Experimental Study on Electromagnetic-Assisted ZnO Nanofluid Flooding for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR). PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193518.
13. Tavakkoli, O., Kamyab, H., Junin, R., Ashokkumar, V., Shariati, A. and Mohamed, A.M. 2022. SDS–Aluminum Oxide Nanofluid for Enhanced Oil Recovery: IFT, Adsorption, and Oil Displacement Efficiency. ACS Omega, 7, 14022–14030
14. Deishad M, Najafadi N. F, Anderson, G. A, Pope G. A. and Sepehmoori, K. 2009. Modelling wettability alteration by surfactants in naturally fractured reservoirs. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 12:361
15. Sheng, J. (2013) Review of surfactant enhanced oil recovery in carbonate reservoirs. Adv Pet Explor Dev 6:1–10
16. Rosen, M. J and Kunjappu J.T. 2012. Surfactants and interfacial phenomena. Wiley, Hoboken
17. Pope, G. A. 2007. Overview of chemical EOR. Austin, Texas, USA
18. Negin, C., Ali, S. an d Xie, Q. 2017.  Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery, PETLM 117, Petroleum doi: 10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.007