Abstract :

Improving the digital literacy of educators and students is an important element in educational reform to support the achievement of students’ academic achievement. This study aims to identify alternative solutions through the development of Hypertext Preprocessor (PHP) application-based learning to improve students’ digital literacy. The study used a quasi-experimental method with a one-group pretest-posttest design involving 41 students of the Elementary School Teacher Education Study Program, Makassar Islamic University who were taking the Microteaching course. The study was conducted in eleven meetings, with digital literacy measurements using test instruments and questionnaires based on indicators compiled Referring to Caballé, Cervera, Esteve Mon (2020) and Wang Ng (2012). The results of the study showed a significant increase in digital literacy, with an average N Gain of 45% on the test results and 56% on the questionnaire. The implementation of PHP-based Lesson Study has also been shown to facilitate the implementation of the planning (plan), implementation (do), and reflection (see) stages, as measured by assessment instruments adapted from the UNY Lesson Study Team (2007) and Ibrohim (2009). With these results, the technology-based application shows its effectiveness in supporting the improvement of students’ digital literacy and can be implemented widely at various levels of education to improve the efficiency and quality of learning.

---

Keywords :

Digital Literacy, Hypertext Processor (PHP), Lesson Study

---

References :

1. M. Stehle and E. E. Peters-Burton, “Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1.
2. Ben-David Kolikant, “Adapting school to the twenty-first century: educators’ perspectives,” Technol. Pedagog. Educ., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 287–299, 2019, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2019.1584580.
3. Maine, Dialogue for Intercultural Understanding. 2021.
4. Z. Fahmi and M. J. S. Mendrofa, “Rural transformation and the development of information and communication technologies: Evidence from Indonesia,” Technol. Soc., vol. 75, no. June, p. 102349, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102349.
5. Sukendro et al., “Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 11, p. e05410, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.
6. Wardoyo, Y. D. Satrio, B. S. Narmaditya, and A. Wibowo, “Do technological knowledge and game-based learning promote students achievement: lesson from Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, p. e08467, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08467.
7. Nagel, G. B. Guðmundsdóttir, and H. W. Afdal, “Teacher educators’ professional agency in facilitating professional digital competence,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 132, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104238.
8. Lai and T. Jin, “Teacher professional identity and the nature of technology integration,” Comput. Educ., vol. 175, p. 104314, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104314.
9. Leibur, K. Saks, and I. A. Chounta, “Towards a conceptualized model of supporting teachers’ application process for acquiring professional qualifications,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 4, no. February, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100236.
10. Luo, “Construction of situational teaching mode in ideological and political classroom based on digital twin technology,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 101, p. 108104, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108104.
11. Godfrey, S. Seleznyov, J. Anders, N. Wollaston, and F. Barrera-Pedemonte, “A developmental evaluation approach to lesson study: exploring the impact of lesson study in London schools,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 325–340, 2019, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1474488.
12. Wolthuis, K. van Veen, S. de Vries, and M. D. Hubers, “Between lethal and local adaptation: Lesson study as an organizational routine,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 100, no. July 2019, p. 101534, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101534.
13. M. D. Kanellopoulou and M. Darra, “Benefits, difficulties and conditions of lesson study implementation in basic teacher education: A review,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 18–35, 2019, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p18.
14. D. Vermunt, M. Vrikki, P. Dudley, and P. Warwick, “Relations between teacher learning patterns, personal and contextual factors, and learning outcomes in the context of Lesson Study,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 133, no. July, p. 104295, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2023.104295.
15. Susilo, Lesson Study Berbasis Sekolah, Guru Konservatif Menuju Guru Inovatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2009.
16. Kager, J. P. Mynott, and M. Vock, “A conceptual model for teachers’ continuous professional development through lesson study: Capturing inputs, processes, and outcomes,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Open, vol. 5, no. February, p. 100272, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100272.
17. M. Elkomy and N. H. Elkhaial, “The lesson study approach to professional development: Promoting teachers’ peer mentoring and communities of practice and students’ learning in Egypt,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 109, p. 103538, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103538.
18. Gök and I. Sýlay, “The Effects of Problem Solving Strategies on Students’ Achievement, Attitude and Motivation,” Latin-American J. Phys. Educ., vol. 4, pp. 7–21, 2010, [Online]. Available: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3694877.
19. Kowitlawakul, M. F. Chan, S. S. L. Tan, A. S. K. Soong, and S. W. C. Chan, “Development of an e-Learning research module using multimedia instruction approach,” CIN – Comput. Informatics Nurs., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 158–166, 2017, doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000306.
20. Tagg and P. Seargeant, “Context design and critical language/media awareness: Implications for a social digital literacies education,” Linguist. Educ., 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100776.
21. Çetin, “Digital storytelling in teacher education and its effect on the digital literacy of pre-service teachers,” Think. Ski. Creat., vol. 39, p. 100760, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100760.
22. Moreno-Morilla, F. Guzmán-Simón, and E. García-Jiménez, “Digital and information literacy inside and outside Spanish primary education schools,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 28, p. 100455, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100455.
23. W. S. Merta, N. M. Ratminingsih, and I. G. Budasi, “The Integration of Technology in English Language Teaching to Stimulate Students’ Critical Thinking,” Lang. Circ. J. Lang. Lit., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 333–341, 2023, doi: 10.15294/lc.v17i2.39097.
24. Agasi, “Improving Critical Thinking by Using Technology in the Learning Process,” Interdiscip. J. Res. Dev., vol. 11, p. 76, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.56345/ijrdv11n1s112.
25. T. Becnel, “Effectiveness of simulation-based case studies on knowledge acquisition and clinical judgment in undergraduate nursing students,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 132, no. August 2023, p. 105994, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105994.
26. A. Puniatmaja, N. N. Parwati, I. M. Tegeh, and I. G. W. Sudatha, “The Effect of E-learning and Students’ Digital Literacy towards Their Learning Outcomes,” Pegem J. Educ. Instr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 348–356, 2023, doi: 10.47750/pegegog.14.01.39.
27. A. Ningrum, W. Widodo, and E. Sudibyo, “The Influence of Website-Based Learning Media on Science Learning Outcomes in Elementary School Students in the Era of Society 5.0,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12–28, 2024, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v5i1.445.
28. I. H. Rejeki, J. Sutarto, and B. N. Mindyarto, “The Effectiveness of Online Problem-Based Learning in Improving Critical Thinking Skills and Digital Literacy of Elementary School Students,” J. Prim. Educ., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 152–164, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe.