Abstract :

This study investigated senior high school science teachers’ attitudes, knowledge, and skills in alternative assessment within the Philippine context. A descriptive-quantitative research design was employed to gather data from 60 senior high school science teachers. The findings reveal that the teachers generally possess a high level of knowledge and skills in using alternative assessment methods. They hold positive attitudes towards alternative assessment, recognizing its benefits in improving student learning and assessment effectiveness. Some reservations exist, such as time consumption and difficulty in grading. The study also found no significant differences in teachers’ knowledge and attitudes based on current location in teaching, age, highest degree, and years of teaching experience. In contrast, teachers who received in-service training on alternative assessment demonstrated a significantly higher level of knowledge compared to those who did not. These findings highlight the potential of alternative assessment in senior high school science education. The need for ongoing professional development and support to enhance teachers’ knowledge and skills in effectively implementing these methods is crucial. To strengthen the positive attitudes and knowledge base identified in this study, it is recommended that senior high school science teachers be provided with professional development opportunities focused on alternative assessment methods. Additionally, resources and materials should be developed to support them in designing, implementing, and evaluating these assessments. By integrating alternative assessment practices into the curriculum and teacher training programs, we can ensure these effective methods become a mainstay in senior high school science education. Further research into the effectiveness of various alternative assessment methods would provide valuable insights for continual improvement.

---

Keywords :

In-Service Training, positive outlook, practices, Professional Development, science education

---

References :

1. Abrantes, L. & Bargamento, A. L. (2024). Lived Experiences of Out-of-Field Senior High School Teachers Teaching Physical Science. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 2(1), 117- 143. https://doi.org/10.17613/r5pt-t937.
2. Aliakbar et al., (2023). Iranian EFL Teachers’ Classroom Assessment Practices: Discrepancy between Theory and Practice. International Journal of Language Testing. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1407299.pdf
3. Al-Nouh et al., (2014). EFL Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes, Knowledge and Skills in Alternative Assessment. International Education Studies. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v7n5p68
4. Akintayo et al., (2024). A Review of Advanced Educational Methods And Their Impact On U.S. Competitiveness. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. DOI: 10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1064.
5. Agmanda, I., & Sumarmin, R. (2020). Teacher Understanding Towards Teachers’ Competency Standards in the Implementation of Science and Character Education of Junior High School Student in Pekanbaru. https://doi.org/10.2991/absr.k.200807.069
6. Atifnigar et al., (2020). Students’ Perception of Alternative Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation. DOI: 10.32996/ijllt.2020.3.4.22
7. Bacus, R. C., & Alda, R. C. (2022). Senior high school teaching: A phenomenological inquiry. Malaysian Journal of Learning & Instruction, 19(1), 242-276 https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.9
8. Barbarics M., (2019). Secondary school teachers’ lifelong learning of assessment: Autonomy in developing alternative assessment methods. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation 3(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.03.2019.06
9. Barrot J., (2021). K to 12 curriculum reform in the Philippines: towards making students future ready. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1973959
10. Biton, Y. & Halfon, E. (2024). Focus on the assessment concerns of in-service and preservice mathematics teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 12(1), 230-250. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.3040
11. Chang et al., (2020). A systematic review of trends and findings in research employing drawing assessment in science education. Studies in Science Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1735822
12. Co et al., (2021). Teaching Outside Specialization from the Perspective of Science Teachers. Open Access Library Journal, 8, 1-13. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1107725.
13. Davis E., & Gbormittah D., (2023). Senior High School Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions and Use of Continuous Assessment. Sage Journals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231188920
14. del Valle, J. L. (2021). A rough sail for learner-centred education as a global reform policy in the Philippines. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(1), 109–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1887330
15. Demir et al., (2019). Evaluation of Alternative Assessment Methods Used in Elementary Schools. Education and Science. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2019.6272
16. Gipila E. C., (2020). Assessing Teachers Using Philippine Standards for Teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(3): 739-746, 2020. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080302
17. Gunawan A., Tabroni I., Suspendi D., (2023). Online Learning: The Widespread Use of Google Forms as a Learning Media for Students in the Midst of the Covid-19 Pandemic; Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Science; Retrieved from: https://journal.formosapublisher.orh/index.php/esa/article/view/2822
18. Hung C., S., & Wu H. K., (2023). High school science teachers’ assessment literacy for inquiry-based science instruction. International Journal of Science Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2251657
19. Iskandarova, S., Fayziyeva, M., Asadova, G., Mursaidova, X., Sadivakasov, A., & Mustafoyeva, D. (2023). Factors development of teachers’ competence in improving the quality of education. Bio Web of Conferences/BIO Web of Conferences, 65, 10009. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20236510009
20. Kalykbayeva et al., (2022). The attitude of teachers toward students’ self-assessment of educational achievements in inclusive education lessons. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science. 17(2), 643-651.

https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i2.6859

21. Koocharoenpisal, N. (2023). Enhancing competency in designing learning activities based on stem education of teachers. Anatolian Journal of Educatio DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2023.8214a
22. Lam R., (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: Surveying knowledge, conceptions and practices of classroom-based writing assessment in Hong Kong. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.006
23. Leavy P., (2023). Research Designs. The Guilford Press. Retrieved from

https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=qUiKEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=quantitative+design&ots=RxKhJlIp6J&sig=9WHlBNyEsufVGuqLgPWHtA1FAug

24. Manigbas, J. P., & De Luna Y. V., (2023). Factors Influencing the Assessment Practices of Senior High School Teachers in Goa District, Philippines. Psych Educ. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10045830
25. Nilawati, Djulia, E., & Edi, S. (2019). Competency Analysis of Science / Biology Junior High School Teachers that Have Passed Certification in Aceh Tamiang Regency. Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/aisteel-19/125928359
26. Otto, A., & Estrada, J. L., (2019). Towards an Understanding of CLIL Assessment Practices in a European Context: Main Assessment Tools and the Role of Language in Content Subjects”. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2019, Vol. 2, Num. 1, pp. 31-42, Retrieved from https://raco.cat/index.php/clil/article/view/359606.
27. Putra N. S., & Agusnita, (2020). Scientific literacy competency of senior high school students based on question formats. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012161
28. Rahman et al., (2021). Implementing a formative assessment model at the secondary schools: attitudes and challenges. Language Testing in Asia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00136-3
29. Sarmiento et al., (2020). Assessment practices in Philippine higher STEAM education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol17/iss5/18/
30. Sotiriadou et al., (2019). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education 45(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582015
31. Tamban, V. E., & Maningas, O. B. (2020). Research Capability Of Public School Teachers: A Basis For Research Capability Enhancement Program. People. International Journal of Social Sciences, 6(01), 222–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2020.61.222235
32. Walls H., & Johnston M., (2023). Teachers’ beliefs and practices for the teaching of writing in the New Zealand elementary school: influences on student progress. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2023.2208145
33. Wetcho et al., (2022). K-12 teachers conducting remote teaching in Thailand during the pandemic: The strategies, challenges and future directions. Sage Journals. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103221113166
34. Xiangping, W., & Xiaodong, Z. (2022). The Professional Development Path of Senior High School English Teachers under the Background of Core Literacy. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 5(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25236/ajhss.2022.050703
35. Yuan, J., Jiang, Y., Zhang, S., & Hu, Y. (2021). What Is A Good Teacher For High School Students?A survey of high schools in Yangtze River Delta. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(11). DOI:  https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2021.041106