Abstract :

This study aims to discuss the involvement of local cultural factors in corporate governance. The involvement of local cultural factors results in two phenomena: (1) controlling the power of owners and (2) reduced independence of the board of commissioners and audit committee in monitoring CEO and board performance. Design/methodology/approach – This qualitative study employs in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with respondents from five private and state-owned enterprises. Interviews and discussions were conducted with CEOs, commissioners, audit committee members, and owners. Findings – The study reveals (1) owners exert significant controlling power over CEOs and boards, influencing strategic decisions and distorting professional performance. (2) Non-interventionist owners utilize the board of commissioners and audit committee for indirect control, reducing independence. (3) Controlling power of ownership is more dominant in private enterprises than state-owned enterprises, reflecting Indonesia’s local culture, where CEOs and boards are perceived as “staff” accountable to owners. (4) Lack of independence among commissioners and audit committees is more prevalent in private enterprises due to cultural influences.

---

Keywords :

Board of Commissioners, CEO, Committee Members., Corporate Governance

---

References :

1. Adams, S.M., A., Gupta dan J.D. Leeth, (2009). Are female executives over-represented in precarious leadership positions? British Journal of Management, 20 (1), pp. 1-12.
2. Agrawal, A. S., Schaefer dan T. Funke. (2018). Incorporating Industry 4.0 in corporate strategy. Analyzing the Impacts of Industry 4.0 in Modern Business Environments, pp. 161-176.
3. Andrikopoulos, A., A. Georgakopoulos, A. Merika dan A. Merikas. (2019). corporate governance in the shipping industry: board interlocks and agency conflicts. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19 (4), pp. 613-630.
4. Al-Shamsi, O. dan M. Ajmal, (2018). Critical factors for knowledge sharing in technology-intensive organizations: evidence from UAE service sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22 (2), pp. 384-412.
5. Bian, Y. dan L. Zhang, (2014). Corporate social capital in Chinese guanxi culture. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 40, pp. 421-443.
6. Cardon, P.W., Y. Huang dan G. Power. (2019). Leadership Communication on Internal Digital Platforms, Emotional Capital, and Corporate Performance: The Case for Leader-Centric Listening. International Journal of Business Communication.
7. Calantone, R.J., S.K. Vickery dan C. Dröge, (1995). Business Performance and Strategic New Product Development Activities: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12 (3), pp. 214-223.
8. Cornfeld, L. (2017). Expo afterlife: corporate performance and capitalist futurity in the Carousel of Progress. Women and Performance, 27 (3), pp. 316-333.
9. Cutting, B. dan A. Kouzmin, (2000). The emerging patterns of power in corporate governance – Back to the future in improving corporate decision making. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15 (5), pp. 477-507.
10. Cho, J., T., Kwon dan J. Ahn, (2010). Half success, half failure in Korean Affirmative Action: An empirical evaluation on corporate progress. Women’s Studies International Forum, 33 (3), pp. 264-273.
11. Daily, C.M. dan D.R. Dalton, (1992). The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 7 (5), pp. 375-386.
12. Damayanti, K.and Setyawardani, L. (2019), “Alliance cooperation joint ATM network: exploring the banking sector in Indonesia,” Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 342-351.
13. Einwiller, S.A. dan M. Boenigk. (2012). Examining the link between integrated communication management and communication effectiveness in medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Marketing Communications, 18 (5), pp. 335-361.
14. Elsayed, K. (2011). Board size and corporate performance: The missing role of board leadership structure. Journal of Management and Governance, 15 (3), pp. 415-446.
15. Flynn, F.J. dan B.M. Staw. (2004). lend me your wallets: The effect of charismatic leadership on external support for an organization. Strategic Management Journal, 25 (4), pp. 309-330.
16. Guan, F. (2013). An empirical study on relations among human resource systems, leadership patterns, and organization performance. Information Technology Journal, 12 (22), pp. 6954-6960.
17. Hassanain, M. (2017). An overview of the performance improvement initiatives by the Ministry of health in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Inquiry (United States),
18. Herrera, M.E.B. (2016). Innovation for impact: Business innovation for inclusive growth. Journal of Business Research, 69 (5), pp. 1725-1730.
19. Huang, M., P. Li, F. Meschke dan J. P. Guthrie, (2015). Family firms, employee satisfaction, and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 34, pp. 108-127.
20. Jabeen, F. dan M. Behery, (2017). Exploring the status and effects of balanced scorecard adoption in the non-western context: Evidence from the Middle East. Journal of Management Development, 36 (8), pp. 1063-1075.
21. Jensen, M.C dan W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 305-360.
22. Jun, W. dan C. Rowley (2014). Change and continuity in management systems and corporate performance: Human resource management, corporate culture, risk management and corporate strategy in South Korea. Business History, 56 (3), pp. 485-508.
23. Kwarteng, A. dan F. Aveh. (2018). Empirical examination of organizational culture on accounting information system and corporate performance: Evidence from a developing country perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26 (4), pp. 675-698.
24. Leszczyńska, M. (2018). Mandatory Quotas for Women on Boards of Directors in the European Union: Harmful to or Good for Company Performance? European Business Organization Law Review, 19 (1), pp. 35-61.
25. Mabey, C. (2013). Leadership development in organizations: Multiple discourses and diverse practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15 (4), pp. 359-380.
26. O’Hagan, S.B. (2017). An exploration of gender, interlocking directorates, and corporate performance. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9 (3), pp. 269-282. -Q2
27. O’Regan, N. dan U. Lehmann. (2008). the impact of strategy, leadership and culture on organisational performance: A case study of an SME. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 2 (4), pp. 303-322.
28. —————A. Ghobadian. (2010). A serial successful strategic transformer of businesses: An interview with Anthony Habgood, Chairman of Whitbread plc, Reed Elsevier plc and former CEO and Chairman, Bunzl plc. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3 (1), pp. 72-78.
29. Othman, H.B. (2011). The effect of board structure and process disclosure on corporate performance in the emerging African markets. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27 (2), pp. 156-174.
30. Oyewobi, L.O., A.O. Windapo dan R.O. Bamidele James. (2015). an empirical analysis of construction organisations’ competitive strategies and performance. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5 (4), pp. 417-431.
31. Pillemer, J., E. R. Graham dan D. M. Burke. (2014). the face says it all: CEOs, gender, and predicting corporate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 25 (5), pp. 855-864.
32. Pirade, A. E., H. Siregar, E. Eriyatno dan S. Djohar. (2018). the influence of leadership and corporate behavior on corporate capability and performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9 (9), pp. 1849-1868.
33. Samuelson, B.A., C.S. Galbraith dan J.W. Mcguire, (1985). Organizational Performance and Top-Management Turnover. Organization Studies, 6 (3), pp. 275-291.
34. Salin, A.S.A.P., Z. Ismail, M. Smith, A. Nawawi. (2019). Board ethical commitment and corporate performance: Malaysian evidence. Journal of Financial Crime, 26 (4), pp. 1146-1164.
35. Silitonga, P.E.S. (2017). Company performance model: Corporate cultural analysis and company development of motivation work. Man in India, 97 (24), pp. 249-271.
36. Shehata, G.M. (2015). Leveraging organizational performance via knowledge management systems platforms in emerging economies: Evidence from the Egyptian information and communication technology (ICT) industry. VINE, 45 (2), pp. 239-278.
37. Shahzad, F., M. Hussain Baig, I.U. Rehman, F. Latif dan B.S. Sergi, (2019). What drives the impact of women directors on firm performance? Evidence from intellectual capital efficiency of US listed firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital.
38. Thanetsunthorn, N. dan R. Wuthisatian, (2016). Current state of corporate governance: global business and cultural analysis. Management Research Review, 39 (11), pp. 1431-1446.
39. Tseng, S.M. (2010). The correlation between organizational culture and knowledge conversion on corporate performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (2), pp. 269-284.
40. Uribe-Bohorquez, M.V., J. Martínez-Ferrero, I.-M. dan García-Sánchez. (2019). Women on boards and efficiency in a business-orientated environment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26 (1), pp. 82-96.
41. Van Reine, P.P. dan B. Dankbaar, (2011). A Virtuous Circle? Co-evolution of Regional and Corporate Cultures. European Planning Studies, 19 (11), pp. 1865-1883.
42. Wilderom, C.P.M., P.T. Van den Berg dan U.J. Wiersma. (2012). A longitudinal study of the effects of charismatic leadership and organizational culture on objective and perceived corporate performance. Leadership Quarterly, 23 (5), pp. 835-848.
43. Xu, K. (2011). Causal attributions for corporate performance: A cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and U.S. American companies. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 4 (3), pp. 221-239.
44. A. (2008). Corporate Governance and Agency Conflict. Journal of Accounting Research, 46 (5), pp. 1143-1181
45. E. F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88 (2), pp. 288-307.
46. Lozano, M.B., Beatrizmartínez dan J. Pindado. (2016). Corporate Governance, Ownership and firm Value: Drivers of Ownership as a Good Corporate Governance Mechanism International Business Review 25, pp. 1333–1343
47. Beck, M. J dan E. G. Mauldin. (2014). Who’s Really In Charge? Audit Committee versus CFO Power and Audit Fees. The Accounting Review 89 (6) pp. 2057–2085.
48. Villalonga, B. dan R. Amit. (2006). How Do Family Ownership, Control and Management Affect firm Value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, pp. 385–417.