Abstract :

Child and youth care students (CYC) perceive the transition from first- to second-year practicum as stressful and challenging and occasionally view themselves as not ready. Located within the constructivist–interpretive research paradigm, the aim of this qualitative course-based study was to gain greater insight into the transition process of CYC students from first- to second-year practicums with a focus on their adaptive capacities. A triangulation data collection method was used, comprised of conversational style, semi-structured interviews, a focus group, and art-based activity. Three main themes were extracted from the data analysis: (a) leaning into uncertainty, (b) being real, and (c) tapping into support systems.

---

Keywords :

Adaptive capacity, Child and youth care, course-based, Qualitative

---

References :

1. Adil, M., Nagu, N., Rustam, A., Wahyuni, Idrawahyuni, & Winarsih, E. (2022). Interpretive paradigm on development of science and accounting research. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 1(4) 297-302.
2. Allyn, D. A. (2013). Course-based undergraduate research: It can be accomplished! Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 84(9), 32–36.
3. Anderson, J.E., Ross, A.J., Macrae, C., & Wiig, S. (2020). Defining adaptive capacity in healthcare: A new framework for researching resilient performance. Applied Ergonomics, 87, 103111.
4. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Bellefeuille, G., Ekdhal, C., Kent, L. & Kluczny, M. (2014). A course-based creative inquiry approach to teaching introductory research methods in child and youth care undergraduate education. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 2(2), 1-9.
6. Bellefeuille, G., Heaney-Dalton, K., & Stiller, R. (2024). Relational-centered arts-based teaching and learning: Engaging body, mind, & soul. A primer for child and youth care educators. CYC-Net Press.
7. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(4),589–597.
8. Breen, L. (2006). A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(3), 463–475.
9. Brinkmann, S. (2012). Conversations. In qualitative inquiry in everyday life: Working with everyday life materials (pp. 83-107). SAGE Publications Ltd.
10. Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality and Quantity, 56, 1391–1412.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications Ltd.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology. Chicago, Aldine.
15. Duygu Bedir, S. (2015). Art-based educational research to generate a practice based approach. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Art Education Special Issue.
16. Fewster, G. (1990). Being in child care: A journey into self. New York: Haworth.
17. Flick, U. (1992). Triangulation revisited: Strategy of validation or alternative? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 175-9.
18. Freeman, J,. & Garfat, T. (2014). Being, interpreting, doing: A framework for organizing the characteristics of a relational child and youth care approach. CYC Online, 179, 23-27.
19. Gharabaghi, K. (2014). Relationships and relational practice. CYC-Online, 185, 6-9.
20. Gill, , & Baillie, J. (2018). Interviews and focus groups in qualitative research: An update for the digital age. British Dental Journal, 225(7), 668–672.
21. Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K., & Lopatto, D. (2010). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: Changes in career choices and attitude. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10(3), 279–86.
22. Hunt, M. R., Mehta, A., & Chan, L. S. (2009). Learning to think qualitatively: Experiences of graduate students conducting qualitative health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 129-135.
23. Krueger, R.A, & Casey, M.A. (2000) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25. McNiff, S. (2007). Arts-based research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 29–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: AltaMira Press.
26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
27. Pulla, V., & Carter, E.V. (2018). Employing interpretivism in social work research. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice, 6, 9-14.
28. Schober, M. F., &Frederick G. C. (1997). Does conversational interviewing reduce survey measurement error? Public Opinion Quarterly 61, 576-602.