Abstract :

The T-shaped curriculum in secondary technical VET represents a progressive educational framework designed to equip students with both specialized technical skills and a broad range of transferable competencies. This curriculum model emphasizes the development of deep expertise in specific technical fields, such as engineering or computer science, while simultaneously fostering essential skills in communication, critical thinking, and collaboration. By integrating real-world applications, experiential learning opportunities, and interdisciplinary projects, the T-shaped curriculum prepares students for immediate employment and long-term adaptability in a rapidly evolving job market. This approach not only enhances students’ technical proficiency but also cultivates their ability to navigate complex professional environments, thereby addressing the growing demand for versatile and resourceful graduates. The implementation of the T-shaped curriculum in secondary technical VET programs is shown to align educational outcomes with industry needs, decisively producing well-rounded professionals capable of contributing productively to diverse roles and industries. This article explores the significance of the T-shaped curriculum in shaping future-ready individuals and highlights its potential to transform TVET in response to the challenges of the modern workforce.

---

Keywords :

Curriculum, T-shaped model, transferability, TVET.

---

References :

1. Babatope A, A., Samuel, T.M., Ajewole, P.I., & Anyanwu, O.M. (2020). Competence-driven engineering education: A case for T-shaped engineers and teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9, 32-38. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V9I1.20274
2. Cannon, J A., & Arnold, M J. (1998, March 1). Student Expectations of Collegiate Internship Programs in Business: A 10-Year Update. Taylor & Francis, 73(4), 202-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832329809601630
3. Cheng, J., R. Huang, Q. Jin, J. Ma and Y. Pan. (2018). An Undergraduate Curriculum Model for Intelligence Science and Technology, IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced & Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing & Communications, Cloud & Big Data Computing, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation (SmartWorld/SCALCOM/UIC/ATC/CBDCom/IOP/SCI), Guangzhou, China, 2018, pp. 234-239. https://doi.org/10.1109/smartworld.2018.00075

4. Hillon, M E., Cai-Hillon, Y., & Brammer, D. (2012). A Brief Guide to Student Projects with Industry. Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 13(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.1120.0092
5. Johnson-Eilola, J., & Selber, S A. (2001). Sketching a Framework for Graduate Education in Technical Communication. Routledge, 10(4), 403-437. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1004_3
6. Charles J. L., (2009). Building a framework for the senior capstone experience in an information computer technology program. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on SIG-information technology education (SIGITE ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1145/1631728.1631804
7. Merritt, S M., Stix, A., Sullivan, J E., Grossman, F., Tappert, C C., & Sachs, D. (2004). Developing a professional doctorate in computing. Association for Computing Machinery, 36(4), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1041624.1041654
8. Ninan, J., Hertogh, M., & Liu, Y. (2022). Educating engineers of the future: T-shaped professionals for managing infrastructure projects. Project Leadership and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100071
9. Paclejan, R P. (2023). Level of Job Stress, Coping Strategies and Teaching Performance of Iloilo State College of Fisheries-San Enrique Campus Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2023/3/3848.pdf
10. Pinto, S.I., & Zvacek, S.M. (2020). Cognitive apprenticeship and T-shaped instructional design in computational fluid mechanics: Student perspectives on learning. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 50, 51 – 77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419020915725
11. Purwaningrum, D., Suhaeni, S., Pramesti, R M., Agustina, A R., Juwita, R., Hanum, Z., Putri, S., Udin, N., Hartono, H., Prakoso, E P., Udiono, T., & Suranto, D. (2022, December 27). DIGITAL READING DURING THE PANDEMIC: EXPLORING VOCATIONAL STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS., 6(2), 353-364. https://doi.org/10.30743/ll.v6i2.6013
12. Rippa, P., Landi, G., Cosimato, S., Turriziani, L., & Gheith, M.H. (2020). Embedding entrepreneurship in doctoral students: the impact of a T-shaped educational approach. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-07-2020-0289
13. Ruf, S., & Carter, M. (2009, October 1). Communication learning outcomes from software engineering professionals: A basis for teaching communication in the engineering curriculum. 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2009, pp. 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2009.5350442
14. Zhang, Y., Chang, X., Yue, C., & Li, L. (2023). Exploration and practice of teaching methods of basic specialized courses for postgraduate majors based on the characteristics of “Three Teaching Processes”. EDP Sciences, 174, 01031-01031. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317401031