Abstract :

This study examines the optimization strategy of property development plan changes for Bumi Cipta 3 Jakarta, a project by PT Cipta Bangun Property, one of the largest property companies in Indonesia. The analysis uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. The project is motivated by significant post-pandemic shifts in office space demand within Jakarta’s Central Business District. The study identifies four alternative development options: continuing with the office tower plan, or pivoting to an apartment, data center, or hospital. By interviewing key decision-makers and using the AHP method, the research evaluates financial and non-financial criteria, such as market attractiveness and site analysis. The findings suggest that the hospital alternative offers the highest potential in both financial returns and market alignment, followed by the data center and apartment projects. Strategic recommendations are provided to prioritize the hospital project while keeping the other alternatives in consideration for phased development, thus ensuring flexibility in response to future market conditions.

---

Keywords :

AHP, Indonesian Property., Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Post-Pandemic Office Project in Jakarta, Property Development

---

References :

1. McKinsey Global Institute Report, July 13, 2023. “Global Economics Intelligence executive summary”
2. John Lang LaSalle in 1Q 2023 Jakarta Property Market Update (2023). “Seizing Opportunities on the Path to Recovery”
3. Velasquez, M., & Hester, P.T. (2013). “An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods.” International Journal of Operations Research, 10(2), 56-66.
4. Saaty, T. L. (1980). Analytic hierarchy process. planning, priority setting, resource allocation. McGraw-Hill.
5. Yang, J. & Shi, P. (2002). Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process in Firm’s Overall Performance Evaluation: A Case Study in China. International Journal of Business, 7(3), 234-246.
6. Mantogiannis, V. A., & Katsigiannis, F. A. (2020). Assessing Real Estate Investment Alternatives: A multi-criteria and multi-stakeholder decision aid tool. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i1.702
7. Ronyastra, I. M., Gunarta, I. K., & Ciptomulyono, U. (2015). A multi criteria decision analysis for Reinvestment Action Portfolio selection problem in an Indonesian real estate company. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.076
8. Guarini, M., Battisti, F., & Chiovitti, A. (2018). A methodology for the selection of multi-criteria decision analysis methods in real estate and Land Management Processes. Sustainability, 10(2), 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020507
9. Taleai, M., Mansourian, A., (2008). “Using Delphi-AHP and Information Entropy for Prioritizing Planning Issues in Urban Planning.” Cities, 25(1), 1-19.
10. Ginevičius, R., & Zubrecovas, V. (2009). Selection of the optimal real estate investment project basing on multiple criteria evaluation using stochastic dimensions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2009.10.261-270
11. Geltner, D. M., Miller, N. G., Clayton, J., & Eichholtz, P. (2014). Commercial real estate analysis and investments: Analysis and Investments. Delmar Cengage Learning.
12. Brunelli, M. (2015). Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process. SpringerBriefs in Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12502-2
13. Goepel, Klaus D. (2013). Implementing the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Standard Method for Multi-Criteria Decision Making In Corporate Enterprises – A New AHP Excel Template with Multiple Inputs, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2013, p 1 -10
14. Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute, Inc. pp. 33-35; pp. 11, 41; pp. 42-44