Abstract :

This study explores the effects of theatrical integration on student engagement, creativity, and critical thinking in STEM teaching in poor schools. There are still gaps in research and real-world application of multidisciplinary education, especially in developing nations, despite its increasing prominence. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study assesses the efficacy of integrated STEM and theatrical workshops by means of teacher surveys and classroom observations. Results show that these seminars greatly increase students’ interest in STEM fields and develop critical abilities like communication and collaboration. The partnership between educators and community partners emphasizes the necessity of designing curricula that are flexible and meet the requirements of a wide range of students. With the goal of addressing educational disparities and enhancing learning outcomes for marginalized kids, policymakers and educators can benefit from the insights provided by this study, which adds to the body of knowledge on creative pedagogical approaches.

---

Keywords :

Drama pedagogy, Interdisciplinary learning, Psychology, STEM education, Underprivileged students.

---

References :

1. Aslam, S., Alghamdi, A., Abid, N., & Kumar, T. (2023). Challenges in implementing STEM education: Insights from novice STEM teachers in developing countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14455.
2. Bardoe, D., Hayford, D., Bio, R. B., & Gyabeng, J. (2023). Challenges to the implementation of STEM education in the Bono East Region of Ghana. Heliyon, 9(10), e20416.
3. Ashton-Hay, S. (2005). Drama: Engaging all learning styles. In Proceedings of the 9th International INGED (Turkish English Education Association) Conference . Economics and Technology University, Ankara, Turkey.
4. Celume, M.-P., Besançon, M., & Zenasni, F. (2019). Fostering children and adolescents’ creative thinking in education: Theoretical model of drama pedagogy training. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 2611.
5. Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 6.
6. United Nations. THE 17 GOALS|Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals.
7. Hallinger, P.; Chatpinyakoop, C. A Bibliometric Review of Research on Higher Education for Sustainable Development, 1998–2018. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2401.
8. Aleixo, A.M.; Leal, S.; Azeiteiro, U.M. Higher Education Students’ Perceptions of Sustainable Development in Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 327, 129429.
9. Nousheen, A.; Zai, S.A.Y.; Waseem, M.; Khan, S.A. Education for Sustainable Development (ESD): Effects of Sustainability Education on Pre-Service Teachers’ Attitude towards Sustainable Development (SD). J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119537.
10. Department of Education Australia. What Is STEM? Available online: https://www.education.wa.edu.au/what-is-stem.

11. Dierking, L.D.; Falk, J.H. 2020 Vision: Envisioning a New Generation of STEM Learning Research. Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 2016, 11, 1–10.
12. Guo, J.; Woulfin, S. Twenty-First Century Creativity: An Investigation of How the Partnership for 21st Century Instructional Framework Reflects the Principles of Creativity. Roeper Rev. 2016, 38, 153–161.
13. El-Sabagh, H.A. Adaptive E-Learning Environment Based on Learning Styles and Its Impact on Development Students’ Engagement. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2021, 18, 53.
14. Krell, M.; Koska, J.; Penning, F.; Krüger, D. Fostering Pre-Service Teachers’ Views about Nature of Science: Evaluation of a New STEM Curriculum. Res. Sci. Technol.Educ. 2015, 33, 344–365.
15. Lam, T.; Toan, T.; Ngoc, H. Challenges to STEM Education in Vietnamese High School Contexts. Heliyon 2021, 7, E08649.
16. Pearson, G. National Academies Piece on Integrated STEM. J. Educ. Res. 2017, 110, 224–226.
17. Ferrari, P. Trends in Learning|STEAM, STREAM, STEM Acronym; cApStAn: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020.
18. Li, Y. Journal for STEM Education Research–Promoting the Development of Interdisciplinary Research in STEM Education. J. STEM Educ. Res. 2018, 1, 1–6.
19. Leung, A. Boundary Crossing Pedagogy in STEM Education. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2020, 7, 15.
20. National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and National Research Council (NRC) National Academies Press; Washington, D.C.: 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. – DOI
21. Agyemang A., et al. Feb. 2022. Towards an Inclusive Stem Education in Kwame.
22. Aggarwal S. What is STEM education and why is it important for kids? KidPillar. 2020 https://kidpillar.com/what-is-stem-education-and-why-is-it-important-for… May 27.
23. Siregar N.C., Rosli R., Maat S.M., Capraro M.M. The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) program on students’ achievement in mathematics: a meta-analysis. Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ. Aug. 2019;1(1) doi: 10.29333/iejme/5885. – DOI
24. Di Pietro, R.J. 1987. Strategic Interaction: Learning Languages through Scenarios. Cambridge: CUP.
25. Donato, R. and D. McCormick. 1994. ‘A socio-cultural perspective on language learning strategies: the role of mediation’. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), pp. 453-464.
26. Groundwater-Smith, S. 2004. Transforming learning: transforming places and spaces for learning. Curriculum Matters, 3(3),13-17.
27. Kinsella, K. 1996. Designing group work that supports and enhances diverse classroom work styles. TESOL Journal, 6(1), pp. 24-31.
28. Aden, J. (2014). Empathie et pratiques théâtrales en didactique des langues. E-CRINI 6, 1–8. Google Scholar
29. Amato, A., Ziegler, E., and Emans, R. (1973). The effectiveness of creative dramatics and storytelling in a library setting. J. Educ. Res. 67, 161–162. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1973.10884592 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar
30. Baker, B. R. (1996). Drama and Young Children. Waco, TX: School of Education, Baylor University.
31. Barba, E. (1979). The Floating Islands, ed. F. Taviani (Holstebro: Thomsens Bogtrykkeri). Google Scholar