Abstract :
Understanding teacher identity highlights a significance in language education since how teachers define who they are and their roles in a current context influence their pedagogical growth, teaching approaches, and interaction with students and colleagues [1], therefore, supporting effective teaching and learning outcomes [2]. Considering teacher identity as an unfixed quality that gradually changes depending on contextual shifts, it is crucial to investigate the reconstruction of teacher identity as a result of integrating technology into teaching. Despite the necessity, this area remains under-investigated in Vietnam, particularly among EFL language teachers. This qualitative research, therefore, aims to examine the reconstruction of Vietnamese ELF teacher identity as they adapted the requirement of technological application in their teaching practices. This research employs narrative inquiry and the hermeneutic circle to explore these experiences. The finding indicates that those teachers engaged with the complex interplay between their inside and the outside, resulting in distinct identities as two main groups: technological-learners who teach and technological-interested teachers. The study went deep into the influence of personal beliefs, institutional policies, and pressure from peers and students on these identities.
Keywords :
EFL Teacher, Teacher Identity, Technological IntegrationReferences :
- Kayi-Aydar,(2019). Languageteacheridentity.Language Teaching, 52(3), 281-295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000223
- Miller, J. (2009). Teacher Identity. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 172-181). Cambridge University Press.
- Dang, N. T. (2011). Exploring CALL Options for Teaching EFL in Vietnam [Master’s thesis, Minnesota State University]. Cornerstone.
- Gruba, P., & Nguyen, N. B. C. (2019). Evaluating technology integration in a Vietnamese university language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5-6), 619-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527365
- Nguyen, T. H. N. (2019). Teachers’ implementation of computer-assisted language learning in the context of educational change in Vietnam. In C. V. Le, H. T. M. Nguyen, M. T. T. Nguyen, & R. Barnard (Eds.), Building Teacher Capacity in English Language Teaching in Vietnam (pp. 133-149). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429457371
- Day, R. R. (1991). Models and the Knowledge Base of Second Language Teacher Education.
- Lortie, D. C. 1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
- Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D.j. (1999) Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In Sikula, J.(Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education, (pp. 102 – 119). New York:Macmillan Library References USA & Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
- Bailey, K. M. (1996). The best laid plans: Teachers’ in-class decisions to depart from their lesson
In Bailey, K. M., Nunan, D. (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education, (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Atay, D., Ece, A. (2009). Multiple identities as reflected in English-language education: The Turkish perspective. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, vol. 8, pp. 21-34.
- Day, C., Kington, A. (2008). Identity, well-being and effectiveness: The emotionalcontexts of teaching. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, vol. 16, 1, pp. 7-23.
- Smith, R. G. (2007). Developing professional identities and knowledge: Becoming primaryTeachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 13, n. 4, pp. 377-397.
- Brown, J. J. (2006). The teacher-self: The role of identity in teaching. UnpublishedPhD Dissertation. University of Massachusetts Lowell.
- Coldron, J., Smith, R. (1999). Active location in teachers’ construction of theirprofessional identities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 31, 6, pp. 711-726.
- Wenger E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY Cambridge University Press.
- Olsen, B. (2008). Introducing teacher identity and this volume. Teacher Education Quarterly, vol. 35, 3, pp. 3-6.
- Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professionalidentity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 16, 749-764.
- Pennington, M. C., & Richards, J. C. (2016). Teacher Identity in Language Teaching: Integrating Personal, Contextual, and Professional Factors. RELC Journal, 47(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631219
- Cameron, D., & Grant, A. (2017). The role of mentoring in early career physics teachers’ professional identity construction. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 6(2), 128–142. doi:10.1108/ijmce-01-2017-0003.
- Clandinin, J., D., Connelly, M. F. (1999). Chapter fourteen: Teacher as curriculum maker. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (pp. 363 – 401). London: Open Books.
- Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: CUP.
- Woods, D. (2006). Who does what in the ‘management of language learning’? Planning and thesocial construction of the ‘motivation to notice’. In Gieve, S., I. Miller. (Eds.),Understanding the language classroom, (pp. 88-113). London: Palgrave Macmillan
- Tatto, M. T. (1998). The influence of teacher education on teachers’ beliefs about purposes ofeducation, roles, and practice. Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 49, 1, pp. 66 – 77
- Tedick, D. J. (Ed.) (2005). Second language teacher education: International perspectives.Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kitchen, J. (2005a). Looking backward, moving forward: Understanding my narrativeas a teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 17-30.
- Kitchen, J. (2005b). Conveying respect and empathy: Becoming a relational teacherStudying Teacher Education, vol. 1, n. 2, pp. 195–207.
- Korthagen, F. A. J., Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a meansto enhance professional development. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, vol. 11, 1, pp. 47-71.
- Richards, J. C. (1991). Reflective teaching in TESOL teacher education. In Sadtono, E.(Ed.), Issues in language teacher education, (pp. 1-19). Singapore: SEAMEO RegionalLanguage Centre.
- Poynor, L. (2005). A conscious and deliberate intervention: The influence of languageteacher education. In Tedick, D. J. (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives, (pp. 157-175). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Freeman, D. (2004). Language, sociocultural theory, and L2 teacher education:Examining the technology of subject matter and the architecture of instruction. Flores, M.A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.
- O’Connor, K. E. (2008). “You choose to care”: Teachers, emotions and professionalTeaching and Teacher Education, vol. 24, pp. 117–126.
- Zembylas, M. (2005). Teaching with emotion: A postmodern enactment. Greenwich,Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
- McNaughton, S. M., & Billot, J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(6), 644-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2016.1163669 Lockee, B. B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics, 4(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0
- Altrichter, H. (2001). Schools, Micropolitics of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 13594-13598). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02455-4 Jonker, H., März, V., & Voogt, J. (2018). Teacher educators’ professional identity under construction: The transition from teaching face-to-face to a blended curriculum.
- Bowman, M. A., Vongkulluksn, V. W., Jiang, Z., & Xie, K. (2020). Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1830895
- Lai, , & Jin, T. (2021). Teacher professional identity and the nature of technology integration. Computers & Education, 175, 104314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104314
- Njiku, J., Maniraho, J. F., & Mutarutinya, V. (2019). Understanding teachers’ attitude towards computer technology integration in education: A review of literature. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3041-3052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019- 09917-z
- Abbott, C. (2016). Embracing Digital Technologies in Classroom Practice: The Impact of Teacher Identity. Australian Educational Computing, 31(2), 1-26. http://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/93
- Hsieh, B. (2010). Exploring the Complexity of Teacher Professional Identity [Doctoral thesis, University of California, Berkeley]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9406p4sb
- Josselson, R. (2010). Narrative Research. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n259
- Zembylas, M., & Chubbuck, S. M. (2014). The Intersection of Identity, Beliefs, and Politics in Conceptualizing “Teacher Identity”. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Teachers’ Beliefs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108437
- Kitade, (2015). Second Language Teacher Development through CALL Practice: The Emergence of Teachers’ Agency. CALICO Journal, 32(2), 396–425. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v32i3.26637
- Donaghue, H. (2003). An instrument to elicit teacher’s beliefs and assumptions. ELT Journals, 57(4), 344-351.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
- Howard, S. K. & Maton, K. (2011). Theorising knowledge practices: a missing piece of the educational technology puzzle. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 3, 191–206.