Abstract :

Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is a behavior change approach that aims at promoting access to safe sanitation and hygiene. The approach empower communities to take collective action to eliminate open defecation practices, thus promoting a healthy population. Despite CLTS implementation in Kenya, open defecation is still rampant, in low-income communities particularly in pastoral areas. This study’s study was to examine the influence of social and cultural factors on adoption of Community-Led Total Sanitation in pastoral areas. The study was conducted in Laisamis Sub-County, Marsabit County, Kenya using a descriptive design with a mixed methods approach. The sample size was 393 household heads who were randomly selected from the five Wards in the Sub-County, which were treated as clusters. The data was collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed in descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data was collected from a focus group and analyzed in themes. Findings showed that despite CLTS activities to impart communities with knowledge on toilet use, 63.3% of participants opined that open defecation practice was still rampant. The most cases of open defecation were reported among herdsmen whose livelihood was based in herding in grazelands where there were no toilets. Results also revealed that taboos and beliefs that surrounded toilet sharing between children and adults affected toilet utilization (OR 0.67 95% CI: 0.345-4.567, P=0.002). The impact of CLTS was thought to be minimal for a community that often interacted with animal faeces, which made over 90% of the participants believe that human faecal matter was not dangerous just like animal faecal matter. The role of women in household sanitation matters was appreciated as they were left in households to construct toilets while men went to look after cattle. However, herdsmen’s concerns regarding the essence of investing in improved latrines were minimal as most of their time was spent in the fields, and convincing them on the need for better toilets could have been impossible for the women. The study concluded that CLTS was an effective strategy in triggering behaviour change among communities if its execution was to be context-specific. Involvement of both women and men in CLTS triggering exercises is essential in reinforcing the importance of ending open defecation whether in bushes or at home.

---

Keywords :

Community-Led total sanitation, Cultural factors, latrine construction, latrine use, open defecation, pastoral communities, Social factors.

---

References :

1. Abdulai, M. (2011). Causes and effects of indiscriminate waste disposal: The case of Tema metropolis (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast).
2. Abebe, T. A., & Tucho, G. T. (2020). Open defecation-free slippage and its associated factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review. Systematic reviews, 9, 1-15.
3. Abramovsky, L., Augsburg, B., Flynn, E., & Oteiza, F. (2016). Improving CLTS Targeting: Evidence from Nigeria. Institute for Fiscal Studies Briefing Note BN, 183.
4. Adam , A.M. (2021). A study on sample size determination in survey research. New ideas concerning science and technology (4) 125-134
5. Ahmed, M., Hoque, M. A., Sarkar, M. S. K. A., Chowdhury, M. A. I., & Begum, A. (2014). Socio- cultural evaluation of sanitation hygiene in Sylhet city of Bangladesh. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1(3).
6. Ahmmed, H. M., & Mohammed, S. S. (2011). The Health Impact of Improving Environmental Sanitation through Community Involvement in Karrari Locality, Khartoum State. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(4), 1735–1741. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19–0911
7. Amoah, I. D., Adegoke, A. A., & Stenström, T. A. (2018). Soil‐ transmitted helminth infections associated with wastewater and sludge reuse: a review of current evidence. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 23(7), 692-703.
8. (2009). Mid-Term Evaluation Report; Magadi Integrated Health Project; Maternal, New Born and Child health ―Boma Delivery Model‖,
9. (2010). End Term Evaluation of The Maternal Newborn and Child Health (Mnch) Boma Delivery Model- Magadi Ward, AMREF, Nairobi.
10. Appiah-Effah, E., Boakye, K., Salihu, T., Duku, G. A., Fenteng, J. O. D., Boateng, G., … & Nyarko, K. B. (2024). Determinants of Open Defecation Among Rural Women in Ghana: Analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys. Environmental Health Insights, 18, 11786302241226774.
11. Ashraf, S., Kuang, J., Das, U., Shpenev, A., Thulin, E., & Bicchieri, C. (2022). Social beliefs and women’s role in sanitation decision making in Bihar, India: An exploratory mixed method study. Plos one, 17(1), e0262643.
12. Asnake, D., & Adane, M. (2020). Household latrine utilization and associated factors in semi-urban areas of northeastern Ethiopia. PloS one, 15(11), e0241270.
13. Barasa, V., & Waldman, L. (2022). Exploring the Intersection of Sanitation, Hygiene, Water, and Health in Pastoralist Communities in Northern Tanzania. Institute of Development Studies.
14. Bateman, M., & Engel, S. (2018). To shame or not to shame—that is the sanitation question. Development Policy Review, 36(2), 155-173.
15. Biran, A., Jenkins, M. W., Dabrase, P., & Bhagwat, I. (2011). Patterns and determinants of communal latrine usage in urban poverty pockets in Bhopal, India. Tropical medicine &
16. Bokea, j. O. (2020). Implementation of Community Led Total Sanitation program in Kajiado County, Kenya.
17. Bwire, B. (2010). Breaking shit taboos: CLTS in Kenya. Participatory learning and action, 61(1), 91-96. Cameron JE. A three-factor model of social identity. Self-Identity, 3(3):239–62.
18. Cagnet, D. L. (2022). Facilitators to becoming and remaining open defecation free in Uganda: Implications for community-led total sanitation programming.
19. Ejemot, R. I. (2008). Hand Washing 3. For Preventing Diarrhea. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 1. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(2). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1965
20. Fewtrell, L, Kaufmann, R.B., Ka,y D., Enanoria, W., Haller, L., & Colford, J.M. (2015). Water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to reduce diarrhoea in less developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 5:42–52
21. Galan, I.D., Kim, S.S., Graham, J.P. (2013). Exploring changes in open defecation prevalence in subSaharan Africa based on national level indices. BMC Public Health, 13(527).
22. García-Avilés, J. A. (2020). Diffusion of innovation. The international Encyclopedia of media psychology, 1-8.
23. Harter, M., Mosch, S., & Mosler, H. (2018). How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique. BMC Public Health, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5287-y
24. Harvey, P. (2011). Community-led total sanitation, Zambia: stick, carrot or balloon? Waterlines, 30(2), 95105.
25. Hendrix, S. J. (2020). Exploring determinants of community led total sanitation (clts) on latrine adoption among rural cambodians utilizing the diffusion of innovation theory: a pragmatic approach. The University of Alabama.
26. Huda, T. M. N., Unicomb, L., Johnston, R. B., Halder, A. K., Sharker, M. A. Y., & Luby, S. P. (2012). Interim evaluation of a large scale sanitation, hygiene and water improvement programme on childhood diarrhea and respiratory disease in rural Bangladesh. Social science & medicine, 75(4), 604-611.
27. Humphrey JH (2009). Child undernutrition, tropical enteropathy, pit-latrines, and handwashing. Lancet, 374:1032–1035. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(09)60950-8.
28. Hutton, G., & Chase, C. (2016). The knowledge base for achieving the sustainable development goal targets on water supply, sanitation and hygiene. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(6), 536. international health, 16(7), 854-862.
29. Jenkins, Marion W., & Steven S. (2006). Rethinking Sanitation: Lessons and innovation for sustainability and success in the new millennium. Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper, United Nations Development Programme, New York.
30. Jenkinsa, M., & Beth, S. (2014). Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
31. Johnson, K. B., Jacob, A., & Brown, M. E. (2013). Forest cover associated with improved child health and nutrition: evidence from the Malawi Demographic and Health Survey and satellite data. Global Health Science and Practice, 1(2), 237-248.
32. Kouassi, H. A. A., Andrianisa, H. A., Traoré, M. B., Sossou, S. K., Nguematio, R. M., & Djambou, M. D. (2023a). Factors influencing community-led total sanitation (CLTS) implementation abandonment before achieving open defecation-free (ODF) status: case study of the Central-Western region of Burkina Faso. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(60), 125628-125645.
33. Kouassi, H. A. A., Andrianisa, H. A., Traoré, M. B., Sossou, S. K., Nguematio, R. M., Ymélé, S. S. S., & Ahossouhe, M. S. (2023b). Review of the slippage factors from open defecation-free (ODF) status towards open defecation (OD) after the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach implementation. International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 250, 114160.
34. Lomas, B., & Hammersley-Mather, R. (2016). Shocking imagery and cultural sensitivity: a CLTS case study from Madagascar.
35. McMichael, C. (2018). Pit-latrine Talk: Eliminating Open Defecation and Improved Sanitation in Nepal. Medical anthropology, 37, (4): 294-310.
36. Mosler, H., Mosch, S., & Harter, M. (2018). Is Community-Led Total Sanitation connected to the rebuilding of latrines? Quantitative evidence from Mozambique. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0197483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197483
37. Mumin, A. A., Mohammed, A. R., Issahaku, T., & Musah, B. I. (2023). How has community-led total sanitation (CLTS) affected open defecation in urban communities in the Tamale Metropolis?. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-16.
38. Nanyim, J. K., Gbeti, C., Abubakari, A., Issahaku, A. R., & Wumbei, A. (2022). An Evaluation of the CLTS Implementation Process from the Beneficiary Perspective: A Cross-sectional Study from the Bole District of the Savannah Region, Ghana.
39. Nanyim, J. K., Gbeti, C., Abubakari, A., Issahaku, A. R., & Wumbei, A. (2022). An Evaluation of the CLTS Implementation Process from the Beneficiary Perspective: A Cross-sectional Study from the Bole District of the Savannah Region, Ghana.
40. Nunbogu, A. M., Harter, M., & Mosler, H. (2019). Factors associated with levels of latrine completion and consequent latrine use in northern Ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060920
41. Okolimong, C. D., Ndejjo, R., Mugambe, R. K., & Halage, A. A. (2020). Effect of a Community- Led Total Sanitation Intervention on Sanitation and Hygiene in Pallisa District, Uganda.
42. Rama, M. (2016). CLTS versus other approaches to promote sanitation: rivalry or complementarity.
43. Tough, H., Abdallah, A. K., Zemp, E., & Molesworth, K. (2023). Gender dynamics of community-led total sanitation interventions in Mpwapwa District, Tanzania. Global Public Health, 18(1), 2053733.
44. Tribbe, J., Zuin, V., Delaire, C., Khush, R., & Peletz, R. (2021). How do rural communities sustain sanitation gains? Qualitative comparative analyses of community-led approaches in Cambodia and Ghana. Sustainability, 13(10), 5440.
45. Tribbe, J., Zuin, V., Delaire, C., Khush, R., & Peletz, R. (2021). How Do Rural Communities Sustain Sanitation Gains? Qualitative Comparative Analyses of Community-Led Approaches in Cambodia and Ghana. Sustainability, 13(10), 5440. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105440
46. Venkataramanan, V., Crocker, J., Karon, A. J., & Bartram, J. (2018). Community-Led Total Sanitation: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of Evidence and Its Quality.
47. Victor, O. S., Michael, O. K., Ifedayo, S. I. O., & Olawumi, D. (2020). A Dive into the Challenges of Community-Led Total Sanitation [CLTS] in Nigeria.
48. Wasonga, J., Miyamichi, K., Hitachi, M., Ozaki, R., Karama, M., Hirayama, K., & Kaneko, S. (2023). Effects of Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) Boosting and Household Factors on Latrine Ownership in Siaya County, Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(18), 6781.
49. Yogananth, N., & Bhatnagar, T. (2018). Prevalence of open defecation among households with toilets and associated factors in rural south India: an analytical cross-sectional study. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 112(7), 349-360.
50. Zuin, V., Delaire, C., Peletz, R., Cock-Esteb, A., Khush, R., & Albert, J. (2019). Policy Diffusion in the Rural Sanitation Sector: Lessons from Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS). World Development, 124, 104643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104643