Abstract :

The purpose of this study was to analyze the characteristics of sidewalks and pedestrians, the level of service and the type of pedestrian crossing facilities that are appropriate on Jalan Raya Ubud. Primary data collection using manual survey methods, including road geometric data, pedestrian volume, pedestrian speed, volume of road crossers and vehicles. Secondary data collection use literature study methods which include the location maps and population. Data analysis based on the guidelines of the Ministry of Public Works (2014). Based on the results of the analysis, the average width of the North and South sidewalks is 1.4 m with an average effective width of the North sidewalk is 0.9 m, while on the South sidewalk the average effective width of the sidewalk is 0.95 m. The largest pedestrian flow on the North and South Sidewalks on weekdays and holidays occurs in the afternoon with a total of 520 p/h with an average speed of 4.32 km/h, a density of 12 p/100 m2 and 8 m2/p pedestrian space for the North sidewalk, and the South sidewalk with a flow of 389 p/ h with an average speed of 3.72 km/h, a density of 10 p/100 m2, and 10 m2/p pedestrian space. On holidays, the flow is 744 p/ h with an average speed of 2.63 km/ h, a density of 28 p/100 m2 , and a pedestrian space of 4 m2 /org for the North sidewalk. While the South sidewalk has a flow of 351 org / hour with an average speed of 4.06 km / hour, a density of 9 org / 100 m2 , and a space of 12 m2 /org. The level of service of the North and South sidewalks on weekdays is included in the “B” category. The level of service of the North sidewalk on holidays is in the “C” category and the South sidewalk is in the “B” category.

---

Keywords :

Level of Service, Pedestrian Crossing Facility Type, Pedestrian Trajectories, Sidewalk Characteristics, Ubud tourist destination., Walking Speed

---

References :

1. Agah Muhammad Mulyadi, Hendra Hendrawan, Anita Vitriana, & Nugroho, A. (2022). Walkability and importance assessment of pedestrian facilities on central business district in capital city of Indonesia. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 16(22), 1-13.
2. BPS Kabupaten Gianyar. (2024). Kabupaten Gianyar dalam Angka 2024.
3. Gao, W., Qian, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, Z., Zhou, M., & Aminpour, F. (2022). Assessment of sidewalk walkability: Integrating objective and subjective measures on identical context-based sidewalk features. Sustainable Cities and Society, 87(December 2022).
4. Kementrian PUPR. (2023). Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki.
5. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum, Pedoman Perencanaan Penyediaan dan Pemanfaatan Prasarana dan Sarana Jaringan Pejalan Kaki di kawasan Perkotaan (Patent 03/PRT/M/2014), (2014).
6. Pedoman Perencanaan Teknis Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki (Patent SE Menteri PUPR No.02/SE?M?2018), (2018).
7. S, Purbanta, R., & Negara, W. (2013). Analisis Tingkat Pelayanan Fasilitas Pejalan Kaki (Studi Kasus Jalan Diponogoro depan Mall Ramayana). Jurnal Ilmiah Elektronik Ifrastruktur Teknik Sipil, 2(1).
8. RakaMandi, N. B. (2022). Pedestrian Facilities as the Core of Sustainable Public Transport: A Case Study of Kuta-Bali Tourism Destination. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 5(01 Januari 2022), 256-266.
9. Yasar, H. G. K. M. A. A.-u.-h. (2019). Effect of Sidewalk Vendors on Pedistrian Walking Speed and Lateral Position: A Study in Addis Ababa, Ethopia. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Management, 1(2), 27-34.