Abstract :

Indonesian enterprises are in the early stage of adopting generative AI tools. A report from Forbes shows that AI companies around the world have raised around $354 billion for Generative AI technology. One of the key drivers of those funding is to capitalize on the growing market demand. Market demand in Indonesia for Generative AI technology is explored by studying the intention to adopt such tools among enterprise users. Quantitative study reveals that perceived ease of use is a factor influencing the user’s intention to adopt Generative AI Tools in Indonesian enterprises. Recommendations for further research includes exploring more predictive factors and reaching broader target audiences for the study.

---

Keywords :

AI adoption intention model, Generative AI tools, Indonesian enterprises, Intention to adopt, perceived ease of use

---

References :

1. Fu, X. 2023. Quantifying the economic benefits of artificial intelligence technology. Proceedings of the 4th Management Science Informatization and Economic Innovation Development Conference, MSIEID 2022, December. 
2. Gudigantala, N., Madhavaram, S., & Bicen, P. 2023. An AI decision‐making framework for business value maximization. AI Magazine, 44(1), 67-84.
3. McCorduck, P. and Cfe, C. 2004. Machines Who Think: A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence (2nd ed.). A K Peters/CRC Press. 
4. Forbes 2023. Generative AI Is Generating Hype But Can It Generate Value? https://www.forbes.com/sites/lawrencewintermeyer/2023/10/26/generative-ai-is-generating-hype-but-can-it-generate-value/?sh=146750ace81f
5. Baker-Brunnbauer, J. 2021. Management perspective of ethics in artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics.
6. McKinsey 2022. The state of AI in 2022—and a half decade in review https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2022-and-a-half-decade-in-review
7. Dawid, H., Decker, R., Hermann, T., Jahnke, H., Klat, W., König, R., & Stummer, C. 2016. Management science in the era of smart consumer products: challenges and research perspectives. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 25(1), 203-230.
8. Lee, J H., Suh, T., Roy, D., & Baucus, M S. 2019. Emerging Technology and Business Model Innovation: The Case of Artificial Intelligence. 
9. Judijanto, L., Muda Priyangan, D., Muthmainah, H. N., & Jata, I. W. 2023. The influence of data quality and machine learning algorithms on AI prediction performance in business analysis in indonesia. The Eastasouth Journal of Information System and Computer Science, 1(02), 75-86.
10. Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S. and Dwivedi, Y.K. 2022. Theorizing artificial intelligence acceptance and digital entrepreneurship model, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 1138-1166.
11. Na, S., Heo, S., Han, S., Shin, Y., & Roh, Y. 2022. Acceptance model of artificial intelligence (ai)-based technologies in construction firms: applying the technology acceptance model (tam) in combination with the technology–organisation–environment (toe) framework. Buildings, 12(2), 90.
12. Chan, K. and Zary, N. 2019. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. Jmir Medical Education, 5(1), e13930
13. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Morris, Michael & Davis, Gordon & Davis, Fred. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 27. 425-478
14. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. 2012. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
15. Davis, F. D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. 
16. Parra-Lopez, E., Bulchand-Gidumal, J., Gutierrez-Tano, D. and Dıaz-Armas, R. 2011, Intentions to use social media in organizing and taking vacation trips”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27 No. 2.
17. Hult, G., Hair, J., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. 2018. Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3), 1-21. 
18. Hair, Joseph & Ringle, Christian & Sarstedt, Marko. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. 19. 139-151. 
19. Arseven, Z., Kılıç, A., & Şahin, Ş. 2016. Value-eroding teacher behaviors scale: a validity and reliability study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1378-1386.
20. Kock, Ned. 2016. Hypothesis Testing with Confidence Intervals and P Values in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration. 12. 1-6.