Abstract :

GHG emission remain the main issue for cement industry as well as global GHG emission record. GHG emission was still considered as the main contributor of global warming. Therefore, cement industry has an obligation to decarbonize its business. However, decarbonization is a complex process that need to be treated as an ecosystem. Low carbon cement is one of the objectives to decrease GHG emission in cement industry. The production of low carbon cement could be seen as an ecosystem that the stakeholders/actors within the ecosystem interacted each other. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis could be used to evaluate the importance of the stakeholders/actors and the pattern of the interaction. By combining these two tools, there are 10 stakeholders/actors that should be put in main consideration. Eigenvector centrality and betweenness centrality were used to prioritize and evaluate the stakeholders. Construction company is the most popular stakeholder/actor and the most important intermediary actor due to its eigenvector centrality and betweenness centrality value of 0,347 and 35,610 respectively. Meanwhile construction company was also classified in a Player quadrant in power-interest matrix grid. In summary, cement company could prioritize its strategic initiative to engage with 10 most important and intermediaries’ actors in low carbon cement ecosystem.

---

Keywords :

betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, GHG emission, low carbon cement ecosystem, social network analysis, Stakeholder analysis.

---

References :

1. Ackerman, F. and Eden, C. 2010. Strageic Management of Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. Long Range Planning 44 (2011) 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.08.001
2. Ahmad, et. al. 2019. Comparing and Combining Social Network Analysis and Stakeholder Analysis for Natural Resources Governance. Journal of Environmental Development 32(2019) 100451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.07.001
3. Borgatti, Stephen P. et.al. 2018. Analyzing Social Network 2^nd Chennai. SAGE Publications Ltd
4. Crackenell, A.P and Varotsos, C.A. 2022. Understanding Global Climate Change: Modelling The Climatic System and Human Impacts. CRC Press
5. Gagg, Collin R. 2014. Cement and Concrete as an Engineering Material: An Historic Appraisal and Case Study Analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 40 (2014) 114-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.02.004
6. Grimble, Robin and Wellard, Kate. 1997. Stakeholder Methodologies in Natural Resource Management: A Review Principls, Context, Experience, and Opportunities. Agricultural System 55(2), 173-193.
7. Moore, James F., 1997. The Death of Competition: Leadership & Strategy In The Age of Business Ecosystem. New York: HarperCollinsPublishers
8. Prakasan, S., Getu, R., and Palaniapan, S. 2019. Study of Energy Use and CO₂ Emissions in Manufacturing Clinker and Cement, Journal of The Institution of Engineer (India) Series A. November 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00409-4
9. Prell, C. Hubacek, K. and Reed, M. 2009. Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resources Management. Society and Natural Resources, 22(6), 501-518. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802199202
10. Reed, M.S, et.al 2009. Who’s in and Why? A Typology of Stakeholder Analysis Methods for Natural Resources Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949
11. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York. Cambridge University Press.
12. https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/
13. United Nations Environment Programme (2023). Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record – Temperatures hit new highs, yet world fails to cut emissions (again). Nairobi.
14. https://www.sig.id/laporan-keberlanjutan
15. Indonesian Cement Association internal data