Abstract :

The findings of WDP opinions in several districts/cities in North Sumatra province indicate that there are one or more financial administrations that do not or have not met the standards of good financial management. Non-compliance with legislation will result in an increased tendency for fraud. With the spread of fraud cases, it is necessary to prevent and detect financial management fraud using the fraud hexagon theory. This research is a quantitative study which aims to analyze the influence of the fraud hexagon elements (pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance and collusion) on regional financial management fraud with the internal control system as a moderating variable. The population of this study was 34 Provincial/Regency/City Governments. Meanwhile, the number of samples was 7 Provincial/Regency/City governments. Then, 3 OPDs (Regional Apparatus Organizations) related to regional financial management were taken from each sample, namely Bappeda as OPD for regional financial planning, Regional Financial and Asset Agency as OPD for budgeting, implementation, administration, reporting and regional financial accountability, and Provincial/Regency/City Inspectorate as OPD for internal supervision of regional finance. In each OPD, 5 Regional Financial Management officials were taken, so that the total number of observations was 105 respondents. The analysis technique used is Partial Least Square (PLS), which is a component or variantbased Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results of data research prove that pressure has a significant effect on fraud. Opportunity has a significant effect on fraud. Rationalization has a significant effect on fraud. Capability has a significant effect on fraud. Arrogance has a significant effect on fraud and collusion has a significant effect on fraud. Meanwhile, the results of the moderation test show that the internal control system is unable to moderate the influence of the fraud hexagon elements (pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance and collusion) on regional financial management fraud.

---

Keywords :

Fraud Hexagon, internal control system, Regional Financial Management Fraud

---

References :

1. ACFE Indonesia. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia. In Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.
2. Ahmad, A. A. B. (2019). The Moderating role of Internal Control on the Relationship between Accounting Information System and Detection of Fraud: The Case of the Jordanian Banks. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 8(1). doi: 6007/ijarems/v8-i1/5548
3. Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud Examination. In South-Western Cengage Learning. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
4. Apriani, U. (2020). Pengaruh Komponen-Komponen Fraud Star Terhadap Korupsi Dengan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP) Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Magister Akuntansi Trisakti, 7(1), 1– doi: 10.25105/jmat.v7i1.6311
5. Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Beneish Model Pada Perusahaan Yang Menerapkan Asean Corporate Governance Scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101. doi: 10.17509/jaset.v9i1.5259
6. Asikin, D. F. (2018). Analisis Peranan Inspektorat dalam Pengawasan Fraud Perjalanan Dinas (Studi Kasus pada Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Bantul). Universitas Gajah Mada.
7. Desviana, D., Basri, Y. M., & Nasrizal, N. (2020). Analisis Kecurangan Pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(1), 50– doi: 10.21632/saki.3.1.50-73
8. Clariesta, V. (2023). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Pengolaan Dana Desa (Studi Pada Pemerintah Desa Kecamatan Sidoarjo). https://erepository.uwks.ac.id/14690/
9. Crowe, H. (2011). Putting the freud in fraud: Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. In Howart, Crowe.
10. Daft, R, L. (1994). Organisasi Theory and Design. Four Edition. Access Distributor Pte. Ltd. Singapore
11. Dewi, L. U., Dewi, P. E. D. M., & Julianto, I. P. (2020). Pengaruh Greed, Opportunity, Pressure, dan Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal terhadap Financial Statement Fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika, 10(1). balipost.com
12. S. A. (2018). Fraud Pentagon dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1–22. doi: 10.14421/ekbis.2018.2.1.1060
13. Fatimah, D., Sari R. N., & Rasuli, M. (2014). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Intern, kepatuhan terhadap Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya dan Umur Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Penerimaan Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian pada Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Seluruh Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 3(1), 1-16.
14. Gede, I. M., Putra, D., Ayu, N., & Trisna, W. (2022). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Hexagon terhadap Kecurangan Akuntansi Pada Badan Usaha Milik Desa di Kabupaten Buleleng. 12(2), 339–
15. Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–
16. Hatch, M. J. & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image, European Journal of Marketing, 31(6), 356-65.
17. Iswantari, V., & Sasongko, N. (2023). Detection of Financial Statement Fraud Using Hexagon Theory Analysis and Covid-19 (Empirical Study of Food and Beverage Manufacturing Companies Listed on the IDX in 2016-2021). The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 7(1), 335– www.theijbmt.com
18. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm, Managing Behavior Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305– doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
19. (2013). Forensic Fraud. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi.
20. Marks, J. (2012). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. In United States of America: Crowe Horwath LLP. https://www.crowe.com/
21. Nalurita, Nuhoni, 2015, Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Kepatuhan terhadap Perundang-undangan, dan Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah terhadap Kredibilitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah di Indonesia, Tesis Tidak Dipublikasikan, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
22. Oktavia, S., Bahari, A., & Kartika, R. (2022). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Hexagon Theory Terhadap Fraud Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomika, 12(2), 275-284. doi: 37859/jae.v12i2.4207
23. Putra, M. Y. S. (2019). Pengaruh Kompetensi SDM dan Implementasi Akuntansi Akrual serta Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Daerah. 63–
24. Rosifa, D., & Supriatna, I. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan pada Pengelolaan Dana Desa (Survei pada Pemerintahan Desa di Kabupaten Bandung Barat). Indonesian Accounting Research Journal, 2(3), 218– doi: 10.35313/iarj.v2i3.4117 .
25. Sagala, S. G., & Siagian, V. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Model Terhadap Fraudulent Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2019. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 245– doi: 10.28932/jam.v13i2.3956.
26. Saputra, I. K. A., Sudiana, I. W., & Putra, I. P. D. S. (2020). Pengaruh Independensi Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan (Fraud) Dengan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Sebagai Variabel Moderasi Pada Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (LPD) Se-Kecamatan Ubud. Hita Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 1(1), 142– doi: 10.32795/hak.v1i1.770
27. Setiawan, W. (2012). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah (LKPD) Terhadap Tingkat Korupsi Pemerintah Daerah di Universitas Diponegoro. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/225555222.pdf
28. Singleton, T., Bologna, G., Lindquist, R., & Singleton, A. (2006). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. In John Wiley & Sons, Inc (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
29. Stewart, J. & Clarke, M. (1988). Understanding the Management to Local Government. Managing Local Government. Longman.
30. Sutarto, (2002), Dasar-Dasar Organisasi, Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta
31. (2014). Audit Berbasi ISA (International Standards on Auditing). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
32. Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing Theory of Fraud: The S.C.O.R.E Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–
33. Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–