Abstract :

Caprycoal Mining Company, located in East Kalimantan, Indonesia, strives to be a leading coal supplier. The performance management system of Caprycoal Mining Company for power plant operators is the subject of this research, which critically evaluates and suggests a redesign. It incorporates the Resource-Based View (RBV), Performance Management Theory, Goal-Setting Theory, and Management by Objectives (MBO), focusing on strategic resources, clear objectives, and structured management. Using Soft System Methodology (SSM) and semi-structured interviews, significant gaps were identified, such as the lack of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and mechanisms for managing competency data. Existing training programs were unstructured and misaligned with operational demands. The study proposes a comprehensive overhaul, including a structured KPI framework based on SMART goals aligned with organizational objectives and a digital competency management system for efficient data handling. Regular, structured feedback and advanced data analytics are emphasized for continuous performance monitoring. Additionally, a formal rewards program is recommended to motivate and retain high-performing employees by linking performance outcomes with individual and team rewards.

---

Keywords :

Digitalization, Goal-Setting Theory, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Performance Management System, Power plant operators, Technical competency

---

References :

1. Abernethy, M. A., Horne, M., Lillis, A. M., Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2005). A multi-method approach to building causal performance maps from expert knowledge. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.03.003
2. Aguinis, H., & Pierce, C. A. (2008). Enhancing the relevance of organizational behavior by embracing performance management research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.493
3. Akhtar, I. (2016). Research Design. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2862445
4. Andrews, B. H., Carpentier, J. J., & Gowen, T. L. (2001). A New Approach to Performance Measurement and Goal Setting. Interfaces, 31(3), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.31.3.44.9629
5. Awan, S. H., Habib, N., Shoaib Akhtar, C., & Naveed, S. (2020). Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement. SAGE Open, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020969383
6. Bertram, M. (2016). Theoretical foundation: The resource-based view (RBV) of the firm. In M. Bertram (Ed.), The Strategic Role of Software Customization: Managing Customization-Enabled Software Product Development (pp. 67–102). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14858-4_3
7. Bingham, C. B., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2008). Position, leverage and opportunity: a typology of strategic logics linking resources with competitive advantage. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(2–3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1386
8. Bipp, T., & Kleingeld, A. (2011). Goal‐setting in practice. Personnel Review, 40(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111118630
9. Bogner, W. C., & Bansal, P. (2007). Knowledge Management as the Basis of Sustained High Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00667.x
10. Castillo Arias, L. F. P. (2021). La gestión por competencias para el desarrollo organizacional en la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Industrial Data, 24(1), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.15381/idata.v24i1.16287
11. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft Systems Methodology. In Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide (pp. 191–242). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4_5
12. Clulow, V., Gerstman, J., & Barry, C. (2003). The resource‐based view and sustainable competitive advantage: the case of a financial services firm. Journal of European Industrial Training, 27(5), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590310469605
13. Cohanier, B. (2014). What qualitative research can tell us about performance management systems. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(4), 380–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2013-0023
14. Collis, D. J. (1994). Research Note: How Valuable Are Organizational Capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 143–152. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486815
15. Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2004). Performance Management: A Model and Research Agenda. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 556–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00188.x
16. Galbreath, J. (2005). Which resources matter the most to firm success? An exploratory study of resource-based theory. Technovation, 25(9), 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.02.008
17. Hall, R. (1992). The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2486410
18. Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabiliites to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140804
19. Hermanto, R., Putro, U. S., Novani, S., & Kijima, K. (2022). Overcoming the challenge of those new with SSM in surfacing relevant worldviews for action to improve. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(9), 1919–1934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1970485
20. Jacobs, B. (2004). Using Soft Systems Methodology for Performance Improvement and Organisational Change in the English National Health Service. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12(4), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0966-0879.2004.00444.x
21. Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.36
22. Komalasari, N., Murad, D. F., Agustine, D., Irsan, M., Budiman, J., & Fernando, E. (2018). Effect of Education, Performance, Position and Information Technology Competency of Information Systems to Performance of Information System. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRITI.2018.8864437
23. Kraaijenbrink, J., Spender, J.-C., & Groen, A. J. (2010). The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques. Journal of Management, 36(1), 349–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350775
24. Kroll, A. (2023). Relational Mechanisms to Explain Collective Performance Data Use. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(2–3), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvad002
25. Latham, G. P., Borgogni, L., & Petitta, L. (2008). Goal Setting and Performance Management in the Public Sector. International Public Management Journal, 11(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490802491087
26. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New Developments in and Directions for Goal-Setting Research. European Psychologist, 12(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290
27. Latham, G. P., & Yukl, G. A. (1976). Effects of Assigned and Participative Goal Setting on Performance and Job Satisfaction: Erratum. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(3), 272–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077977
28. Lin, Y., & Wu, L. Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019
29. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
30. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127
31. Mento, A. J., Locke, E. A., & Klein, H. J. (1992). Relationship of goal level to valence and instrumentality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.395
32. Mento, A. J., Steel, R. P., & Karren, R. J. (1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance: 1966–1984. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39(1), 52–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90045-8
33. Mills, J. A., Teplitsky, C., Arroyo, B., Charmantier, A., Becker, Peter. H., Birkhead, T. R., Bize, P., Blumstein, D. T., Bonenfant, C., Boutin, S., Bushuev, A., Cam, E., Cockburn, A., Côté, S. D., Coulson, J. C., Daunt, F., Dingemanse, N. J., Doligez, B., Drummond, H., … Zedrosser, A. (2015). Archiving Primary Data: Solutions for Long-Term Studies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(10), 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.07.006
34. Neubert, M. J., & Dyck, B. (2016). Developing sustainable management theory: goal-setting theory based in virtue. Management Decision, 54(2), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2014-0312
35. Peng, M. W. (2001). The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6), 803–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700611
36. Salkind, N. (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
37. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38. Travers, C. J., Morisano, D., & Locke, E. A. (2015). Self‐reflection, growth goals, and academic outcomes: A qualitative study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12059
39. Tripathi, K., & Agrawal, M. (2014). Competency Based Management In Organizational Context: A Literature Review. In Global Journal of Finance and Management (Vol. 6, Issue 4). http://www.ripublication.com