Abstract :

Computational thinking involves the use of computer science principles to solve complex problems, extending beyond simple programming to various life applications. In today’s educational landscape, the promotion of these skills in the classroom is critical, yet students’ computational thinking skills remain underdeveloped due to inadequate learning models. Key indicators of computational thinking include problem decomposition, algorithmic thinking, pattern recognition, abstraction, and generalization. This study presents RBL-STEM learning activities aimed at enhancing students’ computational thinking through solving the Strong Rainbow Antimagic Coloring or SRAC problem and applying it to multi-step time series forecasting on river erosion using Graph Neural Networks or GNN. The research adopts a qualitative narrative method, beginning with the development of a prototype for multi-step time series forecasting on river erosion using SRAC and GNN, and progressing to the formulation of RBL-STEM learning steps. The results include a comprehensive RBL-STEM learning framework ready for implementation in future research. Learning framework offers student and educator a structured approach to integrating STEM on real life issues. By employing RBL-STEM, students are encouraging to solve river erosion problem systematically based on RBL stages. These finding suggest that the implementation of RBL-STEM with innovative mathematical problems such as SRAC can enhance students’ combinatorial skills, leading to practical solutions for everyday issues through education.

---

Keywords :

Computational Thinking Skills, GNN, Multi-step Time Series Forecasting, RBL-STEM, River Erosion, SRAC

---

References :

1. H. Yuan, C. H. Liu, and S. S. Kuang, “An Innovative and Interactive Teaching Model for Cultivating Talent’s Digital Literacy in Decision Making, Sustainability, and Computational Thinking,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 9, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13095117.
2. K. Nordby, A. H. Bjerke, and L. Mifsud, “Computational Thinking in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: a Systematic Review,” Digit. Exp. Math. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–49, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s40751-022-00102-5.
3. Angeli and M. Giannakos, “Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 105, p. 106185, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185.
4. L. Al Jabbar, Dafik, R. Adawiyah, E. R. Albirri, and I. H. Agustin, On the strong rainbow antimagic coloring of some special graph, vol. 1465, no. 1. Atlantis Press International BV, 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012030.
5. Lim and S. Zohren, “Time-series forecasting with deep learning: a survey,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 379, no. 2194, p. 20200209, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0209.
6. R. Ridlo, Indrawati, L. Afafa, S. Bahri, I. S. Kamila, and Rusdianto, “The effectiveness of research-based learning model of teaching integrated with computer simulation in astronomy course in improving student computational thinking skills,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1839, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1839/1/012027.
7. S. D. Gita, J. Waluyo, D. Dafik, and I. Indrawati, “Improving students’ thinking skills in the use of Chitosan as a preservative for processed meat using research-based learning materials with STEM approach,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, vol. 2468, no. 1.
8. S. Susiani, R. Hidayah, Suhartono, and M. Salimi, “Research-Based Learning (RBL): How to Improve Problem Solving Skills?,” vol. 326, no. Iccie 2018, pp. 411–417, 2019, doi: 10.2991/iccie-18.2019.71.
9. A. Hakim, Dafik, and I. M. Tirta, “The study of the implementation of research-based learning model to improve the students’ proving skills in dealing with the resolving efficient dominating set problem,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1836, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012059.
10. M. Jamali, N. Ale Ebrahim, and F. Jamali, “The role of STEM Education in improving the quality of education: a bibliometric study,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 819–840, 2023.
11. Sun, L. Hu, W. Yang, D. Zhou, and X. Wang, “STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 346–358, 2021.
12. B. Kafai and C. Proctor, “A revaluation of computational thinking in K–12 education: Moving toward computational literacies,” Educ. Res., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 146–151, 2022.
13. M. Merino-Armero, J. A. González-Calero, and R. Cozar-Gutierrez, “Computational thinking in K-12 education. An insight through meta-analysis,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 410–437, 2022.
14. Ye, B. Liang, O.-L. Ng, and C. S. Chai, “Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3, 2023.
15. Lee, S. Grover, F. Martin, S. Pillai, and J. Malyn-Smith, “Computational thinking from a disciplinary perspective: Integrating computational thinking in K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education,” J. Sci. Educ. Technol., vol. 29, pp. 1–8, 2020.
16. Becnel, “Emerging technologies in virtual learning environments,” 2019.
17. Sucianto, M. Irvan, and M. A. Rohim, “The Analysis of Student Metacognition Skill in Solving Rainbow Connection Problem under the Implementation of Research-Based Learning Model.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 593–610, 2019.
18. P. N. Puji and Z. R. Ridlo, “The Implementation of RBL-STEM Learning Materials to Improve Students Historical Literacy in Designing the Indonesian Batik Motifs.,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 16, no. 2, 2023.
19. Sagala, R. Umam, A. Thahir, A. Saregar, and I. Wardani, “The effectiveness of stem-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding,” Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 753–761, 2019.
20. Wahono, P.-L. Lin, and C.-Y. Chang, “Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, p. 36, 2020.
21. V Soboleva, T. N. Suvorova, S. V Zenkina, and M. I. Bocharov, “Developing Computational Thinking of Specialists of the Future through Designing Computer Games for Educational Purposes.,” Eur. J. Contemp. Educ., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 462–475, 2021.
22. Chen, Q. Zhao, P. Jiang, and M. Li, “Incorporating ecosystem services to assess progress towards sustainable development goals: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 806, p. 151277, 2022.
23. Alkair et al., “A STEM model for engaging students in environmental sustainability programs through a problem-solving approach,” Appl. Environ. Educ. Commun., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2023.
24. Saritepeci, “Developing computational thinking skills of high school students: Design-based learning activities and programming tasks,” Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 35–54, 2020.