Abstract :

The Newcastle Coal Price surge, currently at $457.80 in September 2022, drives coal companies, like one in East Kutai, to ramp up production by acquiring equipment and operators. However, compliance with Kutai East Region Regulation No 1 of 2022, requiring an 80% local workforce, complicates operator recruitment. This study aids management in selecting operator compositions in line with stakeholder expectations and regulations. Employing Problem Tree Analysis, Value-Focused Thinking, and Stakeholder Analysis, key challenges and alternative strategies were identified. Analyzing five options via the Analytic Hierarchy Process, the optimal choice, 100% skilled non-local operators, conflicts with regulation, necessitating negotiation for a suitable compromise. The fourth option, with adjusted operator compositions over time, emerges as the most viable solution. Implementation planning, utilizing the 5W+1H method, is crucial for addressing stakeholder concerns, ensuring compliance, reducing unemployment, and enhancing welfare. This research offers a framework for fulfilling operator qualifications while meeting stakeholder interests through strategic planning and negotiation.

---

Keywords :

---

References :

1. Ahdiat, A. (2023). Ini Negara Penghasil Batu Bara Terbesar 2022.

https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/01/06/ini-negara-penghasil-batu-bara-terbesar-2022

2. Direktorat Jenderal Mineral dan Batubara. (2022), Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Mineral dan Batubara 2022. Jakarta. Direktorat Jenderal Mineral dan Batubara.
3. Kementrian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral. (2022). Laporan Kinerja Kementrian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral 2022. Jakarta. Kementrian Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral.
4. Trading Economics. (2023). Coal – Price – Chart – Historical Data – News. https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/coal
5. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kutai Timur. (2023). Kabupaten Kutai Timur Dalam Angka 2023. Sangatta. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Kutai Timur.
6. Vargas, L.G., Moreno-Loscertales, C., Moreno Jimenez, J.M. (2023) Conflict resolution in the era of cognitive multicriteria decision-making: an AHP-retributive approach, International Transactions in Operational Research 30(3), pp. 1453-1478.
7. Wohlrab, R., Garlan, D. (2023). A negotiation support system for defining utility functions for multi-stakeholder self-adaptive systems. Requirements Engineering 28(1), pp. 3-22.
8. Tholen, G. (2023). Matchmaking under uncertainty: how hiring criteria and requirements in professional work are co-created. Employee Relations, 45(3), pp. 603–614.
9. Keller, P. A. (2005). Six Sigma Demystified. McGraw-Hill. 497.
10. Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2013). The handbook for quality management: A complete guide to operational excellence (Second Edition). McGraw-Hill.
11. Leigh L.Thompson. (2022). The Mind and Heart of Negosiator (Global Edition – Seventh Edition). Pearson.
12. Kartika Singh, Rahul, S., Pujh L., Singh. (2015). Decision Making in Recruitment Process Using AHP and ANP. International Journal of Advance Research In Science And Engineering (IJARSE).
13. Ramadan, K. A., Budi, S., M. Aziz, M. (2013). Decision Making and Evaluation System for Employee Recruitment Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES) PP.24-3.
14. Wei-Hung, H., Tsung-Sheng, C., Ming-Shang, H., Yi-Chia, C. (2011). Selection criteria of recruitment for information systems employees: Using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. African Journal of Business Management (AJBM) Vol. 5(15), pp. 6201-6209.
15. W. Saaty. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. ScienceDirect, 9(3–5), 161-176.
16. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard University Press Cambridge.
17. Parnell, G. S., & Hill, R. R. (2008). Value-Focused Thinking and the Challenges of the Long War. Military Operations Research, 13(2), 5–6. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43920753
18. Keeney, R. L. (2008). Applying Value-Focused Thinking. Military Operations Research, 13(2), 7–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43920754
19. Dillon-Merrill, R. L., Parnell, G. S., Buckshaw, D. L., Hensley, W. R., & Caswell, D. J. (2008). Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Decision Support Frameworks for Department of Defense Analyses. Military Operations Research, 13(2), 19– 31. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43920755
20. Austin, J., & Mitchell, I. M. (2008). Bringing Value Focused Thinking to Bear on Equipment Procurement. Military Operations Research, 13(2), 33–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43920756
21. Logullo, Y., Bigogno-Costa, V., Silva, A., & Belderrain, M. C. (2022). A prioritization approach based on VFT and AHP for group decision making: a case study in the military operations. Production, 32, e20210059. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20210059
22. Freeman, R. Edward. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston.
23. Freeman, R. Edward & McVea, John. (2001, March). A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.263511
24. Stefan Olander, & Anne Landin. (2005, May). Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002
25. Oxford College Marketing. (2018, April). What Is Mendelow’s Matrix And How Is It Useful?. Oxford College Marketing Blog. https://blog.oxfordcollegeofmarketing.com/2018/04/23/what-is-mendelows- matrix-and-how-is-it-useful/
26. Zahirudin, Iin Solihin, Tri Wiji Nurani, Ronny Irawan Wahju. (2022). Stakeholder Analysis: Operating Plan for Numana Integrated Fisheries Business Center Wakatobi Regency. Science and Technology Index, 6(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.29244/core.6.3.241-255