Abstract :

Population density and lower class marginalization due to the development of elite areas have alienated a community over its identity. The driving actors behind every social change exist, and they utilize a change through the villagers’ literacy power. Mainstreaming views on the actors’ active roles in social change essentially impact knowledge in the sociology of ethnic and cultural society. This study aims to describe the hidden actors behind the phenomenon of cultural movements that exist and develop national and international relations. This paper applies qualitative data collected in a participatory manner through interviews with key actors in Kampung Cempluk Festival. Focus group discussions were conducted with actors involved in every festival held by the community. Informants selected by snowball were then interviewed about their perceptions, motivations, and a value embodiment process. Researchers did the literature study through writings, releases, newspapers, mass media opinions, and several previous researches. The results indicate that alienation will foster citizens’ critical awareness of development and cultural values impacts. It is supported by driving actors who can read the potentials and opportunities in society. Thus, this research becomes the basis for policymakers in planning development which should prioritize a cultural approach and consider the threat of hidden power loss in society.

---

Keywords :

Driving Actors, Social Capital, Society

---

References :

1. Akbar, A., & Noviani, N. (2019). Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Perkembangan Teknologi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pgri Palembang.
2. Aprianto, R. (2016). Proses Kebertahanan Kampung Petempen Dalam Perkembangan Kota. JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN WILAYAH & KOTA. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v12i3.12909
3. Ardiansyah, M. N. (2019). Rembug Budaya Kampung Cempluk Festival ke-9, Nostalgia Perjuangan Masa Lalu. https://www.timesindonesia.co.id/read/news/230123/rembug-budaya-kampung-cempluk-festival-ke9-nostalgia-perjuangan-masa-lalu
4. Azka Nur Medha. (2017). Dukungan Modal Sosial Dalam Membangun Kolektifitas Masyaraat Untuk Beradaptasi Terhadap Fenomena Gentrifikasi di Kawasan Medokan Semampir. Tugas Akhir, PWK ITS.
5. Clark, E. (2004). The order and simplicity of gentrification-a political challenge. In Gentrification in a Global Context: The New Urban Colonialism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203392089
6. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure (1988). The American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://www.crcresearch.org/files-crcresearch/File/coleman_88.pdf
7. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Merrill Prentice Hall.
8. Edwards, R. C. (1975). The Social Relations of Production in The Firm and Labor Market Structure. Politics & Society, 5(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/003232927500500104
9. Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital? In Journal of Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X99000215
10. Getz, D., Andersson, T., & Carlsen, J. (2010). Festival management studies: Developing a framework and priorities for comparative and cross-cultural research. International Journal of Event and Festival Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17852951011029298
11. Gibson, C., Waitt, G., Walmsley, J., & Connell, J. (2010). Cultural festivals and economic development in nonmetropolitan Australia. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X09354382
12. Granovetter, M. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147958
13. Halim, A. K., & Jamaluddin, M. (2022). Motivation And Values Contained In The Tahlilan Tradition. Risalah, 8(1), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.31943/jurnal
14. Harahap, F. R. (2013). Dampak Urbanisasi Bagi Perkembangan Kota Di Indonesia. Society.https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v1i1.40

15. Hartik, A. (2021). Festival Kampung Cempuk 2021 di Malang Kembali Digelar Virtual. https://travel.kompas.com/read/2021/09/11/140232827/festival-kampung-cempuk-2021-di-malang-kembali-digelar-virtual?page=all

16. Iqbal, L. O. S. M., Surya, B., & Syafri, S. (2021). Kutub Pertumbuhan Dan Gentrifikasi Pada Kawasan Pinggiran Kota Makassar. Urban and Regional Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.35965/ursj.v3i1.607
17. Jaman, B. (2018). Exploring The Values Of Tahlilan Tradition For Development Of Social Interaction Topic In Social Studies Education Learning (Descriptive Study of Analysis in Gintung Ranjeng Village of Cirebon Regency). International Journal Pedagogy of Social Studies, 2(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijposs.v2i2.10157
18. Laily, N. (2020). Teori Sosial Empirik (M. Hidayaturahman (ed.)). edulitera.https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohammad-Hidayaturrahman/publication/341276119_Teori_SoSial_empirik/links/5eb77533a6fdcc1f1dcb2505/Teori-SoSial-empirik.pdf#page=161

19. Medha, A. N., & Ariastita, P. G. (2017). Pandangan Terhadap Fenomena Gentrifikasi dan Hubungannya dengan Perencanaan Spasial. Jurnal Teknik ITS. https://doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v6i2.25056
20. Mudiarta, K. G. (2017). Jaringan Sosial (Networks) dalam Pengembangan Sistem dan Usaha Agribisnis: Perspektif Teori dan Dinamika Studi Kapital Sosial. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v27n1.2009.1-12
21. (2017). Festival Kampung Cempluk Ditangani Penuh Karang Taruna.https://www.malangtimes.com/baca/14393/20160917/173146/festival-kampung-cempluk-ditangani-penuh-karang-taruna

22. Neuman, W. L. (1991). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon.
23. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The Prosperous Community. The American Prospect.
24. Raharti, R., Laras, T., & Oktavianti, O. (2021). Model Ketimpangan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Samudra Ekonomi Dan Bisnis. https://doi.org/10.33059/jseb.v12i2.2422
25. Redy, E. P. (2017). Liputan Kampung Cempluk Kab.Malang di TVONE edisi Inspirasi 29 maret 2017. http://japungnusantara.org/liputan-kampung-cempluk-kab-malang-di-tvone-edisi-inspirasi-29-maret-2017/
26. Shaw, K. (2008). Gentrification: What it is, why it is, and what can be done about it. Geography Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00156.x
27. Sirait, S. (2016). Religious Attitudes of Theological Tradisional In The Modern Muslim Community Study on Tahlilan in Kotagede Sangkot Sirait tahlilan. According to Muhammadiyah, tahlilan tradition is another form communities. Muhammadiyah teaching standards consider. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 10(02), 237–260.https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2016.10.2.237-260

28. Sondakh, S. I., & Gunawan, I. (2019). Gentrifikasi dan Kota: Kasus Kawasan Cikini-Kalipasir-Gondangdia. JSRW (Jurnal Senirupa Warna). https://doi.org/10.36806/jsrw.v7i2.75
29. Susilo, A. A. (2021, November 12). Kota Batu dalam Bayang-Bayang Gentrifikasi. Com. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5807467/kota-batu-dalam-bayang-bayang-gentrifikasi
30. Syahra, R. (2003a). Modal sosial: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 5(1), 1–22.http://www.jurnalmasyarakatdanbudaya.com/index.php/jmb/article/view/256

31. Syahra, R. (2003b). Modal sosial: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya.