Abstract :

The analysis of Environmental Impact Assessments (Amdal) in project plans and/or activities has been considered crucial to anticipate environmental pollution and damage within the environmental legal system regulated by Indonesia’s Environmental Law. Amdal serves as a tool for communities to challenge various development projects that pose threats to their environment. However, the government has recently sought to narrow the space for public participation and the functions of Amdal, as evident in Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2022 on Job Creation. This normative legal research aims to examine the urgency and concept of Amdal from a green constitution perspective. The study reveals that, from the green constitution perspective, the existence of Amdal with broad participation is essential. Instead of restricting it only to affected communities, as outlined in Presidential Regulation No. 2 of 2022 on Job Creation, participation in the preparation, submission of objections, and assessment of Amdal documents, according to the green constitution perspective, should be expanded not only to the general public but also to non-human entities, such as rivers, mountains, land, flora-fauna, and others. This study is expected to contribute to the revitalization of an ecocentric Amdal concept in line with green constitution principles, supporting efforts toward more ecocentric environmental protection. In a broader vision, this study is anticipated to contribute to the transformation of environmental law and the constitution to be more responsive to social-ecological justice.

---

Keywords :

Amdal, Green Constitution, Social-Ecological Justice

---

References :

 

1. Amania, Nila. 2020. “Problematika Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Sektor Lingkungan Hidup.” Syariati : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hukum 6(02). doi: 10.32699/syariati.v6i02.1545.
2. Arifin, Syamsul, Moh Anas Kholish, and Abul Ma’ali. 2023. “JIHAD EKOLOGI MELAWAN EKSPLOITASI TAMBANG EMAS DI BANYUWANGI SEBAGAI PENGUATAN GREEN CONSTITUTION.” Peradaban Journal of Religion and Society 2 (1): 105–21.
3. Artmann, Martina. 2023. “Human-Nature Resonance in Times of Social-Ecological Crisis–a Relational Account for Sustainability Transformation.” Ecosystems and People 19(1). doi: 10.1080/26395916.2023.2168760.
4. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2009. Green Constitution: Nuansa Hijau Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.
5. Berros, María Valeria. 2021. “Challenges for the Implementation of the Rights of Nature: Ecuador and Bolivia as the First Instances of an Expanding Movement.” Latin American Perspectives 48(3). doi: 10.1177/0094582X211004898.
6. Bethan, S. 2008. Penerapan Prinsip Hukum Pelestarian Fungsi Lingkungan Hidup Dalam Aktivitas Industri Nasional Sebuah Upaya Penyelamatan Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehidupan Antar Generasi. Bandung: Alumni.
7. Binawan, Al. Andang L. 2014. “JALAN TERJAL EKOKRASI.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 1(1). doi: 10.38011/jhli.v1i1.1.
8. Brown, Calum, and Mark Rounsevell. 2021. “How Can Social–Ecological System Models Simulate the Emergence of Social–Ecological Crises?” People and Nature 3(1). doi: 10.1002/pan3.10167.
9. Boyd, D R. 2017. The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World. ECW Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Hu1ZMQAACAAJ.
10. Budimansyah, Dasim, Susan Fitriasari, Dede Iswandi, Dwi Iman Muthaqin, and Nisrina Nurul Insani. 2021. “Green Constitution: Developing Environmental Law Awareness.” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Education (ICSSE 2020). Vol. 525.
11. Bullard, R D, and B Wright. 2009. Race, Place, and Environmental Justice After Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild, and Revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast. Avalon Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bynRDQAAQBAJ.

12. Chaidir, Ellydar, and Moza Dela Fudika. 2019. “Green Constitution as an Effort to Strengthen Environmental Legal Norms in Indonesia.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 10(2).
13. Debaty, E. 2017. The Rights of Nature: Theory and Implementation. Canada: University of Toronto.
14. Espinosa, Cristina. 2019. “Interpretive Affinities: The Constitutionalization of Rights of Nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 21(5). doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116379.
15. Febriyanti, Dwi, Sartika Nur Aini, Alya Vena Resta, and Raka Bagaskara. 2021. “Fungsi AMDAL Dalam Pengendalian Kerusakan Dan Pencemaran Lingkungan Setelah Diundangkannya UU Cipta Kerja.” Widya Pranata Hukum 3(2).
16. Feri, Andriawan, Muhammad Akib, and Agus Triono. 2021. “Pengendalian Kerusakan Lingkungan Akibat Aktivitas Pertambangan Di Kecamatan Pasir Sakti(Environmental Damage Control Due to Mining Activities in Pasir Sakti District).” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 1(1).
17. Giladi, Paul. 2014. “Liberal Naturalism: The Curious Case of Hegel.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22(2). doi: 10.1080/09672559.2014.886280.
18. Gunawan, Adi, and Achmad Taufik. 2023. “Scrutinizing The ‘Green Constitution’ Idea in The Amendment of The 1945 Constitution.” Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 9(1). doi: 10.35326/pencerah.v9i1.3048.
19. Halim, M. A. A., Amni, S. Z., & Maulana, M. (2023). Legal System in the Perspectives of HLA Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society, 2(1), 51-61.
20. Haryosetyo, Adimas. 2021. “Act of Cipta Kerja: An Environmental Legal Reversion from A Globalization Perspective.” International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 04(08). doi: 10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i8-23.
21. Hasim, Abdul. 2023. “PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MERUPAKAN BENTUK PENERAPAN GREEN CONSTITUTION DALAM UUD TAHUN 1945.” At-Tanwir Law Review 3(1). doi: 10.31314/atlarev.v3i1.2057.
22. Herlina, Nina, and Ukilah Supriyatin. 2021. “AMDAL SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENGENDALIAN DAMPAK LINGKUNGAN DALAM PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN DAN BERWAWASAN LINGKUNGAN.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 9(2). doi: 10.25157/justisi.v9i2.5610.
23. Herlindah, H., Kholish, M. A., & Galib, A. M. (2022). Suing the Oligarchy of Ownership and Control of Agricultural Land in Indonesia: A Maqashid Sharia Review of the Land of Agrarian Reform Objects (TORA) Exceeding the Maximum Boundary. Media Syari’ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial, 24(2).
24. Izzah, NN (2022). Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Penegakan Hukum Pidana Lingkungan Terhadap Praktek Illegal Logging di Indonesia. Jurnal Peradaban Hukum dan Masyarakat , 1 (1).
25. Khalistia, Sarah Firka, Salsabiila Tiara Aulia, and Addyana Belaputri. 2022. “Tinjauan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Berdasarkan Prosedur Dan Asas-Asas Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undang Yang Baik.” Padjadjaran Law Review 10(2). doi: 10.56895/plr.v10i2.1056.
26. Kodir, Abdul-, and In’amul Mushoffa. 2017. “Islam, Agrarian Struggle, and Natural Resources: The Exertion of Front Nahdliyin for Sovereignty of Natural Resources Struggle Towards Socio-Ecological Crisis in Indonesia.” KARSA: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture 25(1). doi: 10.19105/karsa.v25i1.1160.
27. Lavazza, Andrea, and Mirko Farina. 2022. “Experts, Naturalism, and Democracy.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 52(2). doi: 10.1111/jtsb.12321.
28. Lestari, Novianti, and Tundjung Herning Sitabuana. 2022. “Analisis Yuridis Izin Amdal Dalam Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Pasca Terbitnya Undang – Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.” Serina IV 1(1).
29. Libert Amico, Antoine, Claudia Ituarte-Lima, and Thomas Elmqvist. 2020. “Learning from Social–Ecological Crisis for Legal Resilience Building: Multi-Scale Dynamics in the Coffee Rust Epidemic.” Sustainability Science 15(2). doi: 10.1007/s11625-019-00703-x.
30. Luhukay, Roni Sulistyanto. 2021. “PENGHAPUSAN IZIN LINGKUNGAN KEGIATAN USAHA DALAM UNDANG UNDANG OMNIBUS LAW CIPTA KERJA.” Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 4(1). doi: 10.26877/m-y.v4i1.7827.
31. Medellu, Sabda Sarah Bunda, and Stephanie Elisandra Lorin Ledo. 2021. “Analisis Perubahan Pengaturan Amdal Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Asas Kelestarian Dan Keberlanjutan.” SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS 6(1). doi: 10.37477/sev.v6i1.320.
32. Moore, Jason W. 2017. “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of Our Ecological Crisis.” Journal of Peasant Studies 44(3). doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036.
33. Muhajir, N. 1998. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (VIII). . Yogyakarta: Rake Selatan.
34. Nur Fauzan, Muhammad Pasha. 2021. “MENINJAU ULANG GAGASAN GREEN CONSTITUTION: MENGUNGKAP MISKONSEPSI DAN KRITIK.” LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, Dan Agraria 1(1). doi: 10.23920/litra.v1i1.573.
35. Nur, Muhammad Ilham, Natasha Fraiskam, Renti Friska Pangaribuan, and Edo Clarita Samad. 2021. “Persetujuan Lingkungan Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Dan Dampak Dari UU Ciptaker Bagi Lingkungan.” Jurnal Syntax Admiration 2(12):2352–66. doi: 10.46799/jsa.v2i12.362.
36. Parastasia, C. (2024). Ekofeminisme Spritiualis pada Gerakan Perempuan Adat dalam Menolak Tambang Marmer di Mollo, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Peradaban Journal of Religion and Society, 3(1), 67-83.
37. Pietari, K. 2016. “ Ecuador’s Constitutional Rights of Nature: Implementation, Impacts, and Lessons Learned. .” WILLAMETTE ENV’T LJ, 37 38(38.).
38. Pinilih, Sekar Anggun Gading. 2018. “THE GREEN CONSTITUTION CONCEPT IN THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA.” Mimbar Hukum – Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 30(1). doi: 10.22146/jmh.28684.
39. Pradheksa, P. Y., Hazyimara, K., Haryadi, D., & Samsudin, A. (2023). Environmental Ethics in the Spiritual Perspective of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Islam: Aligning Roles and Finding Intersecting Paths. Peradaban Journal of Religion and Society, 2(2), 122-135.
40. Rakhman, Moh. Arief, and Haryadi Haryadi. 2020. “DINAMIKA PERAN NGO LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DALAM ARENA POLITIK LOKAL DI PROVINSI JAMBI.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 4(4). doi: 10.36312/jisip.v4i4.1468.
41. Rantelangan, Y. (2023). Ekologi: Pandangan Iman KristententangPermasalah Alam. Peradaban Journal of Religion and Society, 2(2), 136-150.
42. Rerung, Ovalda Mega. 2022. “Peran Greenpeace Dalam Mengatasi Illegal Logging Di Indonesia.” Jurnal PIR : Power in International Relations 7(1). doi: 10.22303/pir.7.1.2022.59-69.
43. Rohmah, Siti, In’amul Mushoffa, and M. Anas Kholish. 2022. Konstitusi Hijau Dan Ijtihad Ekologi: Genealogi, Konsep, Tantangan, Dan Masa Depan. Malang: UB Press.
44. Ruhiat, Fariz, Dudy Heryadi, and Akim -. 2019. “Strategi NGO Lingkungan Dalam Menangani Polusi Udara Di Jakarta (Greenpeace Indonesia).” Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) 8(1). doi: 10.25077/ajis.8.1.16-30.2019.
45. Rühs, Nathalie, and Aled Jones. 2016. “The Implementation of Earth Jurisprudence through Substantive Constitutional Rights of Nature.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 8(2).
46. Samosir, Agustina, and Ejodia Kakunsi. 2022. “Listen to the Earth, Listen to the Mother.” Indonesian Journal of Theology 10(1). doi: 10.46567/ijt.v10i1.247.
47. Samways, David. 2018. “Editorial Introduction: Anthropocentrism – the Origin of Environmental Degradation?” The Journal of Population and Sustainability 2(2). doi: 10.3197/jps.2018.2.2.5.
48. Scarpino, Philip V., and Roderick Frazier Nash. 1990a. “The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics.” The Journal of American History 76(4). doi: 10.2307/2936609.
49. Scarpino, Philip V., and Roderick Frazier Nash. 1990b. “The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics.” The Journal of American History 76(4). doi: 10.2307/2936609.
50. Schimmöller, Laura. 2020. “Paving the Way for Rights of Nature in Germany: Lessons Learnt from Legal Reform in New Zealand and Ecuador.” Transnational Environmental Law 9(3). doi: 10.1017/S2047102520000126.
51. Setiyowati, and Edy Lisdiyono. 2021. “The Legal Concept of Omnibus Law: Studying Environmental Permits From the Aspects of Benefit and Justice.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 25(2).
52. Shodikin, Miftakhul. 2023. “Penetapan Alam Sebagai Subjek Hukum.” Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia 2(1):18–38. doi: 10.59066/jmi.v2i1.219.
53. Sitompul, Asnita Tresia. 2022. “Job Creation Law’s Risks Towards Investment Efficiency and Business Convenience Regarding The Environment.” Administrative and Environmental Law Review 3(1):1–8. doi: 10.25041/aelr.v3i1.2339.
54. Smith, Graham. 2003. Deliberative Democracy and the Environment.
55. Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. 2015. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat . 17th ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
56. Sukananda, Satria, and Danang Adi Nugraha. 2020. “Urgensi Penerapan Analisis Dampak Lingkungan (AMDAL) Sebagai Kontrol Dampak Terhadap Lingkungan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1(2). doi: 10.18196/jphk.1207.
57. Sumodiningrat, Aprilian. 2023. “CONSTITUTIONAL DISOBEDIENCE PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI: KAJIAN TERHADAP PERPPU CIPTA KERJA.” Constitution Journal 2(1). doi: 10.35719/constitution.v2i1.50.
58. Supriyadi, Aditya Prastian. 2014. “Reduksi Hak Partisipasi Publik Pada Aturan Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Untuk Perizinan Berusaha Di Indonesia: Perspektif Green Constitution .” Jurnal HAM 14(1).
59. Suryawan, I. Gusti Bagus, and Ismail Aris. 2020. “Strengthening Environmental Law Policy and Its Influence on Environmental Sustainability Performance: Empirical Studies of Green Constitution in Adopting Countries.” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 10(2). doi: 10.32479/ijeep.8719.
60. Wibawa, Susila, and Kadek Cahya. 2019. “Mengembangkan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Untuk Pembangunan Berkelanjutan.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2(1). doi: 10.14710/alj.v2i1.79-92.
61. Tigar, Michael E., and Madeleine R. Levy. 2000. Law and the Rise of Capitalism. NYU Press.
62. Tobroni, Faiq. 2021. “Norma Pemajuan HAM Dan Degradasi Perlindungan Hak Pekerja Dalam UU Cipta Kerja.” Al Ahkam 17(1).
63. Usman, Abdurrahman Supardi. 2018. “LINGKUNGAN HIDUP SEBAGAI SUBJEK HUKUM: REDEFINISI RELASI HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN HAK ASASI LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DALAM PERSPEKTIF NEGARA HUKUM.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 26(1). doi: 10.22219/jihl.v26i1.6610.
64. Wagner, Ivan, and Suteki Suteki. 2019. “INDEPENDENSI PENILAIAN AMDAL SEBAGAI WUJUD PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP LINGKUNGAN HIDUP.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1(3). doi: 10.14710/jphi.v1i3.404-424.
65. Wicaksono, Agung Tri, Achmad Arby Nur, Sayidatul Mar’ah, and Ernawati Huroiroh. 2023. “Praktik Inkonstitusional Pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi Pada Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.” Verfassung: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara 2(1). doi: 10.30762/vjhtn.v2i1.217.
66. Wright, Erik Olin, and Kwang-Yeong Shin. 1988. “Temporality and Class Analysis: A Comparative Study of the Effects of Class Trajectory and Class Structure on Class Consciousness in Sweden and the United States.” Sociological Theory 6(1). doi: 10.2307/201914.
67. Nye, J S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=hTBxIMnpMloC.
68. Rohmah, Siti, Erna Herawati, and Moh Anas Kholish. 2021. Hukum Islam Dan Etika Pelestarian Ekologi: Upaya Mengurai Persoalan Lingkungan Di Indonesia. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
69. Shiva, V. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology and Politics. Bloomsbury Academic. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=i5eMFU4r5usC.
70. Yusa, I. Gede, and Bagus Hermanto. 2018. “Implementasi Green Constitution Di Indonesia: Jaminan Hak Konstitusional Pembangunan Lingkungan Hidup Berkelanjutan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15(2). doi: 10.31078/jk1524.
71. Zhang, Hao, Lunchen Tao, Biyun Yang, and Wenlong Bian. 2023. “The Relationship between Public Participation in Environmental Governance and Corporations’ Environmental Violations.” Finance Research Letters doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2023.103676.