Abstract :

The purpose of this study is to determine how different harvest ages and varieties affect the quantity and quality of fodder produced by hydroponically cultivated rice plants. The study design was a 2 x 3 factorial, completely randomized design (CRD) experiment with five replications. Tiller count, plant height, plant weight, and graph power were among the characteristics that were observed. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), and any differences were found using Duncan’s multiple area test. The plant height, number of tillers, plant weight, and dry matter production were all significantly impacted by the harvest age factor, according to the data. The variety factor is significantly influenced by the observation variables. The interaction between the parameters at 60 days of yield after planting (DYAP) has a significant impact on the variables plant height, plant weight, number of tillers, and dry matter production. The IR64 variety outperformed the Ciherang variety, according to the results of the proximate analysis, and the best harvest age in terms of crude protein, crude fiber, and crude fat content was at 40 days after planting, while the best TDN was at 60 DYAP. The IR64 cultivar produced the most biomass at a harvest age of 60 DYAP. In summary, the study’s findings suggest that hydroponically grown paddy forage has great promise in terms of the nutrients it can produce, yet biomass output is still lower than that of cutter grass, while dry matter production is higher than that of fodder.

---

Keywords :

iherang; Hydroponic; IR64; Paddy; Quality; Quantity

---

References :

1. Aini, N., & Azizah, N. 2018. Teknologi Budidaya Tanaman Sayuran Secara Hidroponik. Universitas Brawijaya Press.
2. Arifin, N., Hidayat, N., & Munasik, M. 2022. Pengaruh Kombinasi Pupuk Kandang dan NPK terhadap Kadar Protein Kasar dan Serat Kasar Rumput Odot (Pennisetum purpureum cv. Mott). ANGON: Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 4(1), 115–121.
3. DPKP Jogjakarta, 2023.Gebyar Perbenihan Tanaman Pangan Tahun. Deskripsi Benih Padi IR64 dan Ciherang. 2023. Di akses pada Nopember 5, 2023 dari https://dpkp.jogjaprov.go.id/
4. Hartadi, H., Reksohadiprodjo, S., Lebdosukojo, S., Tillman, A., Kearl, L., & Harris, L. (1980). Tabel-Tabel dari Komposisi Bahan Makanan Ternak untuk Indonesia. Utah, USA: The International Feedstuffs Institute
5. Humaerah, A. D. 2013. Budidaya Padi (Oryza sativa) Dalam Wadah dengan Berbagai Jenis Pupuk pada Sistem Tanam Berbeda. Agibusiness Journal, 7(2), 199–210.
6. Islami, R. Z., Indriani, N. P., Susilawati, I., Mustafa, H. K., Nurjannah, S., & Tanuwiria, U. H. 2021. Evaluasi Produksi Dan Kecernaan Bahan Kering Rumput Lapang Dan Rumput Gajah. Pastura, 11(1), 35.
7. Kide, W., Desai, B., & Kumar, S. 2015. Nutritional Improvement and Economic Value of Hydroponically Sprouted Maize Fodder. Life Science International Research Journal, 2(2), 76–79.
8. Kustyorini, T. I. W., Hadiani, D. P. P., & Sardin, P. 2020. Frekuensi Penyiraman Pupuk Organik Cair Terhadap Produksi Segar dan Bahan Kering Hidroponik Fodder Gandum (Triticum sp). Jurnal Sains Peternakan, 8(2), 132–137.
9. Maryani, A. T. 2012. Pengaruh Volume Air Terhadap Pertumbuhan Bibit Kelapa Sawit di Pembibitan Utama. Jurnal Program Studi Agroteknologi Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Jambi. 1 (2), 64 – 75.
10. Moningka, C. N. G., Ludong, D. P. M., & Rumambi, D. P. 2020. Kajian Irigasi Mikro Pada Sistem Hidroponik Padi (Oriza Sativa L.) Varietas Serayu Dalam Rumah Tanaman. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian (Agicultural Technology Journal, 11(1).
11. Nio Song, A. 2012. Evolusi Fotosintesis pada Tumbuhan. Jurnal Ilmiah Sains, 12(1), 28.
12. Patria, D. G., Sukamto, & Sumarji. 2021. Rice Science and Technology (Ilmu dan Teknologi Beras). In Januari (Vol. 53, Issue 7).
13. Rayani, T. F., Resti, Y., & Dewi, R. K. 2021. Kuantitas dan Kualitas Fodder Jagung, Padi dan Kacang Hijau dengan Waktu Panen yang Berbeda Menggunakan Smart hydroponic Fodder. Jurnal Ilmu Nutrisi Dan Teknologi Pakan, 19(2), 36–41.
14. Rini, M. V., H. N. Haqiqie, and H. Saputra. 2017. Respons Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Pada Varietas Ciherang Pada Tiga Dosis Fungi Mikorixa Arbuskular dan Dua Sistem Tanam. Agrotek Tropic. 5 (3), 144 – 150.
15. Roger Sneath and Felicity McIntosh. 2003. Review of Hydroponic Fodder Production for Beef Cattle October 2003. Journal of Cereal Science, 13(October), 94–101.
16. Rosliani, R., & Sumarni, N. 2005. Budidaya Tanaman Sayuran dengan Sistem Hidroponik. Monogafi, 27, 1–38.
17. Salo, S. 2019. Effects of Hydroponic Fodder Feeding on Milk Yield and Composition of Dairy Cow: Review. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 9(8), 1–8.
18. Sirait, J., Purwantari, N. D., & Simanihuruk, K. 2005. Produksi dan serapan nitrogen rumput pada naungan dan pemupukan yang berbeda. Jitv, 10(3), 175–181.
19. Sutoro, Suhartini, T., Setyowati, M., & Trijatmiko, K. R. 2015. Keragaman Malai Anakan dan Hubungannya dengan Hasil Padi Sawah (Oryza sativa) (Panicle Tiller Diversity and Its Relationship with Irrigated Rice Result (Oryza sativa)). Buletin Plasma Nutfah, 21(1), 9–17.
20. Wahyono, T., & Sadarman, S. 2020. Hydroponic Fodder: Alternatif Pakan Bernutrisi Di Masa Pandemi. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi Agibisnis Peternakan (Stap) Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, June, 558–566.
21. Waluyo, W. W. S., Suharti, S., & Abdullah, L. 2017. Metode Cepat Pendugaan Kandungan Protein Kasar pada Rumput Raja (Pennisetum purpurhoides) Menggunakan Nilai Indeks Warna Daun. Pastura, 5(2), 78.