Title : Coaching Effectiveness in Ideation of PLN LDP Level 3

Vol 7 No 2 (2024): Volume 07 Issue 02 February 2024

Article Date Published : 19 February 2024 | Page No.: 1275-1284 | Google Scholar | Crossref doi for this article

Abstract :

This study evaluates the effectiveness of coaching in the Ideation of Leadership Development Program (LDP) Level 3 at PT. PLN (Persero), focusing on Coach-Client Relationship theories (Diller et al., 2022) and the ADKAR model by Hiatt (2006). It investigates the influence of coach-coachee dynamics, including Working Alliance – Task and Goal, Perceived Empathy, Perceived Need Supportive Behavior, and Closeness, on the success of the coaching process. Additionally, the research assesses the ADKAR model’s components (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement) and Team Effectiveness based on Process Criteria (Effort-Related, Strategy-Related, and Knowledge & Skill-Related) in group project facilitation. Utilizing a quantitative approach, online questionnaires were distributed to 19 individuals who met the necessary criteria, including being participants in two coaching sessions of Ideation 3 Batch 5 and holding positions as potential leaders three tiers beneath the board of directors, consisting of Managers in Service Units, Vice Presidents in subsidiaries, and Assistant Vice Presidents. The responses then would be analyzed via IBM SPSS 27.0. Results indicate significant correlations between Coach-Client Relationship, ADKAR model, and Team Effectiveness, enhancing the understanding of coaching in personnel development. This finding highlights the necessity of a well-aligned coaching process to foster effective individual change readiness. Moreover, the finding also reveals that the coaching process extends beyond individual development and has a significant influence on team collaboration and effectiveness. A well-aligned coaching process can more effectively prepare individuals for the transitions and developments required in leadership roles and equip them to contribute positively to team environments. While this study contributes to a better understanding of coaching as a method for people development, there are some limitations concerning the sample and limited time of the study. Future research with a larger and varied sample, across-case data collection, and various additional data is needed. Testing with before-after questionnaires, forum group discussions, and a mixed-method approach would be particularly interesting, including diverse leadership levels and genders.

Keywords :

ADKAR, coach-client relationship, coaching, Evaluation, team effectiveness – process criteria.

References :

  1. Pearse, Noel. (2017). Change Management in a VUCA World: Thriving in the New VUCA Context. 10.1108/978-1-78714-242-820171005.
  2. Baran, Benjamin & Woznyj, Haley. (2020). Managing VUCA. Organizational Dynamics. 50. 100787. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100787.
  3. Rosha, Angelina & Lace, Natalja. (2016). The scope of coaching in the context of organizational change. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2. 10.1186/s40852-016-0028-x.
  4. Johnson, Samantha & Blackman, Deborah & Buick, Fiona. (2018). The 70:20:10 framework and the transfer of learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 29. 10.1002/hrdq.21330.
  5. Amabile, T.M. (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167..pdf
  6. Anggraini (2020) – Identification Of Psychosocial Work Environment Dimensions To Increase Happiness At Work. Unpublished.
  7. Grant, Anthony. (2006). An Integrative Goal-Focused Approach to Executive Coaching. The University of Sydney.
  8. Theeboom, Tim. (2013). Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context.. The Journal of Positive Psychology
  9. Cox, E., Bachkirova, T., & Clutterbuck, D. (2018, August 14). The Complete Handbook of Coaching. SAGE.
  10. Trott, Paul. (2017). Innovation management and new product development. (7.ed) Pearson
  11. Hiatt, Jeff & Hiatt, Jeffrey. (2006). ADKAR: A Model for Change in Business, Government and Our Community.
  12. Heuvel et al 2020 – How do Employees Adapt to Organizational Change? The Role of Meaning-making and Work Engagement. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Phaekwamdee, Marisa & Ayuthaya, Smitti & Kiattisin, Supaporn. (2022). The Effects of Coaching Techniques on Well-Being of Digital-Technology Users. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 8. 170. 10.3390/joitmc8040170.
  14. Fey, Natalia & Nordbäck, Emma & Ehrnrooth, Mats & Mikkonen, Kirsi. (2021). How peer coaching fosters employee proactivity and well-being within a self-managing Finnish digital engineering company. Organizational Dynamics. 51. 100864. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100864.
  15. 6 Team Conditions. Team Diagnostics | Measure & Monitor Your Team Effectiveness. (n.d.). Retrieved on Dec 6th, 2023 from https://6teamconditions.com/services/diagnostics.
  16. Wageman, R. & Hackman, J. & Lehman, Erin. (2005). Team Diagnostic SurveyDevelopment of an Instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 41. 373-398. 10.1177/0021886305281984.
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017, December 12). Research Design. SAGE Publications. http://books.google.ie/books?id=335ZDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Research+Design:+Qualitative,+Quantitative,+and+Mixed+Methods+Approaches+Book+by+J.+David+Creswell&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
  18. Neuman, W. L. (2014, January 1). Social Research Methods.
  19. Kachian, Alice & Elyasi, Sona & Haghani, Hamid. (2018). ADKAR Model and Nurses’ Readiness for Change. Journal of Client-centered Nursing Care. 4. 203-212. 10.32598/jccnc.4.4.203.
  20. The Gold Standard in Coaching | ICF – Core Competencies. (2023, July 3). International Coaching Federation. Retrieved on December 20th, 2023 from https://coachingfederation.org/credentials-and-standards/core-competencies
  21. Tadayon Nabavi, Razieh & Bijandi, Mohammad. (2012). Bandura’s Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory by Razieh Tadayon Nabavi and Mohammad Sadegh Bijandi.
  22. Benjamin E. Baran and Haley M. Woznyj (2020). Managing VUCA. Retrieved on November 9th, 2023 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7439966/
  23. Park, Sohee; Yang, Baiyin; McLean, Gary N. (2008) – An Examination of Relationships between Managerial Coaching and Employee Development – Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference.
  24. Williamson, K., & Johanson, G. (2017, November 27). Research Methods. Chandos Publishing. http://books.google.ie/books?id=GVPXDgAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Research+Methods+Information,+Systems,+and+Contexts+2018&hl=&cd=1&source=gbs_api
  25. Whitmore, J. (1993, September 1). Coaching for Performance. Pfeiffer & Company.
  26. Grant, Anthony. (2006). An Integrative Goal-Focused Approach to Executive Coaching.

How to Cite :

Coaching Effectiveness in Ideation of PLN LDP Level 3. Sofie Nur Fatimah, Henndy Ginting, John Welly, Rio Adrianto, Ridha Dianingratri , 7(2), 1275-1284. Retrieved from https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=15162&pid=14892

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Sofie Nur Fatimah, Henndy Ginting, John Welly, Rio Adrianto, Ridha Dianingratri,

View

71

Citation

Downloads

Article Details