Abstract :

This experimental study investigates which instructional strategies are effective in promoting situational interest in learning mathematics among secondary school students. This research study builds on established theories of interest and mathematics education. Situational interest is an important facet of learning engagement, and it can potentially enhance students’ interest and motivation in class.  A total of 165 students were engaged in this study, selected from three diverse secondary schools in Georgetown, Guyana, encompassing different grade levels and varying motivating profiles. This study employed a quantitative research design, providing a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between instructional strategies and situational interest. Participants were given a carefully constructed questionnaire that entails questions about their level of situational interest and their perceptions of various instructional strategies used in their mathematics classroom. Results suggested visual aids, inquiry-based learning, and collaborative learning are most effective in promoting situational interest. These findings highlight the interplay between pedagogical approaches and students’ motivation, and how closely connected they are. This emphasizes the importance of using teaching strategies that align with students’ interests and needs.

 

---

Keywords :

Collaborative Learning, inquiry-based learning, Instructional Strategies, Learning of Mathematics, Motivation, Situational Interest, Visual Aids.

---

References :

1. Hagan JE, Amoaddai S, Lawer VT, Atteh E. Students’ Perception towards Mathematics and Its Effects on Academic Performance. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. 2020;8(1):8–14.
2. Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG. Interest in Subject Matter: The Mathematics Predicament. Higher Education Studies. 2014;4(6):31–42.
3. Bernacki ML, Walkington C. The Role of Situational Interest in Personalized Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2018;110(6):864–81.
4. Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG. Interest development: Arousing situational interest affects the growth trajectory of individual interest. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2017; 49:175–84.
5. Khalil MK, Elkhider IA. Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education. 2016;40(2):147–56.
6. Quinlan KM. What triggers students’ interest during higher education lectures? personal and situational variables associated with situational interest. Studies in Higher Education. 2019;44(10):1781–92.
7. Azmidar A, Darhim D, Dahlan JA. Enhancing Students’ Interest through Mathematics Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017;895(1):1–6.
8. Palmer D, Dixon J, Archer J. Using Situational Interest to Enhance Individual Interest and Science-Related Behaviours. Research in Science Education. 2017; 47:731–53.
9. Otoo D, Iddrisu WA, Kessie JA, Larbi E. Structural Model of Students’ Interest and Self-Motivation to Learning Mathematics. Education Research International. 2018;1–10.
10. Hunsu NJ, Adesope O, Van Wie BJ. Engendering situational interest through innovative instruction in an engineering classroom: what really mattered? Instructional Science. 2017; 45:789–804.
11. Akdeniz C. Instructional Strategies. In: Instructional Process and Concepts in Theory and Practice. Singapore: Singapore: Springer; 2016. p. 57–105.
12. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ. Current Directions in Mediation Analysis. Current Direction. 2009;18(1):16–20.
13. Parker PD, Van Zanden B, Parker RB. Girls get smart, boys get smug: Historical changes in gender differences in math, literacy, and academic social comparison and achievement. Learning and Instruction. 2018; 54:125–37.
14. Nguyen TT, Nguyen CM, Nguyen ND, T. D, Nahavandi S. Deepfakes Detection Techniques Using Deep Learning: A Survey. Journal of Computer and Communications. 2019;9(05):20–35.
15. Shabiralyani G, Shahzad Hasan K, Hamad N, Iqbal N. Impact of Visual Aids in Enhancing the Learning Process Case Research. Journal of Education and Practice. 2015; 6:226–34.
16. Agwu SN, Ogochi MA. Assessing the Effect of Visual Aids on Secondary School Students’ Achievements in Learning English Language in Agbani Education Zone of Enugu State, Nigeria. Advance Journal of Education and Social Sciences. 2019;4(10).
17. Bernacki M. L., Walkington C. The role of situational interest in personalized learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2018;110(6):864–81.
18. Yalçin SA, Yalçin P, Said Akar M, Sağirli MÖ. The Effect of Teaching Practices with Real Life Content in Light and Sound Learning Areas. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2017;5(9):1621–31.
19. Hashim MHM. Using Technology and Instructional E-Material among Technical Teacher and Student into Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. International Education Studies. 2015;8(3):175–80.
20. Pittman T, Gaines T. Technology Integration in Third, Fourth, and Fifth Grade Classrooms in a Florida School District. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2015;63(4):539–54.
21. Asterhan CS, Schwarz BB. Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist. 2016;51(2):164–87.
22. Leeuwen AV, Janssen J, Erkens G, Brekelmans M. Teacher regulation of cognitive activities during student collaboration: Effects of learning analytics. Educational Research Review. 2015; 90:80–94.
23. Johnson DW, Johnson RT. An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher. 2009;38(5):365–79.
24. Tran VD, Nguyen TML, Van De N, Soryaly C, Doan MN. Does Cooperative Learning may Enhance the Use of Students’ Learning Strategies? International Journal of Higher Education. 2019;8(4):79–88.
25. Durocher E, Potvin P. The Effects of a Full-Year Pedagogical Treatment Based on a Collaborative Learning Environment on 7th Graders’ Interest in Science and Technology and Conceptual Change. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. 2020;3(3):107–24.
26. Dolenc NR, Kazanis WH. A Potential for Interest-Driven Learning to Enhance the Inquiry-Based Learning Process. Science Educator. 2020;27(2):121–8.
27. Cairns D, Areepattamannil S. Exploring the Relations of Inquiry-Based Teaching to Science Achievement and Dispositions in 54 Countries. Research in Science Education. 2019;49(1):1–23.
28. Park YS, Konge L, Artino AR. The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Academic Medicine. 2020;95(5):690–4.
29. Tutz G. Ordinal regression: A review and a taxonomy of model. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2022;14(2 ): e1545
30. McQuillan MT, Leininger J. Supporting gender-inclusive schools: Educators’ beliefs about gender diversity training and implementation plans. Professional Development in Education. 2021;47(1):156–76.