Abstract :
This study explores the relationships between digital learning trends, accessibility convenience, smart book media, early childhood literacy, and language proficiency in Banten Javanese Language. Using a quantitative approach with 140 young learners (aged 10-12), we assessed how digital learning trends and accessibility convenience impact smart book media, early childhood literacy, and language proficiency. Results show that digital learning trends notably affect smart book media’s functionality, contributing to developing early childhood literacy and language skills. Additionally, accessibility convenience is crucial in enhancing smart book media’s utility, fostering early childhood literacy and language proficiency. However, while smart book media significantly influence language skills and early childhood literacy, they don’t mediate the connections between digital learning trends, accessibility convenience, and these language-related outcomes. Educators and stakeholders can utilize these findings to shape culturally sensitive language education strategies, incorporating technology and resource accessibility. This research enriches the theoretical understanding of digital learning trends and accessibility convenience’s impact on language outcomes. It highlights the practical potential of smart book media in language education, aiding educators and policymakers in aligning strategies with contemporary trends and cultural nuances. While limited to Banten Javanese Language, the study prompts further exploration through qualitative and longitudinal studies. Future research should explore cultural influences and intervention programs for optimizing language development. By uniquely merging digital learning trends, accessibility convenience, smart book media, and language outcomes, this study contributes valuable insights to the discourse on language education and technology integration within the distinct context of Banten Javanese Language.
Keywords :
Accessibility Convenience, Digital Learning Trends, Early Childhood Literacy, Language proficiency, Smart Book Media.References :
- Alam, A. (2022). Employing Adaptive Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Robots for Virtual Classrooms and Smart Campuses: Reforming Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence BT – Advanced Computing and Intelligent Technologies (R. N. Shaw, S. Das, V. Piuri, & M. Bianchini (eds.); pp. 395–406). Springer Nature Singapore.
- Alobaid, A. (2020). Smart multimedia learning of ICT: role and impact on language learners’ writing fluency— YouTube online English learning resources as an example. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00134-7
- Andriamiarisoa, M. (2022). Redefining the Meaning of Learning. In Handbook of Research on Future of Work and Education: Implications for Curriculum Delivery and Work Design (pp. 71–93). IGI Global.
- Appel, C., & Fernández, S. S. (2022). Reimagining Language Learning in Higher Education: Key-Roles for Technology BT – Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning: Experience, Trends and Challenges in Higher Education (M. E. Auer, A. Pester, & D. May (eds.); pp. 581–602). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04286-7_28
- Behl, A., Jayawardena, N., Pereira, V., Islam, N., Giudice, M. Del, & Choudrie, J. (2022). Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121445
- Bers, M. U., Strawhacker, A., & Sullivan, A. (2022). The state of the field of computational thinking in early childhood education. OECD Education Working Papers, 274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/3354387a-en
- Bui, T. T. N., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2016). Standardizing English for Educational and Socio-economic Betterment- A Critical Analysis of English Language Policy Reforms in Vietnam BT – English Language Education Policy in Asia (R. Kirkpatrick (ed.); pp. 363–388). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_17
- Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182, 104463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463
- Callahan, R. M., & Shifrer, D. (2016). Equitable Access for Secondary English Learner Students: Course Taking as Evidence of EL Program Effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(3), 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16648190
- Chen, Y. (2022). Using a Game-Based Translation Learning App and Google Apps to Enhance Translation Skills: Amplification and Omission. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2108591
- Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares (pp. 188–194). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
- Choudhury, S., & Pattnaik, S. (2020). Emerging themes in e-learning: A review from the stakeholders’ perspective. Computers & Education, 144, 103657. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103657
- Cladis, A. E. (2018). A shifting paradigm: An evaluation of the pervasive effects of digital technologies on language expression, creativity, critical thinking, political discourse, and interactive processes of human communications. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(5), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017752583
- David, D., Alamoodi, A. H., Albahri, O. S., Zaidan, B. B., Zaidan, A. A., Garfan, S., Ismail, A. R., Albahri, A. S., Alsinglawi, B., & Malik, R. Q. (2023). Landscape of sign language research based on smartphone apps: coherent literature analysis, motivations, open challenges, recommendations and future directions for app assessment. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00966-9
- Davies, S., Janus, M., Duku, E., & Gaskin, A. (2016). Using the Early Development Instrument to examine cognitive and non-cognitive school readiness and elementary student achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 35, 63–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.10.002
- DeCoito, I., & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Transitioning to Online Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic: an Exploration of STEM Teachers’ Views, Successes, and Challenges. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09958-z
- Deliyannis, I., & Kaimara, P. (2019). Developing Smart Learning Environments Using Gamification Techniques and Video Game Technologies BT – Didactics of Smart Pedagogy: Smart Pedagogy for Technology Enhanced Learning (L. Daniela (ed.); pp. 285–307). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_15
- Drljača Margić, B., & Vodopija-Krstanović, I. (2018). Language development for English-medium instruction: Teachers’ perceptions, reflections and learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 31–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.06.005
- Faez, F., & Karas, M. (2017). Connecting Language Proficiency to (Self-Reported) Teaching Ability: A Review and Analysis of Research. RELC Journal, 48(1), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217694755
- Forgie, J. C., Hu, J., & Boccalon, M. (2022). Pre-service and in-service early childhood educators’ self-efficacy and knowledge for early literacy instruction. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2151246. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2151246
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
- Gee, J. P. (2018). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. In Theoretical models and processes of literacy (pp. 105–117). Routledge.
- Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
- Hall, J., & Valdiviezo, S. (2020). The Social Worker as Language Worker in a Multilingual World: Educating for Language Competence. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1642275
- Hobbs, R., & Coiro, J. (2019). Design Features of a Professional Development Program in Digital Literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(4), 401–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.907
- Huddy, A. (2017). Digital technology in the tertiary dance technique studio: expanding student engagement through collaborative and co-creative experiences. Research in Dance Education, 18(2), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647893.2017.1330327
- Kaur, A., Bhatia, M., & Stea, G. (2022). A Survey of Smart Classroom Literature. In Education Sciences (Vol. 12, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020086
- Kayı-Aydar, H. (2019). Positioning Theory in Applied Linguistics BT – Positioning Theory in Applied Linguistics: Research Design and Applications (H. Kayı-Aydar (ed.); pp. 41–69). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97337-1_3
- Kocdar, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2022). Supporting learners with special needs in open, distance, and digital education. In Handbook of open, distance and digital education (pp. 1–16). Springer.
- Kucirkova, N. (2017). An integrative framework for studying, designing and conceptualising interactivity in children’s digital books. British Educational Research Journal, 43(6), 1168–1185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3317
- Kumar, K. L., & Owston, R. (2016). Evaluating e-learning accessibility by automated and student-centered methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9413-6
- Kurvers, J., Van de Craats, I., & Van Hout, R. (2015). Footprints for the future: Cognition, literacy and second language learning by adults. Adult Literacy, Second Language, and Cognition, 7–32.
- Lee, S.-M. (2022). A systematic review of context-aware technology use in foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1688836
- Livingstone, S. (2018). Reframing media effects in terms of children’s rights in the digital age. In Children, Adolescents, and Media (pp. 19–27). Routledge.
- Livingstone, S., & Pothong, K. (2023). Child rights by design: guidance for innovators of digital products and services used by children.
- Luke, A., & Carmen, L. (2018). Adolescence lost/childhood regained: On early intervention and the emergence of the techno-subject. In Critical Literacy, Schooling, and Social Justice (pp. 189–215). Routledge.
- Malik, R. S. (2018). Educational challenges in 21st century and sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research, 2(1), 9–20.
- Manches, A., & Plowman, L. (2017). Computing education in children’s early years: A call for debate. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 191–201. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12355
- Marijuan, S., & Sanz, C. (2018). Expanding Boundaries: Current and New Directions in Study Abroad Research and Practice. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 185–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12323
- Marlatt, R. (2018). Literary Analysis Using Minecraft: An Asian American Youth Crafts Her Literacy Identity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.747
- Mikheev, A., Serkina, Y., & Vasyaev, A. (2021). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Current trends in the digital transformation of higher education institutions in Russia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4537–4551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10467-6
- Milakovich, M. E., & Wise, J.-M. (2019). Digital learning: The challenges of borderless education. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Musik, C., & Bogner, A. (2019). Book title: Digitalization & society. Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 44(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-019-00344-5
- Nepo, K. (2017). The Use of Technology to Improve Education. Child & Youth Care Forum, 46(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9386-6
- Okilwa, N. S., & Robert, C. (2017). School Discipline Disparity: Converging Efforts for Better Student Outcomes. The Urban Review, 49(2), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-017-0399-8
- Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., & Smits, A. (2018). Digital Agency: Empowering Equity in and through Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 425–439. https://doorg/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x
- Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., Kazanidis, I., & Wells, D. (2019). Augmenting the learning experience in primary and secondary school education: a systematic review of recent trends in augmented reality game-based learning. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0347-2
- Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
- Shohel, M. M. C. (2022). Education in emergencies: challenges of providing education for Rohingya children living in refugee camps in Bangladesh. Education Inquiry, 13(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2020.1823121
- Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
- Strawhacker, A., Lee, M., & Bers, M. U. (2018). Teaching tools, teachers’ rules: exploring the impact of teaching styles on young children’s programming knowledge in ScratchJr. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9400-9
- Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
- Tolio, T., Bernard, A., Colledani, M., Kara, S., Seliger, G., Duflou, J., Battaia, O., & Takata, S. (2017). Design, management and control of demanufacturing and remanufacturing systems. CIRP Annals, 66(2), 585–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.001
- Tseng, J.-J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531
- Tzima, S., Styliaras, G., Bassounas, A., & Tzima, M. (2020). Harnessing the potential of storytelling and mobile technology in intangible cultural heritage: A case study in early childhood education in sustainability. Sustainability, 12(22), 9416.
- Vu, N. N., Hung, B. P., Van, N. T. T., & Lien, N. T. H. (2022). Theoretical and Instructional Aspects of Using Multimedia Resources in Language Education: A Cognitive View BT – Multimedia Technologies in the Internet of Things Environment, Volume 2 (R. Kumar, R. Sharma, & P. K. Pattnaik (eds.); pp. 165–194). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3828-2_9
- Woodley, X. M., & Rice, M. F. (2022). Designing Intersectional Online Education: Critical Teaching and Learning Practices. Routledge.
- Wyse, D., Bradford, H., Jones, R., & Wolpert, M. A. (2018). Teaching English, language and literacy. Routledge.
- Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, 100326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
- Zhao, Y., & Lai, C. (2023). Technology and second language learning: Promises and problems. In Technology-mediated learning environments for young English learners (pp. 167–206). Routledge.