Abstract :

This thesis investigates the portfolio optimization process using the Markowitz model on the SRI-KEHATI index, an esteemed sustainable investment index. The study aims to explore the potential advantages of incorporating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into portfolio construction. By leveraging historical financial data and reliable ESG metrics, this research develops optimized portfolios that strike a balance between risk and return while adhering to the sustainability criteria of the SRIKEHATI index.

The methodology encompasses the collection of credible ESG data and financial information for the constituents of the SRIKEHATI index. The Markowitz model is subsequently employed to analyze the risk and return characteristics of each asset within the portfolio. Through the application of optimization algorithms, the study seeks to identify the optimal asset allocation that maximizes risk-adjusted returns, taking into account the ESG criteria outlined by the SRI-KEHATI index.

The outcomes of this research provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of portfolio optimization techniques within the realm of sustainable investing. By considering both financial metrics and ESG factors, investors can construct portfolios that align with their sustainability objectives while optimizing risk and return. The findings shed light on the performance of the optimized portfolios and compare them with conventional approaches, thereby demonstrating the potential benefits of integrating ESG considerations into portfolio decision-making.

Additionally, this study examines the practical implications associated with implementing sustainable portfolio strategies based on the SRI-KEHATI index.

Overall, this thesis contributes to the expanding body of knowledge on sustainable investing and portfolio optimization, specifically focusing on the SRI-KEHATI index. It provides valuable insights for investors, asset managers, and policymakers interested in sustainable investment strategies. Furthermore, it offers a framework for incorporating ESG considerations into the portfolio construction process using the Markowitz model, thereby aiding in the development of more robust and sustainable investment portfolios.

---

Keywords :

ESG, Markowitz, PESTLE, Sharpe Ratio., SRI-KEHATI, Sustainable finance.

---

References :

1. Administration, N. O. (2022, June 3). Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industrial levels. Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/.
2. Alliance, G. S. (2020). Global Sustainable Investment Review.
3. Amlot, M. (2022, July 21). Green investments are critical for long-term economic growth. Retrieved from https://www.arabianbusiness.com/.
4. Brito, I., & Machado, G. J. (2023). Performance Evaluation of Portfolio Stocks Selected with the EU–EV Risk Model. Computational Science and Its Applications, 69-83.
5. Chen, L., Zang, L., Huang, J., & Xiao, H. (2021). Social Responsibility Portfolio Optimization Incorporating ESG Criteria. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 75-85.
6. de Sousa, G. C., & Castaneda-Ayarza, J. A. (2022). PESTEL analysis and the macro-environmental factors that influence the development of the electric and hybrid vehicles industry in Brazil. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 686-699.
7. Giese, G., Melas, D., Lee, L. E., & Nagy, Z. (2019). Foundations of ESG Investing: How ESG Affects Equity Valuation, Risk, and Performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management , 69-83.
8. Herdiana, I. (2021, July 16). bandungbergerak.id. Retrieved from Bandung Bergerak.
9. Indonesia, B. (2022). Synergy and Innovation to Accelarate Intermediation Revival and MaintainFinancial System Resilience. Bank Indonesia.
10. Indonesia, B. (2023). Konsistensi, Inovasi, dan Sinergi Kebijakan Memperkuat Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Menuju Indonesia Maju. Bank Indonesia.
11. com. (2023). Indonesia 10-Year Bond Yield. Retrieved from investing.com: https://www.investing.com/ratesbonds/indonesia-10-year-bond-yield-historical-data
12. Jeanice, J., & Kim, S. S. (2022). Pengaruh Penerapan ESG Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan di Indonesia. Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi.
13. Keuangan, O. J. (2022). Indonesia Green Taxonomy.
14. Kilic, M., Yang , L., & Zhang , B. M. (2022). The cross-section of investment and profitability: Implications for asset pricing. Journal of Financial Economics, 706-724.
15. Kumar, R. (2019). Research Methodology. Sage Publications Limited.
16. Kuziak, K., & Gorka, J. (2023). Dependence Analysis for the Energy Sector Based on Energy ETFs. Energy Economics: Markets, Pricing and Policies, 16.
17. Ma, Y., Ahmad, F., Liu , M., & Wang, Z. (2020). Portfolio optimization in the era of digital financialization using cryptocurrencies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
18. (2021). Indonesia’s Sustainable Transformation. PwC.
19. (2023). ESG in Indonesia: Access to Finance.
20. Reform, I. f. (2023). Indonesia Sustainable Finance Outlook 2023. IESR.
21. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.
22. Stanley, M. (2021). Morgan Stanley’s Institute of Sustainable Investing Report. Administration, N. O. (2022, June 3). Carbon dioxide now more than 50% higher than pre-industrial levels. Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/.Tavel, P. 2007 Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd.