Abstract :

This study explores the relationship between airline responses to service failures and customer’s satisfaction and loyalty in the airline industry. Using a framework that includes various airline response categories derived from a service blueprint such as overbooking, flight delays, cancellations, lost or damaged luggage, in-flight service issues, customer service failures, and security issues, this study investigates the relationship between these factors and customer satisfaction, as well as the resulting impact on customer loyalty. A qualitative approach has been used alongside by using non-probability sampling that will be use in this study includes snowball sampling and convenience sampling. Upon collected data through survey, the result is then being regressed linearly in SPSS. The analysis of data reveals that effective and timely handling of service failures, as well as considerate handling of complaints, play a significant role in determining customer satisfaction. In addition, customer satisfaction influences customer loyalty positively, highlighting the significance of service recovery in nurturing long-term customer relationships. The findings emphasize the need for airlines to prioritize efficient service recovery processes, such as transparent communication and adequate compensation for service failures. Future research recommendations include investigating the role of technology in service recovery efforts and other service failure scenarios. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on service recovery in the airline industry and offers insights for marketing strategies to increase customer satisfaction and loyalty.

---

Keywords :

Airline Industry, Airline responses, Communication, Compensation, Customer Loyalty, Customer Satisfaction, Marketing, service failure., Technology

---

References :

1. H. Hassan and A. E. Salem, “Impact of service quality of low-cost carriers on airline image and consumers’ satisfaction and loyalty during the covid-19 outbreak,” Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010083.
2. Lovelock and L. Wright, “Principles of Service Marketing and Management: Pearson Education,” Inc. Upper Saddler River, New Jersey, pp. 2–15, 2002.
3. Jafarkarimi, A. T. H. Sim, R. Saadatdoost, and J. M. Hee, “Designing a scenario-based questionnaire to assess behavioral intention in social networking sites’ ethical dilemmas,” Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol. 19, pp. 145–159, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38974-5_12.
4. “Airline industry – passenger traffic worldwide 2004-2022 | Statista.” https://www.statista.com/statistics/564717/airline-industry-passenger-traffic-globally/ (accessed Mar. 02, 2023).

5. “Air Travel Consumer Report: Consumer Complaints Up from May, Nearly 270 Percent Above Pre-Pandemic Levels,” Bureau of Transportation of Statistics, Aug. 26, 2022. https://www.bts.gov/newsroom/airtravel-consumer-report-consumer-complaints-may-nearly-270-percent-above-prepandemic#:~:text=Complaints%20About%20Airline%20Service&text=Of %20the%205%2C862%20complai nts%20received,complaints%20received%20in%20June%202022. (accessed Mar. 02, 2023).
6. L. Shostack, “Service Positioning through Structural Change,” J Mark, vol. 51, no. 1, 1987, doi: 10.1177/002224298705100103.

7. T. Chuang, “Combining service blueprint and FMEA for service design,” Service Industries Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, 2007, doi: 10.1080/02642060601122587.
8. Patrício, R. P. Fisk, and J. Falcão E Cunha, “Designing multi-interface service experiences: The service experience blueprint,” J Serv Res, vol. 10, no. 4, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1094670508314264.
9. R. Chen and B. W. Cheng, “Applying the ISO 9001 process approach and service blueprint to hospital management systems,” TQM Journal, vol. 24, no. 5. 2012. doi: 10.1108/17542731211261575.
10. Go and I. Kim, “In-flight NCCI management by combining the Kano model with the service blueprint: A comparison of frequent and infrequent flyers,” Tour Manag, vol. 69, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.06.034.

11. Collis and R. Hussey, Business Research A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students 3rd edition, vol. 142. 2013.
12. Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, “Research methods for business students, 5th ed., Harlow,” Pearson Education, 2009.
13. K. Yin, “Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied social research Methods Series, Newbury Park CA, Sage,” The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, no. 2014, 1984.
14. Pritzker, “Russell L. Ackoff and Anheuser-Busch. II. The influence of the organization on the man,” Systems Practice, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 151–158, Apr. 1990, doi: 10.1007/BF01060878.
15. Taherdoost, “Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3205035.
16. Kumari and S. Yadav, “Linear regression analysis study,” Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 33, 2018, doi: 10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_8_18.
17. J. Pedhazur, “Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New Y ork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.,” Coaching Eiticacy and Youth Sport, 1982.
18. Litwin, How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity. 2014. doi: 10.4135/9781483348957.
19. J. Vaske, J. Beaman, and C. C. Sponarski, “Rethinking Internal Consistency in Cronbach’s Alpha,” Leis Sci, vol. 39, no. 2, 2017, doi: 10.1080/01490400.2015.1127189.
20. Sekaran U. (2003), “Research Methods for Business; Skills Building Approach, 4th edition, John Wiley and sons, New York,” J Multidiscip Eval, no. 20, 2003.
21. W. Zimmerman and R. H. Williams, “The theory of test validity and correlated errors of measurement,” J Math Psychol, vol. 16, no. 2, 1977, doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90063-3.
22. E. Cureton, “Reliability and validity: Basic assumptions and experimental designs,” Educ Psychol Meas, vol. 25, no. 2, 1965, doi: 10.1177/001316446502500204.
23. J. Rosopa, M. M. Schaffer, and A. N. Schroeder, “Managing heteroscedasticity in general linear models,” Psychol Methods, vol. 18, no. 3, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0032553.