Abstract :

The purpose of this study was on assessing of teaching and learning methods for secondary school biology subject content as an approach to addressing environmental degradation in Malawi. Case study of Karonga district. The study was guided by the following research specific objectives: to assess how success criteria in secondary school Biology syllabi are framed to address environmental degradation in Malawi; to investigate the appropriateness of the methods of teaching and learning Biology that address environmental degradation and to examine how Biology teachers assess students’ fieldwork that is required by the syllabus. A mixed method approach (qualitative and quantitative methods) was used in this study. Sixty secondary school teachers were selected from 40 secondary schools in Northern Education Division in the Ministry of Education in Malawi as research participants. Schools and participants were selected through convenience and purposive sampling techniques respectively.  In this study, data was collected through interviews, questionnaire and document analysis. Data analysis was done thematically and using statistics. The research study found out that the success criteria, content and teaching and learning methods in Biology would not address environmental degradation because success criteria were not framed well and had many action verbs such as ‘explain’, ‘describe’ and ‘state’. In addition, explanation was the main teaching and learning methods used by Secondary school Biology teachers which would not address environmental degradation since they did not encourage learning through practice, The findings also revealed that Biology teachers in secondary schools assessed learners with the aim of passing public examinations and not assisting learners to acquire skills to deal with issues of environmental degradation.

---

Keywords :

---

References :

1. Acara, (2011). The Shape of the Australian Curriculum: Biology: ACARA. Retrieve from acara.edu.au.
2. Adeolu, A. T. (2014). Assessment of Secondary School Students’ Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Waste Management in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296607808
3. Alvarez-Garcia, O., Sureda-Negee, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2015). Environmental Education in Pre-service Teacher Training: A Literature of existing Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 72-85.
4. Anita, B., Serbastian, L., & Narayan, S. (2015). A Strategic and Transformative Approach to Education for Sustainable Development. Sweden: Blekinge Institute of
5. Asongu, S., Le Roux, S., & Biekepe, N. (2017). Environmental degradation ICT and Inclusive Development in Sub Saharan Africa. DOI:1016/j.empol. 2017. 09.049 353-361.
6. Bekele, A. (2015). Successful Tree Planting Experiment in School Environment. The Case of Yeka Wacho and Worgaja Secondary Schools in Ethiopia.
7. Benrendt, M., & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of Research on School Field trips and their Value in Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235- 245. doi:10.12973/ijese.2014.213a.
8. Bitsch, V. (2005). Qualitative Research in Education. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
9. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27- 40.Doi: 3316/QRJ0902027
10. Chakwera, E. W. J., Thawe, L. J., Banda F. K., Matemba, A. B., January, M. (2003). General Teaching Methods, Education, Module 2, Domasi: Domasi College of Education.
11. Chua, K. J., Yang, W. M. & Leo, H. L. (2014). Enhanced and Convectional Project-based
12. Learning Module. European Journal of Engineering Education 39(5), 556 572.

http://dx:doi. Org/10/1080/03043797.2014.895704.

13. Clifford, B. (2013). Bioolgy in the British school System. London: Education Information Centre.
14. Cohen, L., Mario, L., & Mourisson, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6^th ). London: Routledge Taylor Francis Group
15. Courtin, G. M. (1994). A History of Environmental Degradation in Sudbury: Science of the Total Environment, Sudbury: Elsevier.
16. Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. London: Sage Publications.
17. Daniel, M. (2010). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS, (2^nd). London: Sage Publication.
18. Davis, B. J., & Summers, M. (2015). Applying Dale’s Cone of Experience to Increase Learning and Retention. A Study of Biology students learning in secondary schools of Nairobi, Kenya.
19. Dermici, A., Kercler, T., & Kaya, H. (2015). Activity – Based Learning in Secondary
20. School Biologyy in Turkey: A study from Biology Teachers’ Perspective. World Applied Sciences Journal, 11(1): 53-63.
21. Dhlamini, M. (2011). Integrating Education for Sustainable Development into the Teaching and Learning of Biologyy. Masters Dissertation.
22. Durrheim, K. (2006). Research Design. Applied Methods for the Social Sciences. South Africa: University of Cape Town Press (Pvt) Ltd.
23. Elsevier, (2015). Journal Energy, Volume 84, pp. 382-389. Retrieved from  science.com>84>
24. Falkenberg, T., & Babiuk, G. (2016).The status of Education for Sustainability in Initial Teacher education Programmes: A Canadian case study. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher education, 15(4), 418-430. htts://doi.org
25. Fraenkel, & Wallen, (2009). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (5^th). New York, Mc Grow-Hill.
26. Freire, P. (2000). The Banking Model of Education in Pronzo. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Gall, M. D., Borg. W. R., & Gall. J. P. (2003). An Introduction to Education Research, New York: Longman Publishers.
28. Gibbs, G. (1998). Learning by Doing. A guide to Teaching and Learning Methods, Oxford: Brooks University.
29. Gitau, P. N. (2015). Mastering Biology Education. Nairobi: Kenya Literature Bureau Government of Ireland, (1999). Biologyy, Social, Environmental and Scientific Education Curriculum. Dublin: Government Publications.
30. Government of Malawi, (2010). Malawi State of Environment and Outlook Report, Lilongwe: Environmental Affairs Department.
31. Greenfield, P. (2020). Human exploiting and destroying nature on unprecedented scale-report. New Jersey: The Guardian.
32. Grindsted, T. S. (2017). The Matter of Biology in Education for Sustainable Development Transformative Approaches to Sustainable Development: Case of Secondary School Biology in Germany: Cham Publication.
33. Guo, F., & Lane, J. (2018). Sustainable Development in Biology Education for Middle School in China: School of Biological Sciences, Shanghai: East China Normal
34. Hershberger, M. (2014). Land use Policy, Vol. 25, Issue 2 Retrieved from metadonet.com
35. Jones, S. (1985). Depth Interviewing. Applied Qualitative Research. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
36. Kagoda, A. M. (2016). Teaching of Biology in Uganda Secondary Schools. Advances in Social Sciences Research, Journal, 3(5), 1 – 14.
37. Kenya Institute of Education, (2002). Secondary Biology Syllabus. Nairobi: Government Press.
38. Kipgokei, K. E. (2016). The Role of Biology in Secondary Schools, Nairobi: Kenyatta.
39. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and techniques (2^nd). New Dehli: New Age International (P) Limited, Publisher.
40. Kumar, V., Singh, J. & Kumar, P. (2020). Environmental Degradation: Causes and Remediation Strategies, Haridawar: Agro Environ Media, Agriculture and Environmental Science Academy.
41. Kummar, K. (2011). Research Methodology: A step by step Guide for beginners (3^rd). London: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd.
42. Lotz-Sistika, H. B., Tshiningayamwe, S., & Urenje, S. (2017). Sustainability Starts with Teachers. An ESD Professional Development for Secondary Teacher Educators. Harare/Pretoria: UNESCO/SARUA.
43. Lovat, T. (2011). Values Pedagogy and Teacher Education: Re-conceiving the Foundations. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(7), 31-44.
44. Malawi Institute of Education, (2013). Climate change Sourcebook for Primary School Teachers, Domasi: MIE.
45. Malawi Institute of Education,(2014). Biology Orientation Manual for New Junior Certificate Curriculum, Domasi: MIE.
46. Malawi Institute of Education, (2015). Climate change Sourcebook for Secondary School Teachers, Domasi: MIE.
47. Marie, D. G., Lindsay, D. O., & Edlea, G.D. (2017). Difficulties Faced in Teaching Biologyy Lessons at Public Secondary Schools Division of Zambales,
48. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(9), 66-70.
49. Mckeown, R. (2015). The ESD Toolkit 2.0 Web Published Document. Retrieved from  http:www.esdtoolkit.org/discussion on/default.htm.
50. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
51. Mezirow, J (2009). Learning as Transformation. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
52. Mittwende, S. (2012). Research Paradigms and Their Use and Importance in Theological Inquiry and Education. International Journal of Christianity and Education. SAGE.
53. Mogalakwe, M. (2006). Research Report: The use of documentary research methods in social research. African Sociological Review, 10(1), 221-230.
54. Mohammed, A. H. (2016). Strategies in Teaching Biogy in Secondary Schools in Ethiopia. Thesis Submitted in Accordance with Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education, Ethiopia. Dessie: Wollo University.
55. Mphapuli, S. E., & Luneta, K. (1992). Biology and Mathematics Issues in Southern Africa: Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
56. Mtunda, F. G., & Safuli, S. D. D. (1986). An Introduction of Theory and Practice of Teaching, Blantyre: Dzuka Publishing Company.
57. Mwituria, S. M. (2012). Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods Simplified. Nairobi: Frajopa.
58. Nacino-Brown, Oke & Brown (1994). Curriculum and Instruction: An Introduction to Methods of Teaching, London: Mac Millan.
59. O’ Flaherty, J., & Liddy, M. (2017). The Impact of Development Education for Sustainable Development Interventions: A Synthesis of Environmental Education DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484
60. O’Leary, Z. (2014). The Essential Guide to do Your Research Project (2^nd).Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
61. O’Neill, G., Doyle, E., O’Boyle, K. & Clipson, N. (2010). Choice of Assessment Methods within a module: Students experiences and staff recommendations for Designing & delivering curricula for the future. Dublin City  University: All Ireland Society for Higher Education.
62. Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R. Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven,
63. H,, Roberts C. M. & Sexton, J. O. (2014). The Biodiversity of Species  and their rates of extinction, distribution and Protection. Science. 344(6187):124675.doi:10.1126/science.1246752.PMID24876501.
64. Ranjit, K. (2005). Research Methodology- A Step- by- Step for Beginners. Singapore: Pearson Education.
65. Reid, A. (2000). How does Biology Teacher Contribute to Pupils’ Environments Education? Unweaving the Web between Theorizing and Data. CanadianJournalofEnvironmentEducation,5(1),327-343.

https//cjee.lakeheadu.ca/articules/download/3/6/250.

66. Rossmall, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An Introduction to qualitative research. California: SAGE Publications.
67. Seguin, R. (2015). The Elaboration of Textbooks Methodological Guide: Division of Educational Sciences, Contents and Methods of Education:
68. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness on Qualitative Research Project: Education for Information 22(2):63–75. DOI: 103233/EFI-2004-22201.
69. Shroder, J. F. (2014). Natural Resources in Afghanstan: Afghanstan: Elsevier.
70. Silverman, D. (1998). Qualitative Research, Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage Publications.
71. Sterling, S., & Baines, J. (2011). A Review of Transformative Learning, Dorchester: Schumacher College.
72. Suter, W. N., (2006). Introduction to Educational Research. A Critical Thinking Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
73. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2002). Handbook of Mixed Methods, London: Sage
74. Tayie, S. (2005). Research Methods and Writing Research Proposal: Centre for
75. Advancement of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering Studies, Cairo.
76. Taylor, E (2012). The Biology Handbook of Transformational Learning: Theory, ‘Research and Practice, San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass.
77. (1994). United Nations Environmental Annual Report, New York: UNEP.
78. (2008). ESD Innovations. Mainstreaming Environment and sustainability in African Universities Programme. Nairobi: UNEP
79. (2011). Climate change starters’ Guidebook: An Issues Guidebook for Educational Planners and Practitioners: New York: UNEP.
80. (2019). United Nations Environmental Annual Report, New York: UNEP.
81. (2020). Environmental Governance Update, New York: UNEP.
82. (2015a). Education 2030 Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of n Sustainable Development Goal 4, Paris: UNESCO UNESCO.  (2016). Education 2030 Incheon Declaration and Framework  for Action
83. Towards Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning for All. Paris: UNESCO.
84. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals. Learning Objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
85. (2020). Environment. https://www.usaid.gov.
86. Wals, A. (2010). Learning in a changing World and Changing in a Learning World: Reflexively Fumbling towards Sustainability. Southern Africa Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), 35-45.000000000.
87. Watts, J. (2019). The Human Society under Urgent Threat from loss of Earth’s Natural Life. New Jersey, The Guardian. Retrieved in January, 2020.
88. Wickham, M,. & Woods, M. (2005). Reflecting on the Strategic Use and Report of
89. CAQDAS to manage and Report on the Qualitative Research Process. The Qualitative Report, 10(4): 687 – 702.
90. Zhou, H. (2015). Teaching Strategy of Sustainable Development Education in Biologyy Curriculum. prim.second.educ.
91. Zhylkybay, G., Magzhan, S., Suinzhanova, Z., Balaubekov, M. & Adiyeva, P. (2014). The Effectiveness of Using the Project Process, Turkestan: Elsevier.